Companies

Mike’s Red Tacos presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of any operational history, financial performance data (Item 19), or disclosed outlet counts, making it impossible to assess real-world viability. ✓ The franchise fee is moderate at $40,000, and there are no litigation or bankruptcy concerns. ⚠ However, the total investment range of $619,800 to $1,953,000 is substantial for a concept with zero proven track record, and the lack of any outlet openings or closures raises serious questions about the brand’s market presence and growth trajectory. This franchise is essentially an untested concept requiring significant capital commitment with no evidence of success.

PAINTER1 presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without validated revenue or profitability data. The franchise fee of $49,500 and total investment range of $80,270 to $168,380 are moderate, but the lack of any outlet count or growth data makes it impossible to assess brand traction or stability. ✓ No litigation or bankruptcy history provides a clean legal slate, but ⚠ the complete absence of operational scale and financial performance metrics is a significant red flag. This franchise requires extensive independent due diligence to determine if any existing units are operating successfully.

PREMIERGARAGE enters the market with a moderate investment range of $177k to $271k and a relatively low franchise fee of $16,958, though the 5% royalty is standard for the automotive sector. ✓ The brand offers an Item 19 financial disclosure, providing prospective franchisees with some performance data for evaluation. ⚠ However, the presence of litigation in the franchise's history is a notable red flag that warrants careful due diligence. The lack of disclosed outlet counts and growth data makes it difficult to assess the system's scale or recent performance trajectory.

Slumberland operates with a high entry barrier, requiring a total investment ranging from $829,500 to $3,215,000 and a $45,000 franchise fee, paired with a low 3.0% royalty. ⚠ A significant red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without critical performance data to assess profitability. The lack of reported outlet counts for openings, closures, or total scale makes it impossible to evaluate growth trajectory or system stability. ✓ The franchise has no history of litigation or bankruptcy, which provides some baseline reassurance, but the opaque financial picture demands extreme caution.

SPEC presents an extreme outlier in franchise investment, with a total investment range of $577.6 million to over $2 billion, making it one of the most capital-intensive opportunities available. ✓ The franchise fee is a relatively modest $49,000, and the 6% royalty is standard, but the astronomical startup costs suggest a massive infrastructure or real estate requirement. ⚠ A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which warrants careful due diligence, especially given the lack of disclosed outlet growth or closure data. Without any historical outlet performance or expansion figures, the financial disclosure (Item 19) is critical to assess, but the sheer scale of investment makes this a high-stakes venture suitable only for institutional or ultra-high-net-worth investors.

NAMKEEN presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without validated revenue or profitability data. The total investment range of $271,900 to $640,000 is substantial, yet the franchise fee is a moderate $35,000 with a 6% royalty. ⚠ The lack of any outlet data—including total units, openings, or closures—makes it impossible to assess brand scale or growth trajectory. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a minor positive, but the complete lack of operational transparency is a significant red flag.

Aurelio's Is Pizza Franchise, Ltd. presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $437,904 to $1.25 million and a $49,000 franchise fee ✓. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive indicator ✓, the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback for prospective investors ⚠. Additionally, the unavailability of outlet count and growth data makes it difficult to assess the brand's current scale and market trajectory ⚠.

Red Mango FC, LLC presents a high-risk profile due to the absence of Item 19 financial performance data and the presence of litigation, which prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or growth trajectory. The total investment range of $106,500 to $556,500 is broad, suggesting significant variability in build-out costs, while the $15,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty are moderate. ⚠ The lack of any disclosed outlet counts or year-over-year changes makes it impossible to evaluate the brand's scale or recent expansion trends. ⚠ Without financial disclosures or a clear track record, this opportunity carries substantial uncertainty for prospective franchisees.

ESCAPE ENTERPRISES, LTD. presents a high-risk investment profile due to the absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profitability benchmarks. The total investment range of $239,500 to $828,500 is substantial, yet the lack of disclosed outlet counts, growth, or closure data makes it impossible to assess the brand's operational scale or market traction. ✓ No litigation or bankruptcy history is a positive signal, but ⚠ the complete absence of royalty information and any outlet performance metrics creates significant uncertainty around the business model's viability and long-term sustainability.

Skinnypizza Franchise Systems presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving franchisees without any validated revenue or profit data. The total investment range of $270,500 to $568,000 is substantial for a concept with no disclosed outlet count or growth history, creating significant uncertainty. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy filings is a neutral positive, but ⚠ the lack of any operational scale or historical outlet openings/closures makes it impossible to assess brand viability or unit-level economics. Prospective franchisees should demand audited financial data before considering this unproven investment.

MarieBelle enters the franchise market with a relatively high entry barrier, requiring a total investment between $305,000 and $469,500 plus a $35,000 franchise fee and a 5% royalty. ⚠ A significant red flag is the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, making it impossible to assess unit-level profitability or validate the brand's business model. ✓ On the positive side, the company has no litigation or bankruptcy history, suggesting a clean legal background. However, with no disclosed outlet counts or growth trajectory, this opportunity carries substantial uncertainty for prospective franchisees.

My Backyard Sports presents a significant risk profile due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated data on unit-level revenue or profitability. The total investment range of $104,392 to $180,685 is moderate, but the $54,900 franchise fee is relatively high for a concept with no disclosed operating history or outlet count. ⚠ The lack of any reported outlets opened or closed in the last year suggests the brand may be pre-revenue or has stalled in its development. Without any financial performance representation or track record, this opportunity carries substantial uncertainty and should be approached with extreme caution.

Image One Facility Solutions presents a high-risk opportunity with a low barrier to entry, requiring a total investment of $49,900 to $72,049 and a franchise fee of $39,750. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit economics or revenue potential, making it impossible to assess profitability. ⚠ The presence of litigation history is a significant red flag, and the lack of any outlet growth or closure data prevents evaluation of the brand's stability or market traction. This franchise should be approached with extreme caution due to the complete lack of financial transparency and unresolved legal issues.

Surf'N'Fries USA, LLC presents a high-risk investment opportunity due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, meaning there is no verifiable data on unit revenue, profitability, or franchisee performance. ⚠ The franchise fee is low at $15,000, but the total investment range is exceptionally wide ($57,600 - $522,300), suggesting a lack of standardized business model clarity. ✓ There are no current litigation or bankruptcy filings against the company, which is a neutral positive. However, with no reported outlets opened or closed in the last year and no total outlet count, this franchise appears to be either pre-revenue or extremely nascent, offering no track record for prospective franchisees to evaluate.

Smash Franchising LLC presents a significant information gap for potential investors, as the FDD lacks critical data on total outlets, franchise fees, royalties, and total investment. The absence of Item 19 financial disclosure is a major ⚠ red flag, preventing any assessment of unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. While there are no reported litigation or bankruptcy issues, the complete lack of operational scale and growth metrics makes it impossible to evaluate the franchise's market traction or stability. This offering is essentially a blind investment, requiring extreme caution until comprehensive financial and operational data is provided.

MultiVista Systems is an inactive franchise with no operational data available, making any assessment of its viability or performance impossible. The total investment range of $232,825 to $651,650 is substantial, yet there is no Item 19 financial disclosure to evaluate potential returns or profitability. ⚠ The absence of any outlet growth or closure figures, combined with the inactive status, signals a high-risk opportunity with no track record to analyze. This franchise should be approached with extreme caution, as the lack of transparency and operational history outweighs the absence of litigation or bankruptcy filings.

EasyVet Holdings, LLC presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profit benchmarks. The total investment range of $161,000 to $327,000 is moderate for a veterinary concept, but the lack of any disclosed outlet counts or growth history makes it impossible to assess brand traction or unit-level economics. ⚠ The absence of both opened and closed outlet data is a significant red flag, suggesting the franchise may be pre-revenue or has not yet established a proven operational track record. Without financial disclosures or a network of existing locations, this offering carries substantial uncertainty for investors.

Snooze International presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $270,700 to $859,600, though the lack of scale data makes it difficult to assess market penetration. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, and the $49,900 fee is standard for the segment. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an analysis of unit economics, and missing outlet counts obscure the brand's actual growth trajectory.

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. presents a moderate entry point with a total investment range of $47,042 to $260,437, though the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant ⚠ red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating potential earnings or performance benchmarks. The franchise has no reported litigation or bankruptcy history, which is a ✓ positive indicator of legal and financial stability. However, the lack of data on total outlets, franchise fees, royalties, and recent growth or closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's current scale, market traction, or franchisee turnover. This opaque disclosure profile suggests a high-risk opportunity that demands extensive independent due diligence before any commitment.

SFC Estate CoachingTM presents a low-cost entry point with a total investment of $41,450 to $51,450 and a $25,000 franchise fee, but the absence of any operational history or Item 19 financial disclosure is a critical red flag. ⚠ The lack of any opened or closed outlets, combined with no data on total units, means there is zero proven track record or growth trajectory to evaluate. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a minor positive, but it offers no insight into the business's viability. This franchise is essentially a concept with no validation, making it a high-risk proposition for prospective franchisees.

Museum of Illusions presents a high-risk investment opportunity due to its exceptionally wide and capital-intensive total investment range of $1,935,500 to $6,552,500. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit-level revenue or profitability, making it impossible to assess the potential return on this substantial outlay. ✓ While the brand has no litigation or bankruptcy history, the lack of any disclosed outlet counts or growth trajectory creates a significant information vacuum for prospective franchisees. This offering demands extreme caution, as the high entry cost is paired with zero transparency on operational performance or franchisee success.

Belle Journée Bakery enters the market with a moderate-to-high investment range of $349,500 to $900,000, supported by a $60,000 franchise fee and a 6% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history suggests a clean legal and financial background, while the inclusion of Item 19 provides prospective franchisees with critical financial performance data. ⚠ However, the complete lack of disclosed outlet counts—both total and annual openings/closures—raises significant concerns about the brand's operational scale and growth trajectory. This opacity makes it difficult to assess unit-level viability or system momentum, representing a key risk for potential investors.

Kung Fu Tea enters the franchise market with a moderate investment range of $169,000 to $378,000 and a $59,000 franchise fee. ⚠ A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which introduces legal risk for prospective franchisees. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance representations means there is no verifiable data on unit economics, revenue, or profitability. Without outlet counts or growth figures, it is impossible to assess the brand's scale or operational stability.

Monkburger Franchise Group LLC presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profitability data. The total investment range of $749,500 to $3,435,000 is substantial, yet there is no disclosed royalty fee or outlet count to gauge operational scale or ongoing costs. With no outlets opened or closed in the last year and no litigation or bankruptcy history, the brand appears to be in a pre-launch or very early stage, offering no track record for growth trajectory. ⚠ The lack of financial disclosure and operational history makes this a speculative venture that demands extensive independent due diligence.

House of Colour presents a low-cost entry point with a total investment range of $33,345 to $64,260 and a $30,000 franchise fee, making it accessible for individual operators. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of Item 19 financial performance data and undisclosed royalty fees create significant uncertainty around potential earnings and ongoing costs. ⚠ Without any disclosed outlet counts or growth trajectory, it is impossible to assess the brand's scale or market traction.

SAH Holdings, LLC presents a highly unusual franchise opportunity with a $0 franchise fee and no ongoing royalty, which is a significant positive for franchisee cash flow. However, the total investment range of $6,600 to $117,470 is extremely wide, suggesting a lack of standardized business model or unit type, which introduces operational risk. The absence of any outlet data—total units, openings, or closures—makes it impossible to assess brand traction, growth trajectory, or system stability. ✓ No litigation or bankruptcy history is a clean slate, but ⚠ the complete lack of operational scale and transparency is a major red flag for prospective franchisees.

Apogee Learning LLC currently lacks the operational scale and financial transparency required for a verifiable franchise assessment. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, combined with N/A metrics for investment costs and outlet counts, prevents a clear analysis of unit economics and growth trajectory. ⚠ Prospective investors face significant information asymmetry and should proceed with extreme caution given the lack of performance data.

European Wax Center requires a substantial total investment ranging from $327,600 to $836,950, with a $45,000 franchise fee. ⚠ A significant red flag is the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profit data to assess potential returns. ✓ The brand has no history of litigation or bankruptcy, suggesting a clean legal and financial background. However, the lack of outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to evaluate the system's current scale or trajectory.

Gulf C-Store presents a high-risk investment profile due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees with no verifiable data on potential revenue or profitability. The total investment range of $147,650 to $651,550 is substantial, yet the franchise lacks any operational history or growth metrics, as no outlets have been opened or closed in the past year. ⚠ The lack of a proven track record, combined with a $25,000 franchise fee and a 5.5% royalty, makes this an unproven concept with significant financial uncertainty. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a minor positive, but it does little to offset the fundamental risk of investing in a franchise with zero disclosed performance data.

InXpress operates as a non-asset-based logistics and shipping franchise, offering a business model with lower overhead compared to traditional retail operations. ⚠ The total absence of financial performance data (Item 19) and key metrics regarding unit count or investment cost creates significant opacity for prospective buyers. Without verified data on system size or recent growth trajectories, potential investors cannot accurately assess market penetration or unit viability.

Valenta Franchise, LLC presents a challenging investment case due to a complete lack of operational transparency, with critical data points regarding scale, fees, and unit performance all listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents prospective franchisees from validating the economic viability or potential return on investment of the business model. ✓ The clean legal record regarding litigation and bankruptcy is a positive indicator of corporate stability. ⚠ However, the inability to track growth trajectory or outlet turnover makes it impossible to assess the health and momentum of the system.

Mosquito Marry's presents a low-cost entry point with a total investment range of $69,850 to $129,100 and a $39,500 franchise fee, making it accessible for individual operators. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating any historical revenue or profitability data. The lack of reported outlet counts, growth, or closures further obscures the brand's operational scale and trajectory. Without financial performance benchmarks or a proven unit count, this opportunity carries substantial uncertainty for investors.

Pastanito enters the market with a substantial total investment range of $467,000 to $507,000 and a $40,500 franchise fee, positioning it as a significant capital commitment. ✓ The franchise provides an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering prospective franchisees critical performance data for evaluation, and has a clean legal record with no litigation or bankruptcy history. ⚠ However, the absence of any outlet data—including total units, openings, and closures—creates a major information gap, making it impossible to assess the brand's operational scale, growth trajectory, or system stability. This lack of transparency is a notable risk for potential investors.

Oap Franchises presents a significant risk profile due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated data on unit-level revenue or profitability. The total investment range of $132,800 to $247,000, combined with a $45,000 franchise fee and a 6% royalty, is a substantial commitment for a concept with no disclosed operating history or outlet count. ⚠ The lack of any information on total outlets, openings, or closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or franchisee turnover. Without any financial performance representation or operational track record, this opportunity carries exceptionally high uncertainty and should be approached with extreme caution.

C.L. Tax & Accounting Service, LLC presents a high-cost entry with a $35,000 franchise fee and 12.5% royalty against a total investment of $58,600 to $92,300. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data prevents any assessment of potential earnings or franchisee profitability. ⚠ With no disclosed outlet counts, openings, or closures, the brand’s operational scale and growth trajectory remain entirely opaque. This combination of high fees, no financial disclosure, and zero transparency on unit economics signals significant risk for prospective franchisees.

Mastercare Franchising, LLC presents a moderate-cost entry point with a franchise fee of $45,000 and total investment ranging from $125,800 to $223,450. ✓ The franchise provides Item 19 financial disclosure, offering transparency on potential performance, and has no litigation or bankruptcy history, indicating a clean legal record. ⚠ However, the absence of data on total outlets, openings, and closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or unit-level stability. This lack of operational history is a significant risk for prospective franchisees evaluating the system's viability.

Musicologie enters the market with a premium positioning, evidenced by a $60,000 franchise fee and a total investment range of $190,925 to $363,625, which is high for a music education concept. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history provides a clean legal slate, and the inclusion of Item 19 financial disclosure offers transparency for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the lack of any outlet data—including total units, openings, and closures—is a significant red flag, making it impossible to assess the brand's operational track record or growth trajectory. This absence of scale and performance history suggests a very early-stage or pre-revenue franchise opportunity, carrying substantial execution risk.

Oakberry presents a high-risk opportunity given the absence of Item 19 financial performance data and the presence of litigation, which are significant red flags for prospective franchisees. The total investment range of $65,000 to $300,000 is relatively low, but the $30,000 franchise fee and 6.0% royalty are standard for the food sector. ⚠ The lack of disclosed outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to assess the brand's operational stability or market traction. Without financial substantiation, this franchise should be approached with extreme caution.

Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. presents a high-risk profile given its active litigation and a very wide investment range of $126,297 to $824,888, which suggests significant variability in build-out costs. ⚠ The presence of litigation is a notable red flag, while the absence of outlet growth data makes it impossible to assess recent unit-level momentum. ✓ The relatively low $27,500 franchise fee and 5% royalty are positive cost structures, but the lack of transparency on closures and openings raises concerns about system stability. This franchise requires careful due diligence on the litigation details and a clear understanding of the cost drivers behind the high-end investment estimate.

Five Flavors Franchising presents an exceptionally wide investment range of $205,167 to $3.2 million, creating significant ambiguity regarding the operational model and required capital. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an assessment of potential profitability, while the lack of scale data makes it impossible to evaluate the system's stability or growth trajectory. ⚠ With no data on outlets opened or closed, prospective franchisees face high risk due to a complete lack of performance transparency.

This franchise presents a clean background with no history of litigation or bankruptcy (✓), but the total lack of performance data makes a thorough risk assessment impossible (⚠). The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, combined with missing data on costs, fees, and unit counts, creates significant transparency issues for prospective investors (⚠). Without verified metrics on scale or recent outlet activity, this opportunity currently lacks the necessary evidence to demonstrate stability or growth trajectory (⚠).

Right at Home, LLC offers a relatively low-cost entry point in the senior care space with a total investment ranging from $92,100 to $165,309 and a 5.0% royalty fee. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history suggests a clean legal and financial record. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed outlet counts and growth data makes it impossible to assess the system's scale or recent performance trends. This absence of operational transparency is a significant concern for prospective franchisees evaluating the brand's stability.

Skedaddle Franchising LLC presents a significant data visibility risk, as critical metrics regarding unit count, fees, and total investment are currently listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further complicates any attempt to model potential ROI or validate the business model's economic viability. ⚠ While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a basic positive ✓, the franchise lacks the scale and transparency required for a thorough investment assessment.

Infinilush Company Limited presents a franchise opportunity with no available data on its scale, investment costs, or financial performance, as it lacks an Item 19 disclosure. ⚠ The absence of any outlet counts, franchise fees, or royalty structures makes it impossible to assess its business model or growth trajectory. ✓ The company has no reported litigation or bankruptcy history, which is a neutral but not reassuring factor given the complete lack of operational transparency. This franchise should be approached with extreme caution until comprehensive financial and operational details are provided.

This franchise presents a severe lack of transparency, with critical data regarding scale, fees, and total investment all listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any meaningful validation of potential ROI, making it impossible to conduct a standard risk assessment. ⚠ While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive sign, the missing operational and financial metrics render this opportunity effectively un-analyzable in its current state.

All County Property Management Franchise presents a significant transparency risk for investors, as critical data regarding total investment, fees, and unit count is currently unavailable. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 Financial Performance Representation further complicates due diligence, making it impossible to benchmark potential ROI or operational viability. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy history offers a clean legal baseline, but the severe data limitations make this opportunity difficult to analyze compared to better-established competitors.

Trademark Collection presents a significant analytical challenge due to a complete lack of operational data, including total outlets, franchise fees, royalties, and investment ranges. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a major ⚠ red flag, as it prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. With no reported openings or closures, the brand's growth trajectory and stability are entirely opaque. While the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, the total information vacuum makes it impossible to evaluate the opportunity's viability or risk profile.

GolfTRK Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of any operational history or financial performance data (Item 19), making it impossible to validate revenue or profitability. The total investment range of $298,950 to $675,000 is substantial for a concept with zero disclosed outlets, and the 7% royalty fee adds significant ongoing cost without proven unit economics. ⚠ The lack of any opened or closed outlets indicates this is a pre-revenue franchise offering, meaning early franchisees would be beta-testing the business model. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral factor, but it does not offset the fundamental risk of investing in an unproven system.

Express Modular Franchising LLC currently lacks the operational scale and data transparency required for a thorough franchise assessment, as critical metrics regarding units, fees, and total investment are all listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag, preventing any validation of the business model’s profitability or ROI. ✓ The clean legal record regarding litigation and bankruptcy is a positive indicator, but the overall growth trajectory remains impossible to determine without performance data.

City Publications Franchise Group, Inc. presents a high-risk profile due to a complete lack of transparency regarding its scale, costs, and unit economics. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any objective validation of potential profitability, while the "N/A" status for outlet counts suggests the system may lack a proven operational track record. ⚠ With no data available on recent growth or closures, prospective investors have no empirical basis to assess market demand or stability.