Companies

The Shade Franchising Group, LLC presents a high-cost entry point with a $49,500 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $309,000 to $503,800, coupled with an 8.0% royalty. ⚠ A significant red flag is the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, making it impossible to verify any historical or projected outlet performance. ✓ The franchise has no reported litigation or bankruptcy history, which is a positive indicator of legal stability. However, with no data on total outlets, openings, or closures, the brand’s scale and growth trajectory remain entirely opaque, representing a substantial risk for prospective franchisees.

Steel Coated Floors presents a significant information gap for potential franchisees, as the absence of any disclosed financial data, including Item 19, makes it impossible to evaluate unit economics or historical performance. ⚠ The lack of any outlet counts, franchise fees, or investment ranges suggests this is either a very new or pre-revenue franchise offering with no proven track record. ✓ On a positive note, the absence of reported litigation or bankruptcy filings indicates a clean legal history. However, without any operational scale or financial disclosure, this opportunity carries exceptionally high uncertainty and requires extensive independent due diligence before any consideration.

Crazy Delights Group, LLC presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated data on unit-level revenue or profitability. ⚠ The total investment range of $297,000 to $503,000 is substantial for a concept with zero disclosed outlets, no reported growth, and no operational track record. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a neutral positive, but it does little to offset the fundamental lack of scale and financial transparency. Without any outlet openings or closures to analyze, this franchise offers no credible basis for assessing its business model or growth trajectory.

Hydralive presents a high-risk investment opportunity due to the absence of any operational history or financial performance data, as no outlets, Item 19 disclosure, or growth metrics are provided. The total investment range of $207,650 to $446,900 is substantial for a concept with zero proven track record, and the $49,500 franchise fee is significant without any validation of unit economics. ⚠ The lack of any outlet openings or closures suggests this is either a very new or pre-revenue franchise, making it impossible to assess market viability or franchisee success rates. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a neutral positive, but it does little to offset the fundamental risk of investing in an unproven system with no disclosed financial benchmarks.

El Pollo Loco, Inc. presents a significant data gap for potential franchisees, as no Item 19 financial performance representation is provided, making it impossible to assess unit-level economics or validate earnings potential. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history suggests a clean legal and financial record, which is a positive indicator of corporate stability. ⚠ However, without any disclosure on franchise fee, royalty, total investment, or outlet counts, the brand offers no transparency on scale, cost of entry, or growth trajectory, leaving investors to operate blindly. This lack of critical data makes El Pollo Loco a high-risk consideration until comprehensive FDD details are released.

CyberGlobal presents a high-risk investment due to the complete absence of financial performance representations (Item 19), leaving prospective franchisees without any data on potential revenue or profitability. The $75,000 franchise fee is substantial, yet the total investment range is undisclosed, creating significant financial uncertainty. ⚠ The lack of any outlet count, historical openings, or closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, market traction, or stability. Without litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary red flag is the total opacity of the franchise's operational and financial health.

Garage Force enters the market with a moderate initial investment of $127,900 to $200,600 and a $49,500 franchise fee, supported by a 5% royalty and a disclosed Item 19. ✓ The presence of financial performance data offers transparency for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the absence of any outlet counts or growth data raises significant concerns about the brand's operational scale and traction. ⚠ The litigation disclosure is a notable red flag that warrants careful due diligence before proceeding.

The Steam Police enters the market with a moderate initial investment range of $174,500 to $281,000 and a $40,000 franchise fee, but the absence of any Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant ⚠ red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. The lack of any reported outlet openings or closures, combined with no data on total system scale, makes it impossible to assess growth trajectory or operational stability. While the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history ✓, the complete opacity around financial performance and system size presents a high-risk profile for potential investors.

Live 2 B Healthy® Senior Fitness operates as a low-cost franchise opportunity with a total investment range of $77,185 to $121,925, making it accessible for entry-level investors. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of Item 19 financial performance data and any disclosed outlet counts or growth metrics makes it impossible to assess unit-level economics or franchisee success rates. This franchise presents a significant information gap, as prospective buyers cannot evaluate revenue potential or historical closure trends before investing.

Uncle Sharkii is a very early-stage franchise opportunity with no disclosed outlet count, growth data, or financial performance in Item 19, making it impossible to assess its operational track record or unit-level economics. The relatively low franchise fee of $10,000 and total investment range of $90,000 to $299,500 position it as an accessible entry point for prospective franchisees. ⚠ The complete absence of any historical outlet openings or closures, combined with the lack of an Item 19, presents a significant information gap and elevates the risk profile for investors. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy filings is a neutral positive, but the lack of proven system performance means this is a speculative investment.

Moge Tee enters the bubble tea market with a moderate initial investment range of $158,700 to $269,300 and a low 3.0% royalty fee, which is attractive for a food-service concept. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history suggests a clean legal and financial background. ⚠ However, the lack of any disclosed outlet counts—total, opened, or closed—makes it impossible to assess the brand's actual scale, growth trajectory, or franchisee turnover, representing a significant information gap for prospective investors. This franchise offers a potentially lower-cost entry point, but the complete opacity around its operational track record is a major red flag.

Farm Stores / Swiss Farms presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of Item 19 financial performance data, which prevents any validation of unit-level economics. ⚠ The presence of litigation in the franchise's history is a significant red flag, raising concerns about franchisee relations or legal disputes. ✓ The relatively low total investment range of $145,400 to $249,200 and a modest $15,000 franchise fee make this one of the more affordable single-unit concepts available. However, without any disclosed outlet growth or closure data, prospective franchisees are essentially investing without key metrics to assess the brand's operational health or expansion trajectory.

EDIBLE® presents a moderate-cost franchise opportunity with a total investment range of $240,000 to $531,000 and a $30,000 franchise fee, supported by a 5.0% royalty. ✓ The inclusion of Item 19 financial disclosure provides prospective franchisees with performance data to evaluate potential returns. ⚠ However, the presence of litigation is a notable red flag that warrants careful due diligence. The absence of outlet growth data makes it difficult to assess the brand's current scale or trajectory.

Steelbound Brewery & Distillery presents a high-risk investment opportunity with an exceptionally wide total investment range of $247,500 to $3,184,500, yet it offers no Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profitability data. ⚠ The absence of any operating outlets, historical openings, or closures suggests this is a pre-revenue or very early-stage franchise concept with no proven track record. ✓ The franchise fee is moderate at $50,000 with a 4.0% royalty, and there are no litigation or bankruptcy issues on record. However, the lack of any unit growth data and financial performance representations makes it impossible to assess the brand's viability or return on investment.

Tutu School Franchises, LLC presents a significant information gap for potential franchisees, as the provided data lacks all key metrics including total outlets, franchise fee, royalty, total investment, and any financial performance disclosure (Item 19). ⚠ The absence of Item 19 means there is no verifiable data on historical or projected earnings, making it impossible to assess the business's financial viability or return on investment. ✓ On a positive note, the franchise reports no litigation or bankruptcy history, suggesting a clean legal and financial background. However, without any growth trajectory data (outlets opened or closed) or cost structure, this opportunity carries extreme uncertainty and requires extensive independent due diligence before any consideration.

Hear Again Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated data on unit economics or earnings potential. The total investment range of $187,100 to $318,450 is moderate, but the $52,500 franchise fee is relatively high for a concept with no disclosed outlet count or growth history. ⚠ The lack of any operational track record, combined with zero information on openings or closures, makes it impossible to assess the brand's stability or market acceptance. Without financial disclosure or a proven system, this franchise carries significant uncertainty and should be approached with extreme caution.

Cabinet IQ Franchising, LLC presents a clean background with no recorded litigation or bankruptcy ✓, but the total absence of operational data prevents a meaningful assessment of its scale or financial viability ⚠. The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant drawback for prospective investors, as there is no data to validate potential return on investment ⚠. Furthermore, missing metrics regarding outlet counts, fees, and recent growth suggest this is either a very early-stage or opaque opportunity that requires extreme caution ⚠.

CRS Franchising, LLC presents a significant risk profile due to the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, making it impossible to validate unit-level economics or earnings potential. The total investment range of $201,300 to $422,700 is substantial, yet the franchise fee of $55,000 is not accompanied by a disclosed royalty structure, creating uncertainty about ongoing costs. ⚠ The lack of any outlet count data—including total units, openings, or closures—prevents assessment of the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or system stability. ✓ While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a neutral positive, the total lack of operational and financial transparency makes this a high-risk opportunity requiring extensive independent due diligence.

Taco Del Mar presents a high-risk profile due to the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving franchisees without validated earnings data. The low $5,000 franchise fee and 5% royalty are attractive, but the total investment range of $220,600 to $611,000 is significant for a brand with no reported outlet growth or closures. ⚠ The lack of any operational scale or recent expansion data makes it impossible to assess the system's health or market traction. Without litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary red flag is the complete opacity around unit economics and performance.

Intelligration Capital BB, LLC represents a high-capital B2B investment opportunity with a total estimated cost ranging from $559,300 to over $3.1 million. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean history with no reported litigation or bankruptcy, though the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it difficult to assess potential returns. ⚠ Critical data regarding outlet counts, royalty fees, and unit growth is listed as N/A, resulting in insufficient transparency to fully evaluate the system's scale and trajectory. ⚠

Decorating Den Systems, Inc. presents a clean background with ✓ no history of litigation or bankruptcy. However, the franchise represents a high-risk data vacuum, lacking an Item 19 financial disclosure and failing to report critical metrics like unit counts, fees, or investment costs. ⚠ The absence of this fundamental performance and scale data prevents a viable assessment of the business model or its growth trajectory.

Storm Guard Franchise Systems, LLC presents a significant information gap for prospective franchisees, as the provided data lacks all key metrics including total outlets, franchise fee, royalty, total investment, and any financial performance representation (Item 19). ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 means there is no disclosed historical financial data to evaluate potential earnings or unit economics, making it impossible to assess revenue or profitability expectations. ✓ On a positive note, the franchise reports no litigation or bankruptcy history, suggesting a clean legal and financial background. However, without any growth or closure data, there is no basis to evaluate the system's expansion trajectory or franchisee turnover, leaving analysts with an incomplete risk profile.

Kale Me Crazy Franchising, Inc. presents a significant risk profile due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated data on unit-level revenue or profitability. The total investment range of $321,447 to $572,037 is substantial for a concept with no disclosed outlet count or growth trajectory, making it impossible to assess market penetration or brand momentum. ⚠ The lack of any historical outlet openings or closures data further obscures the system's stability and failure rate. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a ✓, the opaque financial disclosure and zero operational track record render this opportunity highly speculative.

Premier Pools & Spas offers a relatively low total investment range of $58,950 to $119,000 with a moderate franchise fee of $45,000 and a low 3.5% royalty, making it an accessible entry point in the pool construction industry. ✓ The brand provides Item 19 financial disclosure, offering prospective franchisees critical performance data for evaluation. ⚠ However, the presence of litigation is a notable red flag that warrants careful due diligence, and the lack of reported outlet growth or closure data makes it difficult to assess the system's current scale or stability.

Long Island Bagel Cafe requires a significant total investment of $585,200 to $882,100, with a $35,000 franchise fee and a 5.0% royalty. ✓ The franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, indicating a clean legal and financial background. ⚠ However, the absence of data on total outlets, openings, and closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or unit-level stability. This lack of operational history is a critical red flag for potential franchisees.

Pizzeria Uno Corporation presents a high-risk profile due to the absence of Item 19 financial performance disclosures, leaving prospective franchisees without validated revenue or profit expectations. The total investment range is exceptionally wide at $206,500 to $2,483,500, indicating significant variability in unit type or location costs, while the $31,316 franchise fee and 5.0% royalty are moderate. ⚠ The lack of any outlet growth or closure data suggests either a dormant or very small system, making it impossible to assess operational stability or market traction. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a neutral point, but the complete lack of financial transparency and growth metrics makes this a speculative opportunity.

NerdsToGo presents a relatively low-cost entry point into the tech support franchise space, with a total investment ranging from $87,551 to $167,218 and a franchise fee of $24,875. ⚠ A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which warrants careful due diligence, and the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit-level revenue or profitability. ✓ The 7% royalty is standard for the service industry, but the absence of any outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to assess the brand's operational stability or market traction. Overall, this opportunity carries high uncertainty due to undisclosed financial performance and legal issues, making it a speculative investment.

RITA'S FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC presents a significant investment risk due to the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without validated earnings data to assess profitability. The total investment range of $199,005 to $915,536 is broad and relatively high, yet the franchise fee of $55,000 and 6.5% royalty are standard for the food sector. ⚠ The lack of any outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to evaluate the brand's operational stability or market traction. ✓ On a positive note, the company has no history of litigation or bankruptcy, which suggests a clean legal background.

Costa Vida Management LLC presents a franchise opportunity with significant informational gaps, as no data is available for total outlets, franchise fees, royalties, or total investment. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance representations means prospective franchisees cannot evaluate potential earnings or unit economics. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of growth data—with no outlets opened or closed last year—makes it impossible to assess the brand's trajectory or operational stability. This offering requires extensive due diligence to fill critical missing details before any investment consideration.

Comic Book Café enters the market with a substantial total investment range of $432,500 to $936,000 and a $35,000 franchise fee, positioning it as a significant capital commitment for a niche concept. ⚠ A major red flag is the complete absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, meaning there is no verifiable data on unit economics, revenue, or profitability for prospective franchisees. ✓ The franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, which is a positive sign for its legal standing. However, with no disclosed outlet counts or growth trajectory, this opportunity lacks the transparency needed for informed investment analysis.

Delah Coffee Franchising LLC offers an entry into the beverage sector with a moderate total investment range of $282,300 to $424,000 and a reasonable 4.5% royalty fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag, requiring potential franchisees to rely entirely on their own due diligence regarding unit-level economics. While the company reports no history of litigation or bankruptcy, the lack of disclosed outlet data makes it impossible to verify the brand's current scale or stability. ⚠ Prospective buyers should approach with caution given the inability to validate the system's growth trajectory or operational success.

Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill & Bar presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment ranging from $1.8M to $5.8M and a relatively low 4.0% royalty fee. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data is a significant transparency concern, making it impossible to validate unit-level economics or earnings potential. ⚠ The presence of both litigation and bankruptcy history further elevates risk, suggesting past operational or financial instability. Without disclosed outlet counts or growth data, this franchise offers limited visibility into its current scale or trajectory.

Fireside RV Franchising currently presents an unassessable market position due to a complete lack of operational data, including scale, costs, and unit counts. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential return on investment. ⚠ With no growth metrics or investment details available, this opportunity lacks the necessary transparency for a sound analysis.

Fantastic Sams presents a moderate entry point with a franchise fee of $10,000 and a total investment range of $171,500 to $462,000. ⚠ A significant red flag is the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profitability benchmarks. ✓ The brand carries no litigation or bankruptcy history, suggesting a clean legal standing. However, without outlet counts or growth data, it is impossible to assess the system's scale or trajectory, making this a high-risk, low-transparency opportunity.

Leo’s Pizzeria presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment ranging from $1,036,000 to $1,643,500, yet offers no Item 19 financial disclosure, making it impossible to validate unit-level profitability. ⚠ The absence of any outlet data—including total units, openings, or closures—raises significant concerns about the brand’s operational track record and scalability. ✓ On the positive side, the franchise fee is moderate at $25,000, the royalty is low at 3.5%, and there is no history of litigation or bankruptcy. However, without any disclosed growth or financial performance, this opportunity carries substantial uncertainty for prospective franchisees.

Benny's presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profit expectations. ⚠ The total investment range of $138,400 to $479,500 is significant, yet there is no disclosed outlet count or growth history to assess brand traction or stability. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a positive signal, but the lack of any operational scale or financial disclosure makes this a speculative investment. Without a track record of openings or closures, the brand's viability and franchisee success remain entirely unproven.

DEZ presents a low-cost entry point with a total investment range of $42,950 to $70,800 and a $29,000 franchise fee, but the absence of any disclosed outlet data, financial performance (Item 19), or growth history makes it impossible to assess its operational viability or market traction. ⚠ The lack of Item 19 is a significant red flag, as prospective franchisees have no validated revenue or profitability benchmarks to evaluate the business model. ✓ On the positive side, the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, which suggests a clean legal record. However, without any track record of openings or closures, this opportunity carries extreme uncertainty and should be approached with caution.

Launch Franchising represents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $3.5M to $6.5M, effectively restricting candidacy to high-net-worth individuals. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history offers basic corporate stability, but the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents a data-backed assessment of potential ROI. ⚠ Critical operational visibility is missing, as the company fails to disclose unit counts, royalty fees, or recent growth metrics, making this a speculative investment. ⚠

Pizza Amore presents a low-cost entry point with a franchise fee of $20,000 and total investment ranging from $96,200 to $167,250, making it accessible for first-time owners. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history offers some reassurance, but the complete lack of outlet data—including total units, openings, and closures—makes it impossible to assess brand scale, growth trajectory, or franchisee turnover. This franchise carries high uncertainty due to its opaque operational history and financial performance.

CleanStart Systems presents a high-risk profile due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees with no verifiable data on unit-level revenue or profitability. ⚠ The total investment range of $30,300 to $38,400 is low, but the 10% royalty fee is steep relative to the modest startup cost, potentially squeezing margins. With no reported outlets opened or closed, and no litigation or bankruptcy history, the brand appears to be either very new or pre-revenue, offering no track record for growth or stability. ✓ The lack of legal issues is a minor positive, but the lack of financial performance data makes this an exceptionally speculative investment.

Ziebart Corporation requires a significant total investment ranging from $370,820 to $924,000, with a $45,000 franchise fee and an 8.0% royalty. ✓ The presence of Item 19 financial disclosure provides prospective franchisees with critical performance data to evaluate potential earnings. ⚠ However, the existence of litigation is a notable red flag that warrants careful due diligence. The lack of data on total outlets and recent openings or closures makes it difficult to assess the brand's current scale and growth trajectory.

CAR-X, LLC operates with a moderate entry cost, requiring a $30,000 franchise fee and total investment between $330,200 and $527,000, with a 5.0% royalty. ⚠ A significant red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial performance data, making it impossible to assess potential revenue or profitability. ✓ The franchise has no history of litigation or bankruptcy, which suggests a clean legal record. However, the lack of outlet growth or closure data prevents any evaluation of the brand's operational stability or market traction.

Timber Pizza Company enters the market with a moderate entry cost, requiring a franchise fee of $25,000 and a total investment ranging from $467,500 to $920,500, with a 6.0% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating unit-level financial performance. ⚠ Furthermore, with no data on total outlets, recent openings, or closures, the brand’s operational scale and growth trajectory remain entirely unverifiable.

Holiday Stationstores requires a substantial total investment ranging from $3.4 million to $7.7 million, with a $25,000 franchise fee and a 3.5% royalty. ⚠ A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which introduces legal risk for prospective franchisees. The absence of Item 19 financial performance data makes it impossible to evaluate potential revenue or profitability, adding further uncertainty. Without any disclosed outlet growth or closure data, the brand's current operational trajectory and stability remain unclear.

SNAPOLOGY presents a wide investment range of $75,250 to $632,250, with a $40,000 franchise fee and a 7.0% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed outlet counts and growth data makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale or trajectory, which is a significant information gap for potential investors.

The Inspection Boys presents a high-risk profile with a steep $150,000 franchise fee and total investment reaching $313,000, yet offers no Item 19 financial performance disclosure to justify this cost. ⚠ The absence of any outlet growth data, combined with active litigation, signals significant operational and legal uncertainties. ✓ The lack of bankruptcy history provides a minor positive, but the overall lack of scale and transparency makes this a speculative investment. Prospective franchisees should demand audited financials and clarity on the litigation before proceeding.

Con Azucar Café enters the market with a moderate-to-high entry barrier, requiring a $50,000 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $190,500 to $572,500, coupled with a 6.0% royalty. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating unit-level profitability or revenue benchmarks. ✓ The franchise has no history of litigation or bankruptcy, which provides a clean legal foundation. However, with no disclosed outlet data—including total units, openings, or closures—the brand’s operational scale and growth trajectory remain entirely opaque, making it a high-risk opportunity for investors seeking transparency.

Wetzel's Pretzels operates without publicly available financial performance data in its FDD, as it does not provide an Item 19 disclosure, which is a significant ⚠ limitation for prospective franchisees evaluating potential returns. The franchise also lacks reported outlet counts, growth figures, or closure data, making it impossible to assess its scale or trajectory. While there are no litigation or bankruptcy red flags, the absence of key operational metrics and investment cost details creates a high degree of uncertainty for investors.

Massage Heights presents a significant analytical challenge due to the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, making it impossible to assess unit-level economics or validate the business model. ✓ The franchise benefits from a clean legal and bankruptcy record, suggesting no major corporate-level distress. ⚠ However, the lack of any disclosure on total investment, franchise fee, royalty, or outlet counts (including openings and closures) creates an opaque investment profile that prevents any meaningful evaluation of scale or growth trajectory. Prospective franchisees should demand this critical data before proceeding.

EYEMAZY FRANCHISING USA INC. presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profitability data. The franchise fee is relatively low at $9,900, but the 9.0% royalty is steep for a concept with no disclosed total investment range or outlet count. ⚠ The lack of any operational history, outlet openings, or closures makes it impossible to assess brand traction or failure rates. ✓ No litigation or bankruptcy history provides a clean legal slate, but the complete lack of scale and financial transparency is a significant red flag.