Companies

Joe Homebuyer presents a high-risk opportunity with an exceptionally wide investment range of $131,200 to $4,443,500, suggesting significant variability in business models or real estate markets. ⚠ A major red flag is the founder's bankruptcy history, which raises concerns about financial stability and management experience. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit profitability or revenue, making it impossible to assess potential returns. ✓ The lack of litigation is a minor positive, but the lack of any outlet growth or closure data leaves the franchise's operational track record completely opaque.

Rosati's Pizza Enterprises, Inc. presents a high-risk opportunity due to a complete lack of Item 19 financial performance disclosures and missing data regarding total outlet counts and investment costs. ⚠ The absence of transparent financial metrics makes it impossible to verify unit-level economics or the system's current scale. While the company reports no active litigation or bankruptcy history, the unavailability of growth data and franchise fee structures suggests limited franchising activity or a corporate focus on company-owned stores. ⚠ Potential investors should approach with extreme caution given the inability to assess the total capital required or the brand's expansion trajectory.

MosquitoNix enters the market with a relatively low total investment range of $121,400 to $157,400 and a $72,000 franchise fee, making it accessible for entry-level investors. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of Item 19 financial performance data is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. ⚠ Without disclosed outlet counts or growth data, it is impossible to assess the brand's scale or trajectory, leaving investors with an opaque opportunity.

Mr. Sandless presents a high-cost entry point with a franchise fee of $915,000 and total investment ranging from $2.7 million to $8.4 million, positioning it as a significant capital commitment. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history suggests a clean legal and financial background, and the inclusion of Item 19 provides prospective franchisees with financial performance data. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed outlet counts for openings, closings, or total units makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or franchisee turnover, which are critical red flags for evaluating operational stability. This opaque operational history, combined with the steep investment, demands rigorous due diligence before proceeding.

Port of Subs presents a significant investment opportunity with a total cost range of $419,895 to $856,875 and a $41,500 franchise fee, but the absence of Item 19 financial performance data is a major ⚠ red flag, as prospective franchisees cannot assess unit-level profitability. The lack of disclosed outlet counts, openings, or closures makes it impossible to evaluate the brand's scale or growth trajectory. While the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history ✓, the complete opacity around financials and operational metrics suggests a high-risk venture requiring extensive independent due diligence.

Gamers Heaven presents a high-risk investment opportunity with a significant capital requirement ranging from $495,800 to $934,400, yet it offers no Item 19 financial performance disclosure, leaving potential franchisees without any validated revenue or profitability data. ⚠ The absence of any historical outlet data, including openings or closures, makes it impossible to assess the brand's growth trajectory or operational stability. ✓ While the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, the lack of a proven track record and the high entry cost create substantial uncertainty. This franchise is best suited for investors willing to accept a speculative venture with no financial benchmarks to guide their decision.

Nothing Bundt Cakes requires a substantial total investment ranging from $667,100 to $1,032,500, yet the absence of Item 19 financial performance data prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or return on investment. ⚠ A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which introduces legal and operational uncertainty for prospective franchisees. ✓ The brand has no history of bankruptcy, offering some financial stability, but the lack of outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to evaluate the system's expansion trajectory or franchisee turnover. This franchise presents a high-cost entry with opaque financials and unresolved legal issues, demanding extensive due diligence before commitment.

CMY Franchising, LLC presents a challenging investment case due to a complete lack of operational transparency and scale. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any verification of unit economics or profitability, while the "N/A" status for outlet counts suggests the system may lack an established operating history. ⚠ With no data available on franchise fees, royalties, or recent growth, the risk profile for this opportunity is exceptionally high.

Global Recruiters Network presents a significant information gap for prospective franchisees, as the absence of Item 19 financial performance representations means there is no verifiable data on unit economics or earnings potential. ⚠ The lack of any disclosed outlet counts, franchise fees, or investment ranges makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, startup costs, or growth trajectory. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a neutral factor, the complete lack of operational and financial transparency is a major red flag. This franchise opportunity requires extensive independent due diligence to uncover any historical performance or operational framework before consideration.

Wings Etc Inc. presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving potential franchisees without validated earnings data. The franchise fee is a moderate $20,000, but the total investment range is exceptionally wide at $368,650 to $2,881,100, suggesting significant variability in build-out costs. ⚠ The lack of any outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to assess the brand's operational stability or market traction. Without financial performance benchmarks or historical unit counts, this franchise offers no basis for a data-driven investment decision.

Savannah Seafood Shack presents a high-risk investment due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated data on potential revenue or profitability. The total investment range of $283,400 to $804,600 is substantial, yet the franchise has no operating outlets or historical growth data to demonstrate concept viability. ⚠ The lack of any outlet openings or closures suggests this is either a brand-new or pre-revenue franchise, making it an unproven venture. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a minor positive, but it does little to offset the significant uncertainty surrounding the business model.

Furry Land presents a high-risk profile given its lack of Item 19 financial performance data and the presence of litigation, which obscures any potential return on investment. The total investment range of $136,477 to $309,177 is moderate, but the $65,000 franchise fee is relatively steep for a concept with no disclosed outlet count or growth trajectory. ⚠ The absence of any historical outlet openings or closures makes it impossible to assess unit-level viability or brand momentum. ✓ The lack of bankruptcy is a minor positive, but the overall opacity and legal issues make this a speculative opportunity.

Fit Body Boot Camp, Inc. presents a moderate-to-high entry cost with a total investment range of $157,250 to $448,400, yet offers no Item 19 financial disclosure, which is a significant ⚠ red flag for prospective franchisees seeking validated performance data. The absence of any reported litigation or bankruptcy is a ✓ positive indicator of corporate stability, but the lack of outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to assess the brand's actual scale or franchisee turnover. Without historical expansion figures or financial benchmarks, this opportunity carries considerable uncertainty, requiring extensive independent validation before any commitment.

Belgo Franchisor LLC presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated earnings data. ✓ The franchise fee is relatively low at $15,000, but the total investment range of $211,850 to $492,700 is substantial for a brand with no disclosed outlet count or growth history. ⚠ The lack of any operational scale, combined with no data on openings or closures, makes it impossible to assess unit-level viability or market traction. Without litigation or bankruptcy filings, the primary red flag remains the opaque financial disclosure, which demands extreme caution from investors.

The Max Challenge presents a moderate entry point with a franchise fee of $30,250 and total investment ranging from $151,028 to $349,478. ✓ The brand provides an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering transparency on potential performance, and has no history of litigation or bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the absence of data on total outlets, recent openings, and closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's current scale or growth trajectory. This lack of operational history is a significant concern, as it prevents evaluation of unit-level stability and market demand.

Sigri Indian BBQ presents a high-risk profile given its lack of operational scale, absence of financial performance disclosures (Item 19), and the presence of both litigation and bankruptcy history. The total investment range of $166,950 to $469,833 is significant for a concept with no reported outlet growth or closures, making it impossible to assess unit-level viability. ⚠ The combination of legal and financial distress flags, alongside a $25,000 franchise fee with no stated royalty, suggests potential instability or a pre-revenue stage. Without any track record or transparency, this opportunity carries substantial uncertainty for prospective franchisees.

Carre d'artistes presents a high-risk profile with a moderate entry cost of $35,000 franchise fee and total investment up to $512,500. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data prevents any assessment of unit profitability, while the presence of litigation is a significant red flag. ✓ The brand has no bankruptcy history, but the lack of outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to gauge operational stability or market traction. This franchise offers no verifiable financial track record, making it unsuitable for risk-averse investors.

Snowdays Franchise, LLC presents a significant risk profile due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated data on unit-level revenue or profitability. ⚠ The total investment range of $108,300 to $352,600 is substantial for a concept with zero disclosed operating history, as no outlets opened or closed in the last year were reported. ✓ The franchise benefits from a clean legal record with no litigation or bankruptcy history, and the $30,000 franchise fee is moderate. However, without any track record of unit growth or financial benchmarks, this opportunity carries exceptionally high uncertainty for investors.

ABBEY CARPET CO., INC. presents a low-cost entry point with a total investment range of $23,050 to $61,900 and a modest $10,000 franchise fee. ⚠ However, the absence of Item 19 financial performance data and any disclosed outlet counts makes it impossible to assess unit economics or growth trajectory. ⚠ The presence of litigation is a notable red flag that warrants further due diligence. ✓ The low investment threshold may appeal to cost-conscious entrepreneurs, but the lack of operational scale and financial transparency introduces significant uncertainty.

Elder-Well presents a high-risk profile due to the complete absence of key operational data, including total outlets, franchise fees, royalties, and investment ranges. ✓ The franchise does provide an Item 19 financial disclosure, which is a positive sign for transparency, and it has no history of litigation or bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the lack of any outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to assess the brand's market traction or stability. Prospective franchisees should demand full disclosure of unit economics and operational history before proceeding.

Floors To Go, LLC presents a low-cost entry point with a total investment range of $23,050 to $61,900 and a modest $10,000 franchise fee, making it accessible for budget-conscious entrepreneurs. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating any historical revenue or profitability data. The lack of reported outlet counts, growth, or closures further obscures the brand's operational scale and trajectory. Without this critical performance data, the opportunity carries substantial uncertainty and requires extensive independent validation before any commitment.

SelectQuote Local Insurance Services, LLC presents a high-risk profile with a steep $55,000 franchise fee and a 20.0% royalty, yet the total investment range of $73,500 to $113,500 is relatively low. ⚠ A major red flag is the presence of litigation, which raises concerns about franchisee relations or business practices. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data makes it impossible to validate potential earnings or agent productivity. ✓ The lack of any outlet openings or closures suggests this is a very new or dormant franchise system, offering no track record for prospective franchisees to evaluate.

Baba's Halal Franchise presents a low-cost entry point with a total investment range of $86,000 to $221,800 and a modest $35,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating any historical unit-level performance or profitability. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history provides a clean legal slate, but the complete lack of data on total outlets, openings, or closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale or growth trajectory. This opportunity carries high uncertainty due to the total absence of financial performance data and operational track record.

Blinds Brothers presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without validated revenue or profitability data. ✓ The relatively low total investment range of $102,557 to $129,212 and a moderate 7% royalty may appeal to cost-conscious buyers, but the lack of any outlet count or historical growth data makes it impossible to assess brand traction or stability. ⚠ Without litigation or bankruptcy filings, the primary red flag is the complete opacity around unit performance and expansion, which is unusual for an established system. This franchise is best suited for investors willing to operate without financial benchmarks and who prioritize a low entry cost over proven business metrics.

Scoop Soldiers Franchise Company LLC presents a high-growth opportunity with 87,107 total outlets, though the massive scale suggests a mix of corporate and franchise units. ✓ The franchise fee is $39,500 with a total investment range of $68,600 to $395,300, offering a relatively accessible entry point for many investors. ⚠ However, the 8.0% royalty is on the higher side, and the presence of litigation is a notable red flag that warrants careful due diligence. The lack of data on outlets opened or closed last year makes it difficult to assess recent growth trajectory or unit-level turnover.

Keystone Insurers Group LLC presents a significant red flag due to ongoing litigation, which introduces considerable uncertainty for prospective franchisees. The absence of Item 19 financial performance data makes it impossible to evaluate potential earnings or validate the business model. With no disclosed franchise fee, total investment, or outlet growth figures, the franchise lacks the transparency needed for a standard risk assessment. ⚠ The litigation and lack of financial disclosure are critical concerns that outweigh any potential benefits.

Crave Cookies Franchising presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without validated revenue or profitability data. The total investment range of $327,985 to $734,800 is substantial for a cookie concept, yet the franchise lacks any disclosed outlet count or growth trajectory, making it impossible to assess scale or market traction. ✓ No litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral positive, but ⚠ the complete lack of operational history and financial performance data is a significant red flag. Without any outlets opened or closed in the last year, this franchise appears to be in a pre-revenue or extremely early stage, demanding extreme caution.

AMRAMP, LLC presents a high-risk investment opportunity due to the complete absence of financial performance representations (Item 19), leaving prospective franchisees without any data on potential revenue or profitability. The total investment range of $138,397 to $234,866 is significant, yet there is no disclosed information on franchise fees, royalty rates, or outlet growth, making it impossible to assess the brand's operational scale or market traction. ⚠ The lack of any outlet counts or historical growth data is a major red flag, as it prevents evaluation of the system's stability or expansion trajectory. While the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, the total lack of financial and operational transparency makes this a speculative venture unsuitable for risk-averse investors.

Elmer’s Breakfast ⋅ Lunch ⋅ Dinner presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment range of $1.1M to $4.7M and a $40,000 franchise fee, paired with a moderate 4.0% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed outlet counts and growth data makes it impossible to assess scale, unit economics, or franchisee success rates. This absence of operational transparency is a significant risk for prospective investors.

Meltwich USA enters the market with a moderate franchise fee of $30,000 and a 6.0% royalty, but the total investment range of $263,750 to $1,556,000 is exceptionally wide, suggesting significant variability in build-out costs. ✓ The presence of Item 19 financial disclosure provides some transparency for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the disclosure of litigation is a notable red flag that warrants careful due diligence. With no data on total outlets or recent openings and closures, the brand's current scale and growth trajectory remain unclear.

Real Hot Yoga presents a high-cost entry point with a $49,000 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $158,800 to $240,100, coupled with a 7.0% royalty. ⚠ A significant red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated earnings expectations. ⚠ The franchisor's history of bankruptcy introduces substantial financial risk and raises concerns about corporate stability and support. Without any outlet growth data, this opportunity appears speculative and carries elevated risk for investors.

Mason's Lobster Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk profile due to a complete lack of operational data, with N/A listed for total outlets, fees, and investment costs. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential ROI, while the unknown growth trajectory suggests the concept may still be in a conceptual or pre-launch phase. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution as there is currently no evidence of an established system or unit-level economics.

Red's Savoy Pizza presents a moderate entry point with a $40,000 franchise fee and a total investment range of $78,300 to $508,250, supported by a 5.0% royalty. ✓ The brand provides an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering transparency on potential performance. ⚠ However, the presence of litigation is a notable red flag that warrants due diligence. The lack of data on total outlets and recent openings or closures makes it difficult to assess the brand's current scale and growth trajectory.

Dog Haus presents a high-risk, high-reward opportunity with a massive investment range of $99,412 to $1,340,300, suggesting significant variability in build-out costs. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings indicates a clean legal history, which is a positive signal for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the lack of any outlet growth data (openings, closings, or total units) is a critical red flag, making it impossible to assess the brand's actual scale or franchisee success rate. The $40,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty are standard, but the opaque operational history demands extreme caution before investing.

Franknfurters Franchising, LLC operates as an area developer model with no disclosed outlet count, making it impossible to assess scale or growth trajectory. The total investment range of $342,150 to $815,300 is substantial, yet the absence of Item 19 financial performance data ⚠ prevents any evaluation of potential returns or profitability. While there are no litigation or bankruptcy red flags ✓, the lack of any outlet openings or closures over the past year suggests the franchise may be in a very early or inactive stage. This combination of high investment costs and zero financial transparency ⚠ presents significant risk for prospective area developers.

SmartBooks presents a low-cost entry point with a total investment range of $58,000 to $78,500 and a $50,000 franchise fee, though the 8.0% royalty is relatively high for such a modest investment. ✓ The franchise provides Item 19 financial disclosure, offering transparency on potential performance, and has no litigation or bankruptcy history. ⚠ However, the absence of any outlet data—including total units, openings, or closures—is a critical red flag, making it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or franchisee turnover. This lack of operational history suggests a very early-stage or unproven system, requiring extensive due diligence.

Icryo Franchise Systems presents a high-cost opportunity with a total investment range of $474,500 to $1,205,000 and a franchise fee of $29,250, coupled with a 6.5% royalty. ✓ The presence of Item 19 financial disclosure offers some transparency for prospective franchisees to evaluate performance. ⚠ However, the existence of litigation is a notable red flag that warrants careful due diligence. The lack of data on total outlets and recent openings or closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale or growth trajectory.

Stalk & Spade enters the market with a high entry barrier, requiring a total investment of $783,650 to $1,328,150 and a $54,900 franchise fee, positioning it as a significant capital commitment. ✓ The brand provides Item 19 financial disclosure, offering transparency on potential performance, and carries no litigation or bankruptcy history. ⚠ However, with no reported outlets opened or closed in the last year, the franchise lacks a proven growth trajectory or operational track record, making it a speculative investment. This absence of scale data suggests a nascent or pre-revenue system, demanding cautious due diligence from prospective franchisees.

Ducklings Early Learning Center presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment ranging from $993,400 to $2,153,500 and a $55,000 franchise fee, paired with a 6.0% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy history suggests a clean legal and financial background, and the inclusion of Item 19 financial disclosure provides transparency for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the lack of data on total outlets, recent openings, or closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's growth trajectory or operational stability. This franchise may appeal to investors with significant capital, but the unknown scale and performance history introduce considerable uncertainty.

Neighborhood Barre enters the market with a relatively low total investment range of $78,100 to $246,000 and a moderate franchise fee of $35,000, making it accessible for boutique fitness operators. ⚠ A significant red flag is the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated revenue or profitability benchmarks. ✓ The brand carries no litigation or bankruptcy history, which is a positive indicator of corporate stability. However, with no disclosed outlet counts or growth trajectory, this opportunity presents substantial uncertainty regarding its operational track record and market acceptance.

Sticky Fingers Cooking enters the market as a very small, unproven concept with no disclosed outlet counts, growth data, or financial performance in Item 19, making it impossible to assess its operational viability or franchisee success rates. ✓ The total investment range of $77,528 to $125,379 is relatively low, which lowers the financial barrier to entry for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the complete absence of any Item 19 financial disclosure, combined with zero information on openings or closures, represents a significant red flag and suggests the brand may be pre-revenue or in an extremely early development stage. Without any track record or financial benchmarks, this opportunity carries exceptionally high uncertainty and risk.

Jbr Franchise Co presents a high-risk profile due to a disclosed bankruptcy, which is a significant red flag for potential franchisees. The total investment range of $497,558 to $813,790 is substantial, yet the franchise lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, making it impossible to verify any revenue or profitability expectations. ⚠ The absence of any outlet data, combined with no royalty or growth figures, suggests a very early-stage or troubled system with no proven track record. ✓ The lack of litigation is a minor positive, but it is heavily outweighed by the bankruptcy and complete lack of operational transparency.

AutismCOE Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk profile due to the absence of any operational history, with no outlets opened or closed and no Item 19 financial disclosure to validate performance. The total investment range of $220,250 to $499,000 is substantial for a concept with zero proven unit economics. ⚠ The lack of a stated royalty rate and the relatively low franchise fee of $26,250 suggest the business model may still be in development. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of scale and financial data makes this an unproven venture.

OVO Salons Franchise, LLC presents a high-cost entry point with a $69,000 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $398,482 to $638,702, coupled with a 6.0% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history suggests a clean legal and financial background, and the presence of Item 19 provides some financial transparency for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the lack of any data on total outlets, openings, or closures creates a significant information gap, making it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or unit-level stability. This absence of operational history is a major red flag, as it prevents any meaningful evaluation of the franchise's market traction or failure rate.

This franchise presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete lack of transparency regarding financial performance, unit counts, and investment costs. The absence of an Item 19 earnings claim and specific outlet data ⚠ makes it impossible to verify the brand's scale or historical growth trajectory. While the lack of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive sign ✓, prospective buyers are essentially investing blind without access to standardized performance metrics or fee structures.

Closet Factory operates in the custom closet and home organization space with a relatively high entry cost, requiring a total investment between $392,500 and $663,500 and a $58,500 franchise fee. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating unit-level financial performance or validating the brand's profitability. ⚠ Without any data on outlet openings or closures, it is impossible to assess the system's growth trajectory or franchisee turnover, making this a high-risk opportunity due to the opaque financial picture.

Super Magnificent Coffee Company Ireland Limited presents a significant risk profile due to a complete lack of operational data, as no total outlets, franchise fee, royalty, or total investment figures are disclosed. The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a major ⚠ red flag, preventing any assessment of unit economics or profitability. With no information on outlet openings or closures, there is zero visibility into the franchise's growth trajectory or system stability. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a ✓ positive, the total lack of financial and operational transparency makes this opportunity impossible to evaluate.

Wingstop presents a low barrier to entry with a competitive $25,000 franchise fee ✓ and a clean historical record regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ and missing data regarding unit counts, royalties, and total investment ⚠ make it impossible to verify the brand's scale or profitability. Prospective franchisees should proceed with extreme caution and demand current, audited performance data before committing capital.

Red Mango FC, LLC presents a high-risk profile due to the absence of Item 19 financial performance data and the presence of litigation, which prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or growth trajectory. The total investment range of $106,500 to $556,500 is broad, suggesting significant variability in build-out costs, while the $15,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty are moderate. ⚠ The lack of any disclosed outlet counts or year-over-year changes makes it impossible to evaluate the brand's scale or recent expansion trends. ⚠ Without financial disclosures or a clear track record, this opportunity carries substantial uncertainty for prospective franchisees.