Companies
Column Legend (click to collapse)
Growth = (opened-closed)/total (20%+ hot, -10% shrinking)
AUV = Avg Unit Volume
%Achv = % achieving average
T = Terminations
NR = Non-Renewals
CO = Ceased Operations
Fail% = Failure rate (T+NR+CO)/total
Risk = Score 0-100 (0-29 low/30-59 med/60+ high)
19 = Has Item 19
L = Litigation
B = Bankruptcy
Tip: Select checkboxes to compare up to 6 franchises side-by-side
| Name | Industry | Files | Fee | Royalty | Investment | Outlets ▼ | Growth | AUV | Median | %Achv | T/NR/CO | Fail% | Risk | GM/EB | Flags | Updated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | Business Services | 32 |
$0K–$1K
|
— | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
PBC, LLC presents an unusually low barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $6,085 to $12,950 and no franchise fee ✓. The lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation, however, prevents an objective assessment of potential profitability ⚠. Additionally, the disclosure of active litigation introduces legal risk, while the absence of scale or outlet count data suggests the system may lack operational maturity ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| P | Home Services | 35 |
$0K–$50K
|
7.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$94K–$351K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Poolwerx Franchise presents a mid-range investment opportunity of $94,400 to $350,500 within the pool maintenance sector, incentivizing new partners with a $0 franchise fee. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history indicates a clean legal standing, though the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure makes it difficult for prospective buyers to benchmark potential earnings. ⚠ Critical data regarding total outlet count and unit growth is unavailable, preventing a clear assessment of the brand's current scale and market trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Q | Food & Beverage | 41 |
$40K
|
5.0%
+4.5%ad
|
$546K–$1.3M
|
— |
|
— | $1.5M | 43% | — | — | 20 |
15%eb
|
19 L | 2 months | ||
|
Qdoba presents a scalable fast-casual opportunity supported by a transparent financial performance representation, though the lack of available outlet data makes recent growth trends difficult to assess. ✓ The franchise offers a competitive 5.0% royalty fee, but prospective franchisees must prepare for a substantial total investment ranging from $545,500 to over $1.2 million. ⚠ Investors should exercise caution and conduct specific due diligence regarding the disclosed litigation history before committing capital.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| O | Child Services | 8 |
$45K
|
9.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$180K–$568K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
One River School presents a high-entry investment model ranging from $179,500 to $568,100, paired with a steep 9.0% royalty rate that demands strong unit-level margins. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a critical red flag, preventing the verification of ROI or profitability benchmarks. ⚠ A complete lack of scale and growth data (N/A for outlets) suggests the system may be unproven or in a very early stage of development.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Cleaning & Restoration | 62 |
$33K
|
4.0%
+0.5%ad
|
$104K–$180K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
ServiceMaster Clean/Restore SPE LLC presents a low-risk profile with a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, though the absence of an Item 19 prevents verification of financial performance. ✓ The franchise offers a competitive 4.0% royalty rate and a mid-range total investment of $104,300 to $179,750, making it accessible relative to the capital intensity of the restoration industry. ⚠ However, the lack of data regarding total outlets, openings, and closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's current scale or growth trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Business Services | 25 |
$4K–$50K
|
8.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$372K–$492K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
Smash Franchise Partners, LLC presents a high-cost investment opportunity requiring a total spend between $372,050 and $492,200. ⚠ Significant risks are present due to the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation, the absence of scale or growth data, and a disclosure of active litigation. ⚠ The franchise further burdens operators with a high 8.0% royalty fee, diminishing potential returns in the absence of proven system-wide stability.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| W |
+1
Winzer
|
Business Services | 24 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | |
|
Winzer Franchise Company Inc. offers a highly accessible entry point for entrepreneurs, characterized by a low total investment ranging from $5,950 to $16,153. ✓ The opportunity presents a clean background with no disclosed history of litigation or bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an assessment of potential earnings, and the absence of outlet count data suggests limited scale or transparency regarding system-wide growth.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| W | Food & Beverage | 17 | — |
5.0%
|
— | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
World of Sourdough Franchising, LLC presents a highly opaque profile defined almost entirely by missing data, rendering a comprehensive risk assessment impossible. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, combined with unknown unit counts and investment costs, indicates a lack of operational maturity and transparency. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face significant risk investing in a system with no verifiable track record of unit openings or financial performance.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| T | Food & Beverage | 7 |
$40K
|
— |
$384K–$667K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
This franchise requires a substantial initial investment of $383,500 to $667,000 with a $40,000 fee, yet lacks Item 19 financial performance disclosures to validate the unit economics. The absence of outlet data and current scale metrics makes it impossible to verify the brand's growth trajectory or system stability. Potential franchisees should approach with extreme caution due to the presence of litigation and the lack of transparency regarding historical unit performance.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| W | Business Services | 16 |
$44K–$55K
|
— |
$89K–$93K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
World Options, Inc. presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment of roughly $90k, though the $44,000 franchise fee consumes a significant portion of that initial capital. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy history offers basic credibility, but the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure makes it impossible to verify potential ROI. ⚠ Most critically, the lack of scale (N/A outlets) and missing growth data suggest this is an unproven or opaque system with high relative risk. ⚠
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Food & Beverage | 49 |
$40K–$65K
|
— |
$2.3M–$6.4M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Brinker International Payroll Company, L.P. represents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity requiring a total investment between $2.2M and $6.3M, positioning it for deep-pocketed investors rather than typical franchisees. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback, as it prevents prospective buyers from validating the potential return on such a substantial capital outlay. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy history offers basic operational stability, though the missing data regarding outlet counts and royalty fees makes assessing the brand's scale and growth trajectory impossible.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Financial Services | 30 |
$2K–$7K
|
— |
$12K–$130K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
Ameriprise Financial Services LLC presents a moderate investment range of $12,099 to $130,363 with a highly accessible franchise fee of $1,500. ✓ The lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant transparency gap, and the disclosure of active litigation ⚠ requires careful due diligence. ⚠ The absence of outlet data makes it impossible to analyze the system's scale or recent growth trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| E | Other | 24 |
$45K–$50K
|
6.0%
+6.0%ad
|
$627K–$2.3M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
Escapology LLC presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $626,500 to over $2.2 million, positioning it as a significant capital commitment. ✓ The franchise offers a structured model with a standard 6.0% royalty fee, though the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure makes it difficult for prospective franchisees to benchmark potential returns. ⚠ Investors should proceed with caution due to the presence of active litigation and the absence of data regarding outlet counts or recent growth trajectory. ⚠
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$50K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$737K–$1.1M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Cabo Fresh presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity with a total cost ranging from roughly $736,000 to over $1 million. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, and the 6.0% royalty fee aligns with industry standards. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an objective assessment of potential returns, and the absence of outlet data makes it impossible to gauge the system's scale or growth trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Fitness & Wellness | 21 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
This franchise presents a critical transparency risk, as it fails to disclose essential data regarding unit count, fees, and total investment. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of economic viability or potential return on investment. ⚠ While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a technical positive ✓, the severe data void makes this opportunity impossible to analyze or recommend.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| G | Beauty & Personal Care | 8 |
$45K
|
6.5%
+3.0%ad
|
$757K–$1.5M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
GLO Tanning Franchise LLC presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity with total costs ranging from $757,200 to $1,478,167. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag for prospective investors seeking validated return data. ⚠ A lack of available unit count or growth statistics makes it impossible to gauge the brand's current scale or market trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| H | Pet Services | 17 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Happie Doggie, LLC presents a critical risk profile due to a complete lack of operational transparency, offering no data regarding units, fees, or total investment. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of profitability or economic viability. ⚠ With no growth trajectory or scale metrics available, this concept appears to be unproven and likely in a pre-sale or inactive franchising phase.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| J | Home Services | 19 | — | — |
$201K–$308K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Junkco+ International, LLC presents a high-risk opportunity due to the lack of Item 19 financial performance disclosures and N/A outlet data, which obscures the brand's operational history and unit economics. The total investment range of $200,760 to $307,760 represents a significant capital requirement for a concept with no proven track record. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive, the complete lack of transparency regarding fees and system size makes it impossible to verify growth trajectory or scalability.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 75 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
HANA GROUP FRANCHISING, LLC DBA MAI FRANCHISING, LLC presents a challenging analysis due to a complete lack of data regarding unit count, fees, and total investment. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any assessment of unit economics or potential return on investment. ⚠ While the lack of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive baseline indicator, the inability to track growth or outlet closures makes it impossible to determine the system's health or trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 13 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Teapulse Franchise Group LLC currently presents an unquantifiable risk profile due to a complete lack of operational and financial data, including scale, costs, and unit performance. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential return on investment, while missing outlet counts make it impossible to determine if the system is growing or contracting. ⚠ While the franchise has no record of litigation or bankruptcy, the data void suggests it is likely in a pre-sale or early launch phase with no operating history to analyze.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Beauty & Personal Care | 2 |
$41K–$43K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$212K–$530K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Beauty LAb Franchising presents a high-risk opportunity due to the lack of Item 19 financial performance disclosures and unavailable outlet data, which obscures the brand's operational history and stability. The investment range of $212,171 to $529,913 is substantial for a beauty concept, requiring significant capital without proven earnings to validate the cost. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive, the 6% royalty fee adds to the operational burden for a franchise that currently lacks a verifiable track record.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| R | Fitness & Wellness | 19 |
$50K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$373K–$579K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
Phoenix Franchising Group, LLC presents a high-barrier entry point with a total investment ranging from $373,496 to $578,796 and a standard 6.0% royalty fee. ⚠ Significant risk factors exist due to the presence of litigation and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving potential investors without validated earnings data. ⚠ The inability to track system health is further compounded by missing outlet counts and growth metrics, resulting in a complete lack of transparency regarding the brand's scale and trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| R | Food & Beverage | 9 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
This franchise presents a critical lack of transparency, failing to disclose fundamental data regarding unit count, fees, and total investment. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any meaningful assessment of potential profitability or economic viability. ⚠ With no available metrics on growth trajectory or scale, this opportunity currently poses significant analytical risks and lacks the necessary data to support a sound investment decision.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Pet Services | 27 |
$10K–$55K
|
8.0%
|
$24K–$121K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
Sit Means Sit Franchise, Inc. offers a highly accessible entry point into the pet services sector with a low franchise fee of $10,000 and a total investment starting at just $24,275 ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it difficult for prospective franchisees to validate potential returns or benchmark profitability ⚠. Additionally, the presence of litigation within the disclosure document serves as a cautionary signal regarding the system's stability and legal history ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 3 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Mutabak Karak Global Inc. presents a high-risk profile due to a complete lack of operational transparency, with critical data regarding franchise fees, royalties, and total investment listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential ROI, and the unknown scale of the network makes it impossible to assess market traction or stability. ⚠ Prospective investors should treat this opportunity with extreme caution, as the missing fundamentals suggest the concept may be unproven or the franchisor is unprepared for compliant system-wide growth.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| T | Home Services | 65 |
$30K–$50K
|
7.0%
+7.0%ad
|
$83K–$349K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Two Men and a Truck SPE LLC presents a moderate investment entry point of $83,210 to $349,275, though the 7.0% royalty fee is relatively high for the service sector. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, but the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents a clear assessment of unit profitability. ⚠ Critical data regarding total outlets and growth trajectory is missing, making it difficult to evaluate the system's scale or momentum. ⚠
|
||||||||||||||||||
| W | Food & Beverage | 30 | — | — |
$1.6M–$7.0M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Walk-On's Enterprises presents a high-barrier investment opportunity with a total cost ranging from $1.55M to over $7M, categorizing it as a premium, capital-intensive franchise. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback for prospective investors, as it prevents the verification of potential returns at this price point. ⚠ Critical data regarding outlet counts, fees, and recent unit growth is missing, making it impossible to assess the system's current scale or trajectory. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive indicator of corporate stability, though the overall risk profile remains elevated due to the high capital requirement and lack of financial transparency.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| D | Food & Beverage | 15 | — | — |
$618K–$3.2M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Dave's Hot Chicken Franchise Co. SPV LLC presents a high-barrier entry with a total investment range spanning from $617,800 to over $3.2 million, indicating significant capital requirements for real estate and build-out. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history suggests a clean operational and legal track record. ⚠ However, the lack of Item 19 financial performance representations and specific outlet data creates a high information asymmetry, making it impossible to verify unit-level economics or system-wide growth.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| P | Food & Beverage | 28 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Perkins LLC presents a severe data transparency issue, with critical metrics including total outlets, fees, and investment costs listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any assessment of unit economics or potential return on investment. ⚠ While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a technical positive ✓, the inability to verify scale or growth trajectory makes this opportunity impossible to analyze effectively.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| E | Cleaning & Restoration | 11 | — | — |
$116K–$131K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
| M | Business Services | 16 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
MMI BUSINESS BROKERS LLC appears to be a small or emerging opportunity with zero disclosed financial data, making it impossible to verify unit-level economics or total startup costs. The lack of an Item 19 earnings claim and missing investment figures is a significant red flag ⚠, preventing any assessment of potential ROI or operational risk. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive ✓, the complete lack of transparency regarding outlet counts and growth suggests this is likely a very early-stage or non-franchised business model rather than a scalable franchise system.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| I | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$100K
|
10.0%
|
$1.5M–$2.2M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
IT Italian Trattoria presents a high-barrier entry with a total investment ranging from $1.5M to $2.2M, requiring significant capital for a concept that currently lacks an established footprint or growth data. The 10% royalty fee is notably steep for an emerging brand, potentially straining cash flow during the critical startup phase. A major red flag is the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving prospective buyers without verified data to validate the business model. While the clean litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive, the high upfront cost combined with zero transparency on earnings makes this a highly speculative opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Retail | 16 |
$15K
|
— |
$240K–$2.3M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Sunoco Retail LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a $15,000 franchise fee ✓ and a clean background regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓. However, the total investment range of $239,850 to $2,270,400 is substantial ⚠, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an assessment of potential profitability ⚠. Additionally, the lack of data regarding outlet counts and recent growth activity makes it difficult to gauge the system's current scale or trajectory ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| D | Food & Beverage | 17 |
$10K–$30K
|
4.5%
+3.0%ad
|
$255K–$3.1M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 50 | — | L B | 2 months | ||
|
DFO, LLC presents a highly unusual risk profile due to the combination of a minimal $10,000 franchise fee and a massive total investment range reaching over $3 million. ⚠ The disclosure is heavily marred by historical litigation and bankruptcy filings, and the lack of an Item 19 prevents any validation of potential returns. ⚠ With no available data regarding outlet counts or recent unit growth, the franchise lacks the scale and transparency typically required for a secure investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 32 |
$1K–$25K
|
— |
$287K–$807K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
Marco's Franchising presents a high-barrier entry point with a total investment ranging from $286,727 to $807,152, though this is slightly offset by an unusually low $1,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback, preventing prospective investors from validating the potential return on such a substantial capital outlay. ⚠ Additionally, the disclosure of active litigation introduces risk, while the lack of outlet growth data obscures the brand's current trajectory and stability.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Home Services | 21 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Mosquito Squad Franchising SPE LLC presents a ⚠ high-risk profile due to a complete lack of operational transparency, with critical data regarding scale, fees, and investment costs listed as N/A. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential ROI, making it impossible to conduct a standard financial analysis. While the franchise shows ✓ no history of litigation or bankruptcy, the severe data voids suggest the opportunity may be unviable or improperly vetted for prospective investors.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| N | Child Services | 17 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
This franchise presents a concept centered on parental education, but the total lack of performance data makes it impossible to evaluate its scale or financial viability. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 disclosure, combined with missing data for fees, outlet counts, and investment costs, suggests the brand is likely in a very early stage of development. ⚠ Prospective buyers face extreme risk due to zero transparency regarding unit economics or operational track record.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Fitness & Wellness | 15 |
$50K
|
— |
$118K–$253K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
StretchMed Franchise, LLC presents a moderate initial investment range of $118k to $253k ✓ with a clean leadership history regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓. However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ and missing data regarding outlet counts and royalty rates ⚠ make it impossible to gauge system scale or unit economics. Prospective franchisees face significant risk investing in a concept with no transparent track record of performance or growth trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| U | Beauty & Personal Care | 27 | — | — |
$330K–$584K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Uni K Wax Franchising presents a high-barrier entry point with a total investment ranging from $329,985 to $583,925, positioning it as a capital-intensive venture in the beauty sector. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant transparency risk, preventing prospective franchisees from validating potential earnings or ROI. ⚠ Critical data regarding unit count, royalty fees, and recent growth trajectory is unavailable, making it impossible to assess the system's health or momentum. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy history offers a clean legal baseline, but the severe data limitations suggest potential investors should proceed with extreme caution.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| O | Hospitality | 3 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
This franchise presents a critical lack of transparency, with all key metrics including scale, fees, and total investment listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential ROI or profitability. ⚠ With no data regarding outlets opened or closed last year, the brand’s growth trajectory and operational stability cannot be analyzed.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Food & Beverage | 7 |
$30K
|
— |
$160K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Baja Smoothies Franchise, LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a reasonable $29,900 franchise fee ✓ and a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ and the lack of data regarding outlet count or royalty rates make it impossible to gauge system scale or unit economics. The reported total investment range is notably erratic, spanning from roughly $160,000 to over $361 million, which signals significant inconsistencies in the financial data ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Food & Beverage | 6 |
$45K–$47K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$1.5M–$6.1M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
AMG Franchises LLC presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $1.5M to $6.1M, placing it firmly in the capital-intensive category. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag for prospective investors evaluating return potential. ⚠ Critical data regarding unit count and recent growth trajectories is missing, making it impossible to assess the system's scale or market traction. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy history offers basic operational stability, but the high franchise fee and lack of transparency warrant extreme caution.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| R | Business Services | 13 | — | — |
$131K–$352K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Redline Gear Cleaning presents a high-risk, early-stage investment opportunity given the lack of disclosed system size, unit growth data, and Item 19 financial performance representations. The total investment range of $131,000 to $352,000 is substantial for a concept without a proven track record or transparent earnings history. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive baseline, the complete lack of operational transparency suggests this is likely a pre-sale or very young franchise system. ⚠ Potential franchisees should approach with extreme caution due to the inability to verify unit-level economics or brand stability.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| R | Health & Medical | 3 |
$25K
|
7.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$44K–$70K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Rapha X, LLC presents an accessible entry point for entrepreneurs with a low total investment of $44k-$70k and a standard $25k franchise fee ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating the business's profitability or economic viability ⚠. Additionally, the total lack of scale and missing outlet data suggest this is likely an unproven, early-stage concept with significant performance ambiguity ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Business Services | 29 |
$35K–$148K
|
20.0%
|
$53K–$273K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
BNI Franchising, LLC presents a high-cost entry barrier with a total investment reaching up to $273,145 and a steep 20.0% royalty fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback, preventing prospective franchisees from verifying potential earnings. ⚠ The disclosure of active litigation introduces additional risk, while the lack of data regarding outlet counts makes it impossible to gauge the system's scale or recent growth trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Hospitality | 39 |
$0K–$45K
|
— |
$100K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Cobblestone Hotels offers a highly variable investment range from roughly $100k to over $15.4 million, suggesting a complex, asset-heavy model rather than a standardized franchise unit. The absence of Item 19 financial performance representations is a significant red flag, preventing due diligence on potential returns. While the company reports no active litigation or bankruptcy, the lack of transparency regarding outlet growth and unit economics makes this a high-risk opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$30K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$271K–$568K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Skinnypizza Franchise Systems presents a high-barrier entry point with a total investment ranging from $270,500 to $568,000, which constitutes a significant capital commitment for an unproven concept. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history offers basic operational reassurance, but the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents a data-driven assessment of potential ROI. ⚠ Critical risks regarding scale and viability persist due to missing data on outlet counts and recent unit growth, leaving prospective franchisees with no tangible evidence of market traction or system stability. ⚠
|
||||||||||||||||||
| D | Beauty & Personal Care | 16 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
DaVi Nails Salon and Spa, LLC presents a high-risk profile due to a complete lack of operational transparency and verifiable scale. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, combined with missing data on costs, fees, and unit counts, makes it impossible to conduct a standard ROI analysis or assess the franchise's financial health. ⚠ Without clear metrics on recent growth or total outlets, prospective franchisees lack the necessary benchmarks to evaluate the system's stability or market traction.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| F | Senior Care | 8 |
$35K
|
4.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$55K–$119K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Family Nest Franchise, LLC presents a low-cost entry opportunity with a total investment range of $55,005 to $118,600 and a reasonable 4% royalty fee. However, the absence of Item 19 financial performance representations is a significant red flag, making it impossible to verify unit-level economics. With no disclosed data on outlet growth or closures, the brand's operational stability and market traction remain unproven.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| G | Food & Beverage | 34 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Graze Craze Franchising, LLC presents a clean background with no history of bankruptcy or litigation ✓, but the total lack of operational data makes it impossible to gauge scale or momentum ⚠. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant drawback for prospective investors seeking quantifiable returns ⚠. With all key metrics—including fees, investment costs, and outlet counts—listed as N/A, this opportunity currently lacks the transparency required for a thorough risk assessment ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||