Companies

Code Ninjas LLC operates in the competitive children's coding education space with a moderate initial investment range of $174,750 to $298,250 and a franchise fee of $30,000. ⚠ A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which raises concerns about operational or franchisee relations. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data makes it impossible to assess unit-level profitability or validate the business model. ✓ The 8% royalty is standard for the industry, but without growth or closure data, the franchise's trajectory remains opaque.

Oromo Cafe presents a relatively low-cost entry point in the franchise space, with a $35,000 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $203,750 to $384,500. ⚠ A significant red flag is the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated revenue or profitability benchmarks. ✓ The brand carries no litigation or bankruptcy history, which is a positive indicator of corporate stability. However, with no disclosed outlet counts or growth data, the franchise lacks the transparency needed to assess its operational scale or expansion trajectory.

B-Land Beauty enters the market with a moderate initial investment of $318,761 to $549,263 and a $25,500 franchise fee, but the absence of any Item 19 financial disclosure is a critical ⚠ red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. The lack of reported outlet counts, including no data on openings or closures, makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale or growth trajectory. While the 5.0% royalty is standard and there are no litigation or bankruptcy concerns, the complete opacity around financial performance and operational history presents a high-risk profile for investors.

This franchise presents a critical transparency risk, as key data points regarding scale, fees, and total investment are listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further prevents any meaningful assessment of unit economics or potential return on investment. ✓ While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive indicator of legal stability, the overall data vacuum makes this a high-risk proposition for due diligence.

Travelodge presents an exceptionally wide total investment range of $226,942 to nearly $11 million, indicating significant variability in property type and scale. A major red flag is the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated earnings expectations. ⚠ The lack of any outlet growth or closure data further obscures the brand's operational health and trajectory. Without financial disclosures or unit-level performance history, this opportunity carries substantial uncertainty for investors.

Happier at Home presents a high-risk opportunity due to its lack of any operational history, with zero outlets opened or closed, and no Item 19 financial performance data available for validation. The total investment range of $97,575 to $139,875 is moderate, but the $55,000 franchise fee is notably high for a concept with no proven track record. ⚠ The absence of any royalty fee structure is unusual and may indicate an unrefined business model. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral positive, but the complete absence of scale and growth data makes this an unverifiable and speculative investment.

Boba Nation Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated data on revenue or profitability. The total investment range of $350,000 to $495,000 is substantial for a concept with no disclosed operating history or outlet growth, as the FDD reports zero outlets opened or closed. ⚠ The lack of any operational scale or track record makes it impossible to assess unit-level economics or brand viability. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a neutral positive, but it does little to offset the fundamental risk of investing in a franchise with no proven performance data.

Kaylena Marie's Bakery presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of any Item 19 financial performance data, leaving potential franchisees without validated revenue or profit expectations. The total investment range of $376,200 to $825,100 is substantial for a bakery concept, yet the franchise lacks any disclosed outlet count or growth history, making it impossible to assess scale or traction. ⚠ The lack of any opened or closed outlets in the last year suggests this is either a very new or stagnant franchise system. Without financial disclosures or operational track record, this opportunity carries significant uncertainty despite the absence of litigation or bankruptcy.

Valera Global, Inc. presents a low barrier to entry with a competitive $20,000 franchise fee and a total investment range of $111,975 to $188,475 ✓. The brand lacks a proven scale or growth trajectory, as outlet counts and recent unit activity are not disclosed ⚠. Additionally, the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it impossible to validate potential returns or profitability ⚠.

Taziki's Franchising LLC presents a significant investment opportunity with a total cost ranging from $555,000 to over $1 million, coupled with a $35,000 franchise fee and a 4.0% royalty. ⚠ A major red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial disclosure, making it impossible to verify unit-level performance or profitability. ✓ The franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, which is a positive indicator of corporate stability. However, without data on outlet growth or closures, the brand's current scale and trajectory remain unclear, demanding cautious due diligence from prospective investors.

Mensho presents a high-risk, high-cost opportunity with a total investment range of $560,295 to $2,362,410, placing it in the premium tier for a restaurant concept. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating any historical unit-level performance or profitability. ✓ The brand carries no litigation or bankruptcy history, but with no data on outlet growth or closures, there is no evidence of a proven expansion trajectory. Ultimately, this franchise requires substantial capital commitment with no financial transparency, making due diligence extremely challenging.

Baymont Inn & Suites presents a high-risk investment opportunity due to the absence of an Item 19 financial performance disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without validated earnings data. The franchise requires a substantial total investment ranging from $224,948 to over $10.5 million, paired with a $33,950 franchise fee, yet lacks transparency on royalty fees and outlet growth. ⚠ The lack of reported openings or closures in the last year suggests stagnant or undisclosed unit performance, raising concerns about brand momentum. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings provides a minor positive, but the overall lack of operational and financial data makes this a speculative venture.

Exectransport, Inc. presents an exceptionally low barrier to entry with a total investment starting at $49,487 and no initial franchise fee ✓. However, the financial model is aggressive and highly unusual, requiring a 31.0% royalty rate that will severely constrain unit profitability ⚠. The franchise also lacks transparency regarding system size, recent growth, and unit-level economics, as it does not provide an Item 19 financial performance representation ⚠.

Howard Johnson presents a significant investment risk due to its extraordinarily wide total investment range of $347,215 to $11,539,776, which suggests a highly variable business model with no clear standard unit. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data means prospective franchisees cannot evaluate potential earnings or profitability, a major red flag for any investment. ⚠ The presence of litigation further compounds the risk profile, while the lack of disclosed outlet counts for openings or closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's current scale or growth trajectory. This franchise offers no verifiable data on system size, financial performance, or recent expansion, making it an exceptionally opaque and high-risk opportunity.

Nan Xiang Express Franchisor LLC presents a franchise opportunity with no publicly available financial performance representation (Item 19), which is a significant ⚠ risk for prospective franchisees evaluating potential earnings. The absence of disclosed outlet counts, franchise fees, total investment, and growth data makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, cost structure, or historical expansion trajectory. While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy filings is a ✓ positive indicator of legal stability, the complete lack of operational and financial transparency suggests this is either a very new or minimally developed franchise system. Investors should proceed with extreme caution and demand full disclosure before considering this opportunity.

Tremble enters the market with a substantial franchise fee of $50,000 and a 7.0% royalty, requiring a total investment between $245,630 and $506,230. The absence of any outlet data, including total units, openings, and closures, is a significant ⚠ red flag, as it prevents any assessment of brand traction or operational stability. While the presence of Item 19 financial disclosure is a ✓ positive for transparency, the complete lack of scale and growth history makes this an exceptionally high-risk, unproven opportunity. Prospective franchisees should demand detailed operational history and validation before proceeding.

Ramada requires a substantial total investment ranging from $7.7 million to $23.1 million, positioning it as a high-cost hospitality opportunity. ⚠ A significant red flag is the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated earnings expectations. ✓ The brand reports no litigation or bankruptcy history, which provides some baseline stability. However, the lack of disclosed outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to assess the system's current health or expansion trajectory.

Optimum Car presents an exceptionally low barrier to entry with a $5,000 franchise fee and a total investment starting around $30k ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents prospective franchisees from validating the business's earning potential ⚠. The lack of scale data and performance metrics makes this a high-risk opportunity requiring significant due diligence regarding its operational viability ⚠.

Hybrid Limo Express, Inc. presents a low-cost entry point into the transportation sector with a total investment ranging from $34,606 to $116,156 and no franchise fee ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it impossible to verify potential returns ⚠. Additionally, the lack of data regarding total outlets or recent unit growth suggests this is likely a young or unproven concept with limited scale ⚠.

Marathon Petroleum Company Lp operates as a major downstream energy franchise with no publicly available Item 19 financial performance data, making it impossible to assess unit-level economics or profitability. ⚠ The absence of any outlet count, franchise fee, royalty rate, or total investment figures creates a complete lack of transparency for prospective franchisees. ✓ The company reports no litigation or bankruptcy history, indicating a clean legal and financial record. However, without any growth or closure data, the franchise's expansion trajectory and operational stability remain entirely opaque.

Water Wings Swim School requires a substantial total investment of $994,400 to $1,424,550, paired with a high franchise fee of $119,400 and a 6.0% royalty. ✓ The presence of Item 19 financial disclosure offers some transparency for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the franchise carries a significant red flag with active litigation, and the lack of reported outlet data for openings and closures makes it impossible to assess growth trajectory or operational stability. This combination of high capital requirements and unresolved legal risks warrants cautious due diligence.

First Class of New York, Inc. presents a low barrier to entry with a franchise fee of only $5,000 and a total investment ranging from $29,106 to $80,656. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean record with no history of litigation or bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure and missing data regarding outlet counts and royalties make it impossible to assess the system's scale, growth trajectory, or unit-level profitability.

Excelsior Car presents a low-cost entry point into the automotive sector with a total investment ranging from $25k to $137k and no initial franchise fee. ✓ The absence of royalty payments and the clean legal record are distinct advantages for operators seeking high margins. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure makes it impossible to verify potential returns, and the missing scale data suggests a limited or unproven operational history. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should proceed with caution as the total investment variance is significant without validated performance metrics.

Cwe America presents an unassessable market position due to a complete lack of operational transparency, with all key metrics including scale, fees, and investment costs listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential return on investment. ⚠ With no data regarding outlet openings or closures, prospective franchisees cannot evaluate the system's growth trajectory or stability.

Elite Limousine Plus, Inc. presents a low-cost entry point into the transportation sector with a total investment of $38,885 to $150,350 and no franchise fee. ⚠ The opportunity is heavily compromised by significant red flags, including a history of both litigation and bankruptcy for the company or its executives. The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation further obscures the potential return on investment for prospective franchisees. Additionally, the lack of scale and missing outlet data suggest a lack of operational maturity and system stability.

PF Franchising, Inc. presents a significant risk profile due to the complete absence of financial performance representations (Item 19), leaving prospective franchisees without any data on potential earnings or outlet profitability. The total investment range of $256,750 to $337,250 is substantial, yet there is no disclosed information on royalty fees or the total number of operating units, making it impossible to assess the brand's market penetration or ongoing costs. ⚠ The lack of any outlet opening or closing data over the past year further obscures the system's growth trajectory and stability. Without litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary red flag is the total lack of financial transparency, which demands extreme caution and extensive independent validation before any commitment.

SEAL KING INC presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated data on unit-level revenue or profitability. The total investment range of $58,050 to $107,900 is relatively low, but the 7.0% royalty fee is notable for a brand with no disclosed outlet count or growth history. ⚠ The lack of any operational track record, combined with zero information on openings or closures, makes it impossible to assess the franchise's stability or market acceptance. Without financial performance data or a proven system, this franchise should be approached with extreme caution and only after extensive independent validation.

Allstate Private Car presents a low-cost entry point into the insurance sector with a total investment ranging from roughly $55k to $117k. ✓ The franchise benefits from strong brand recognition and a scalable service model. ⚠ However, prospective investors face significant transparency issues, as the FDD lacks an Item 19 financial performance representation and discloses a history of litigation. ⚠ The absence of outlet data and royalty information further complicates the ability to benchmark operational performance.

GreenTree Hospitality Group, Inc. offers a relatively accessible entry point with a $20,000 franchise fee and a total investment range of $300,500 to $1,815,900, supported by a moderate 4.0% royalty. ✓ The franchise provides Item 19 financial performance data, which is a positive for prospective franchisees seeking transparency. ⚠ However, the absence of reported outlet counts for openings, closures, or total system size makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale or growth trajectory. ✓ The clean legal record with no litigation or bankruptcy history is a favorable indicator of corporate stability.

Annex Brands presents a moderate entry point with a franchise fee of $35,000 and total investment ranging from $106,580 to $191,130, though the absence of outlet data makes it impossible to assess its scale or growth trajectory. ✓ The brand provides Item 19 financial disclosure, offering some transparency on potential performance. ⚠ A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which introduces legal and reputational risk for prospective franchisees. The 6.0% royalty fee is standard, but the lack of information on outlet openings and closures prevents any evaluation of system stability or churn.

Retrofitness, LLC presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment ranging from $2.0M to $3.2M and a $29,000 franchise fee, yet it lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, making it impossible to assess unit-level profitability or revenue potential. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history suggests a clean legal and financial record. ⚠ However, the lack of outlet growth data and the failure to provide any financial performance representation are significant red flags, as prospective franchisees cannot evaluate the brand's operational success or failure rates. This combination of high capital requirements and opaque financials makes Retrofitness a high-risk investment that demands extensive independent validation.

Giovanni's Franchise Services Inc. presents a low-cost entry point with a $15,000 franchise fee and a minimal 1.0% royalty, which is highly favorable for franchisee margins. The total investment range of $121,150 to $256,250 is accessible, and the absence of litigation or bankruptcy history suggests a clean operational record. ✓ The presence of Item 19 financial disclosure provides transparency for prospective investors. ⚠ However, the lack of any outlet data—including total units, openings, or closures—makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or franchisee turnover, representing a significant information gap.

375 Chicken ‘n Fries presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of any operational history or financial performance data in its FDD. The total investment range of $324,100 to $521,500 is substantial for a new concept, yet there is no Item 19 to validate potential earnings. ⚠ The lack of any disclosed outlet openings or closures suggests the brand may be pre-revenue or extremely limited in scale. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a neutral positive, but the high franchise fee of $40,000 and 6% royalty without proven unit economics makes this a speculative venture.

Eiffel Waffle presents a moderate-cost entry point with a franchise fee of $40,000 and total investment ranging from $264,910 to $387,676, coupled with a 6.0% royalty. ✓ The franchise provides Item 19 financial disclosure, offering transparency on potential performance, and has no litigation or bankruptcy history. ⚠ However, the absence of any outlet count or growth data (total outlets, openings, or closures) makes it impossible to assess its operational scale or franchisee turnover, raising significant concerns about the brand's maturity and stability. This lack of track record suggests a very early-stage or unproven system, which carries high execution risk for prospective franchisees.

Maid Brigade operates with a moderate franchise fee of $40,700 and a total investment range of $120,300 to $136,366, positioning it as a mid-tier entry in the residential cleaning sector. ⚠ A significant red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without validated revenue or profitability data to assess performance. ⚠ The presence of litigation further elevates risk, while the lack of reported outlet growth or closures makes it impossible to gauge the system's expansion or retention trends. This franchise demands cautious due diligence given the opaque financial picture and legal concerns.

Hickory River Smokehouse presents a moderate entry point with a $30,000 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $315,000 to $1,084,500, though the absence of outlet data (total, opened, or closed) is a significant ⚠ transparency concern. The 5% royalty is standard, and the lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a ✓ positive signal. However, without any disclosed growth or closure figures, assessing the brand's operational health or market traction is impossible. Prospective franchisees should demand Item 19 financial performance data and recent outlet counts before proceeding.

How To Manage A Small Law Firm presents a niche consulting opportunity with a moderate initial investment ranging from $82,850 to $121,400 and a $45,000 franchise fee. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal history, which is a positive signal for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed outlet counts, royalty fees, and any year-over-year growth data makes it impossible to assess the brand's operational scale or financial viability. This absence of key performance metrics represents a significant information gap for evaluating the franchise's market traction and potential return on investment.

Zen Massage Center presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without validated revenue or profitability data. The total investment range of $300,540 to $367,522 is substantial for a service-based concept, yet there is no operational history or outlet count to assess brand traction or unit-level performance. ⚠ The lack of any disclosed outlets opened or closed, combined with no litigation or bankruptcy, creates a vacuum of information that makes it impossible to evaluate growth trajectory or franchisee success. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of financial performance data and scale is a significant red flag for investors.

Avalon presents a low-cost entry point with a franchise fee of just $2,000 and a total investment range of $27,648 to $75,813, making it accessible for budget-conscious investors. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of Item 19 financial performance data, combined with no disclosed outlet counts or growth trajectory, creates significant uncertainty around revenue potential and brand viability. This franchise operates as a high-risk venture due to the complete absence of transparency on unit economics and system scale.

Hi-5 ABA presents a high-risk profile due to confirmed litigation and the absence of any financial performance representation (Item 19), leaving potential franchisees without validated revenue or profitability data. The lack of disclosed outlet counts, franchise fees, and total investment further obscures the brand's operational scale and capital requirements. Without historical growth data or a clear financial framework, assessing the franchise's viability or market traction is impossible. ⚠ The combination of litigation and missing financial disclosures makes this a speculative opportunity requiring extensive independent due diligence.

MDSA, LLC presents a mid-range investment opportunity requiring $247,500 to $595,609, supported by a standard 5.0% royalty fee and a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ✓ The inclusion of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a key advantage for potential investor analysis. ⚠ However, the lack of reported outlet counts or growth metrics makes it difficult to assess the franchise's scale and market traction.

Accurate Leak and Line presents a high-cost entry point with a franchise fee of $54,900 and a total investment range of $133,700 to $285,150, coupled with a 7.0% royalty. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating any historical revenue or profitability data. ⚠ With no data on total outlets, openings, or closures, the brand's scale and growth trajectory remain entirely opaque, making it impossible to assess market traction or stability. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history offers a minor positive, but the overall lack of transparency and high upfront costs create substantial risk for potential investors.

Sheenco Travel Franchise offers a low-cost entry point with a $20,000 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $32,450 to $50,710, paired with a minimal 1.0% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed outlet counts for openings, closures, or total system size makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or franchisee turnover. Without this operational data, the opportunity carries significant uncertainty regarding market validation and unit-level performance.

Muginoho International, Inc. presents a high-risk profile due to the complete absence of any operational history or financial performance data, as no outlets are listed and Item 19 is not disclosed. The total investment range of $163,500 to $477,000 is substantial for a concept with zero proven unit growth or closures to analyze. ⚠ The lack of any track record, combined with no litigation or bankruptcy history, offers no meaningful insight into franchisee success or system stability. Prospective investors should view this as a speculative venture requiring extensive independent validation before committing capital.

Cookies By Design presents a high-risk opportunity given its lack of Item 19 financial performance disclosure, which prevents validation of unit-level economics. The franchise requires a moderate investment of $160k-$345k with a $30k fee and 6% royalty, but the presence of litigation is a significant ⚠ red flag. Without any disclosed outlet counts or growth data, it is impossible to assess the brand's scale or trajectory. Prospective franchisees should proceed with extreme caution and demand full financial transparency before considering this investment.

N.Y. One presents a high-risk, low-cost opportunity with a minimal $1,000 franchise fee and total investment starting at $33,641, but the 27% royalty fee is exceptionally high and will severely pressure margins. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit economics or revenue potential, making it impossible to assess profitability. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy history is a neutral point, but with no reported outlets opened or closed, the brand's operational track record and growth trajectory remain completely unproven. This franchise is a speculative venture best suited for investors willing to accept significant financial uncertainty.

PIP Printing operates with a low franchise fee of $1,000 and a moderate royalty of 6.5%, but the total investment range of $50,500 to $280,527 is broad, suggesting significant variability in build-out costs. ⚠ A major red flag is the presence of litigation, which raises concerns about franchisee relations or operational disputes. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data means there is no verifiable track record of unit economics, making it impossible to assess profitability or growth trajectory. Without outlet counts or historical openings/closures, the brand's current scale and momentum remain unclear, adding further uncertainty for prospective investors.

United Check Cashing presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of Item 19 financial performance disclosure and the presence of litigation, which prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability. The franchise fee is low at $10,000, but the total investment range of $15,100 to $297,000 is unusually wide, suggesting significant variability in build-out requirements. ⚠ The 0.2% royalty is exceptionally low, which may indicate a business model that relies heavily on other revenue streams or fees not disclosed in the FDD. Without any data on outlet growth or closures, this franchise offers no verifiable track record for prospective franchisees to evaluate.

New Life Assisted Living enters the market with a relatively low total investment range of $109,550 to $202,000 and a moderate $35,000 franchise fee, making it accessible for individual operators. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit economics or revenue potential, which is a significant risk for prospective franchisees. ✓ The franchise reports no litigation or bankruptcy history, suggesting a clean legal record, but the complete lack of outlet data—including total units, openings, and closures—prevents any assessment of brand scale or growth trajectory. This franchise offers a low-cost entry point into the assisted living sector, but the total lack of financial performance and operational history demands extensive independent due diligence.