Companies

10x Health Franchising presents a high-risk, unproven opportunity with a substantial $100,000 franchise fee and a steep 12.0% royalty, yet it lacks any Item 19 financial performance disclosure, making it impossible to assess potential returns. ⚠ The total investment range of $215,700 to $523,400 is significant for a concept with zero reported outlets opened or closed, indicating no track record of operational success or growth. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of scale and financial data suggests this is a nascent or pre-revenue franchise model. Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution given the high entry cost and total absence of performance benchmarks.

Vitality Bowls presents a high-risk investment profile due to the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, which prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or revenue potential. The franchise carries a significant red flag with active litigation, and the total investment range of $208,800 to $683,140 is substantial for a concept with no disclosed outlet count or growth data. ⚠ The lack of any information on outlets opened or closed in the last year makes it impossible to evaluate the brand's operational stability or market traction. ✓ The $40,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty are standard, but the complete opacity on financial performance and legal issues makes this a speculative venture.

TGA Premier Junior Golf Franchise offers a low-cost entry point with a total investment range of $21,450 to $62,800 and a modest $10,000 franchise fee, making it accessible for smaller operators. ⚠ However, the absence of Item 19 financial disclosures means there is no verifiable data on unit economics or franchisee earnings, which is a significant risk for prospective investors. ⚠ The presence of litigation further raises concerns about operational or legal challenges within the system. With no reported outlet growth or closures, the brand's current scale and trajectory remain opaque, limiting the ability to assess its market traction.

NY NAP TEA Master Offer presents a high-cost master franchise opportunity with a $300,000 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $624,000 to $802,200. ⚠ The absence of any Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as prospective master franchisees have no validated data on unit economics, sales performance, or profitability. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history provides a clean legal slate, but the complete lack of operational history—with no outlets opened, closed, or total units reported—makes it impossible to assess brand traction or growth trajectory. This offering carries substantial financial risk due to the high entry cost combined with zero transparency on existing performance or market validation.

CHS Inc d/b/a Cenex presents a franchise opportunity with an exceptionally low entry cost of a $750 franchise fee, which is a significant positive for prospective franchisees. However, the lack of any disclosed financial performance representation (Item 19), royalty structure, or total investment range creates a substantial information gap, making it impossible to assess potential returns or ongoing costs. The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a neutral factor, but the complete lack of data on outlet counts, growth, or closures prevents any evaluation of the system's scale or stability. This offering appears to be a minimal-cost licensing arrangement rather than a traditional franchise, but the extreme opacity around financials and operations represents a major ⚠ risk for any potential investor.

Shoo Loong Kan Hot Pot enters the U.S. market with a very high entry barrier, requiring a total investment of $1.38M to $3.34M and a $100,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data is a significant risk, as prospective franchisees cannot evaluate unit-level economics or profitability. ✓ The brand carries no litigation or bankruptcy history, but with no disclosed outlet counts or growth data, this is a high-cost, high-risk opportunity with zero transparency on operational track record.

The Point enters the market with a substantial total investment range of $355,000 to $1,264,500 and a $40,000 franchise fee, positioning it as a significant capital commitment. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history provides a clean legal and financial baseline. ⚠ However, the lack of any disclosed outlet counts or year-over-year growth data makes it impossible to assess the brand's operational scale or market traction. This absence of historical performance data is a critical red flag, as it prevents any meaningful evaluation of the franchise's stability or growth trajectory.

CK Sales Co., LLC presents a high-risk profile due to a $50,000 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $58,440 to $285,600, yet it lacks any Item 19 financial disclosure, making it impossible to assess potential earnings or performance. ⚠ The presence of litigation is a significant red flag, and the complete absence of data on total outlets, openings, or closures suggests a very limited or nascent operational history. ✓ The absence of bankruptcy is a minor positive, but the lack of scale and transparency makes this a speculative opportunity requiring extensive due diligence.

The Happy Mixer Franchising Company, LLC presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment ranging from $348,925 to $556,700 and a 6.0% royalty fee. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed outlet counts for total units, openings, and closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or franchisee turnover, representing a significant information gap for prospective investors.

Premier Rental Purchase presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of Item 19 financial performance data, meaning franchisees cannot validate earnings potential. The business carries a significant ⚠ litigation flag, which raises concerns about legal exposure and franchisor stability. With a massive investment range from $21,075 to $746,820 and no disclosed outlet growth or closures, the system's scale and trajectory are entirely opaque. This combination of high capital requirements, legal risks, and zero financial transparency makes it a speculative venture unsuitable for risk-averse investors.

Sarah Adult Day Services, Inc. presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment ranging from $351,100 to $921,200, paired with a moderate $15,000 franchise fee and a 5% royalty. ⚠ A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which warrants careful due diligence before commitment. ✓ The franchise does provide an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering some transparency on potential performance. However, the lack of any outlet data—including total units, openings, or closures—makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale or growth trajectory.

Camp Mirage presents a low-cost entry point with a total investment range of $79,250 to $123,500 and a $30,000 franchise fee, which is attractive for first-time operators. ✓ The inclusion of Item 19 financial disclosure provides transparency, and the absence of litigation or bankruptcy history suggests a clean legal standing. ⚠ However, the lack of any outlet data—including total units, openings, or closures—makes it impossible to assess brand traction, growth trajectory, or franchisee turnover, creating significant uncertainty. This franchise is a high-risk proposition due to the complete absence of operational scale and verifiable performance metrics.

Wow Wow Brands enters the market with a moderate investment range of $260,500 to $602,000 and a $30,000 franchise fee, supported by a 6% royalty. ✓ The franchise provides Item 19 financial disclosure, offering transparency on potential performance, and has no litigation or bankruptcy history. ⚠ However, the absence of any outlet data—total units, openings, or closures—makes it impossible to assess operational scale or growth trajectory. This lack of track record presents a significant risk for prospective franchisees evaluating the brand's viability.

bex+Co enters the market with a moderate investment range of $394,100 to $567,000 and a $60,000 franchise fee, supported by a 6.0% royalty and the presence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, which is a ✓ for transparency. However, the complete absence of any outlet data—total units, openings, or closures—is a major ⚠ red flag, making it impossible to assess brand traction, unit economics, or growth trajectory. Without a single operational outlet to validate the model, prospective franchisees face significant uncertainty regarding real-world performance and scalability. This lack of scale and operational history suggests a very early-stage or unproven concept, demanding extreme caution and extensive validation before any commitment.

Young Horizons School requires a substantial total investment of $1.652M to $2.389M, paired with a $60,000 franchise fee and a 7.0% royalty, positioning it as a high-cost entry in the education sector. ✓ The franchise provides an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering transparency on potential performance, and has no litigation or bankruptcy history, indicating a clean legal record. ⚠ However, the absence of any outlet data—including total units, openings, and closures—creates a critical information gap, making it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or franchisee turnover. This lack of operational history is a significant red flag, as it prevents validation of the business model's real-world viability.

Birdcall Franchising LLC presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment ranging from $752,000 to $2,638,000 and a $50,000 franchise fee, coupled with a 6.0% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed outlet counts for total units, openings, or closures makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale or growth trajectory. This absence of operational data is a significant red flag for potential franchisees evaluating system stability.

The LivBay Franchises presents a high-risk, high-cost opportunity with a total investment ranging from $370,889 to $671,955, yet it charges no upfront franchise fee. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a positive signal for stability. ⚠ However, the lack of any disclosed outlet counts for openings, closings, or total scale makes it impossible to assess the brand's operational track record or growth trajectory. This absence of data, combined with a 6.0% royalty on a significant investment, demands extreme caution from prospective franchisees.

Money Pages presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of financial performance representations (Item 19) and any operational track record, as no outlet data is provided. The franchise fee of $50,000 is substantial for a concept with no proven unit economics or growth trajectory. ⚠ The lack of Item 19 makes it impossible to validate the business model or assess potential returns. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a neutral factor, but the opaque nature of the offering and high entry cost relative to unknown performance are significant concerns.

TAPinto presents an exceptionally low-cost franchise opportunity with a total investment range of $7,775 to $11,325 and a $5,000 franchise fee, making it one of the most accessible media or publishing concepts available. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history suggests a clean operational record, which is a positive signal for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on revenue, profitability, or outlet performance, creating significant uncertainty for earnings projections. ⚠ Furthermore, the absence of reported outlet counts or growth data makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, market traction, or closure rates, leaving investors with minimal evidence of a proven business model.

Manhattan Pizza presents a high-risk opportunity with a significant total investment ranging from $404,200 to $760,900 and a franchise fee of $49,900, yet it lacks any Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving potential franchisees without validated earnings data. ⚠ The presence of litigation is a notable red flag, and the absence of any outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to assess the brand's operational stability or market traction. With no information on total outlets or recent openings, this franchise offers no evidence of a proven business model or scalability. Prospective investors should approach with extreme caution due to the combination of high costs, legal issues, and complete financial opacity.

Family Financial Centers presents a high-risk profile due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial performance disclosure, making it impossible to validate any revenue or profitability claims. The franchise fee is relatively low at $10,125, but the total investment range of $153,570 to $308,670 is significant for a concept with no disclosed outlet count or growth data. ⚠ The lack of any information on total outlets, openings, or closures over the past year suggests either a very new or extremely limited franchise system. Without Item 19 or operational scale, prospective franchisees are essentially investing blind into an unproven business model.

Hangar 54 Pizza presents an unusually low-cost entry point with a franchise fee of $0 and a total investment range starting at just $9,000, though the ceiling of $349,000 suggests significant variability in build-out requirements. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit-level revenue, profitability, or operating costs, making it impossible to assess the business model's viability. With no reported outlets opened or closed in the last year and no litigation or bankruptcy history, the brand appears to be in a very early or dormant stage. ✓ The lack of debt or legal issues is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of operational scale and financial transparency poses a high risk for prospective franchisees.

Bean Bastard Coffee presents an exceptionally low barrier to entry with a franchise fee of just $1,500 and a total investment range starting at $8,150, though the ceiling of $293,250 suggests significant variability in build-out costs. ⚠ The absence of any Item 19 financial disclosure is a major red flag, as prospective franchisees have no validated data on unit economics, revenue, or profitability to assess the opportunity. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history provides a clean legal slate, but with no reported outlets opened or closed, the brand's operational track record and growth trajectory remain entirely unproven. This concept carries high risk due to its opaque financial performance and lack of established scale, making it suitable only for investors willing to accept substantial uncertainty.

Melt n Dip Franchising LLC presents a high-risk opportunity due to the absence of any operational history or financial performance data, as the FDD lacks both an Item 19 disclosure and any outlet counts. The total investment range of $373,050 to $455,350 is substantial for a concept with no proven track record, and the $50,000 franchise fee is significant relative to the lack of validation. ⚠ The absence of any opened or closed outlets over the past year indicates this is a pre-revenue or very early-stage franchise, offering no data on unit economics or growth trajectory. While there are no litigation or bankruptcy red flags, the complete lack of scale and financial disclosure makes this an exceptionally speculative investment.

Wix Franchise, Inc. presents a high-risk opportunity due to the complete absence of any operational history, with no outlets opened, closed, or currently operating. The franchise fee is $20,000 with a 5% royalty, but the total investment range of $106,050 to $729,325 is exceptionally wide, suggesting significant uncertainty in startup costs. ✓ The franchise does provide an Item 19 financial disclosure and has no litigation or bankruptcy history, which are positive indicators. ⚠ However, the lack of any unit growth or operational track record makes this an unproven concept with no data to validate its business model.

HPB Fencing LLC presents a high-risk profile with a substantial $59,500 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $160,181 to $241,071, yet it offers no Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving potential franchisees without any validated performance data. ⚠ The presence of litigation is a significant red flag, and the complete absence of any outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to assess the brand's operational stability or market traction. This franchise demands a very high entry cost for an unproven system with no financial transparency, making it an exceptionally speculative investment.

Kidcreate Studio presents a high-risk profile due to the complete absence of financial performance representations (Item 19), leaving prospective franchisees unable to assess unit-level economics or revenue potential. The $45,000 franchise fee is notable, but without a disclosed total investment range or any outlet growth data, the scalability and financial health of the system remain opaque. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a minor positive, but ⚠ the total absence of operational scale and financial disclosure makes this a speculative investment requiring extensive independent validation.

Pizza Ranch, Inc. requires a substantial total investment ranging from $1.85 million to $4.91 million, with a relatively low franchise fee of $30,000 and a 3.5% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed outlet counts and growth data makes it impossible to assess the brand's current scale or trajectory, which is a significant transparency concern for potential investors.

Buff City Soap presents a high-cost entry point with a franchise fee of $80,800 and a total investment range reaching up to $1.28 million, coupled with a 6% royalty fee. A significant red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees without crucial revenue or profitability benchmarks. The lack of disclosed outlet counts and growth metrics further obscures the brand's operational scale and trajectory. While the company has no litigation or bankruptcy history, the opaque financial disclosure makes this a high-risk investment requiring extensive independent validation.

Sing Choi Kee enters the market with a substantial total investment range of $525,800 to $1,540,800 and a $20,000 franchise fee, positioning it as a high-cost opportunity. The 7.0% royalty is standard, and the presence of Item 19 financial disclosure is a ✓, offering prospective franchisees critical performance data. However, the complete absence of outlet counts—both total and annual openings/closures—is a ⚠ major red flag, as it prevents any assessment of brand scale, growth trajectory, or unit-level stability. Without this operational history, the franchise presents significant uncertainty despite the lack of litigation or bankruptcy filings.

Champions Martial Arts presents a moderate entry point with a franchise fee of $10,000 and a total investment range of $111,500 to $307,300. ⚠ A significant red flag is the complete absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, meaning there is no verifiable data on unit revenue, profitability, or system-wide performance. ✓ The franchise has no history of litigation or bankruptcy, which is a positive indicator of legal stability. However, without any outlet counts or growth data, it is impossible to assess the brand's scale, market traction, or closure rates, making this a high-risk, opaque opportunity.

Runza presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment ranging from $910,000 to $3,462,000 and a $30,000 franchise fee, yet it lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, making it impossible to verify unit-level profitability or performance. ⚠ The absence of any outlet growth or closure data further obscures the brand's operational health and expansion trajectory. ✓ The franchise reports no litigation or bankruptcy history, which is a positive signal for stability. However, the combination of a steep capital requirement and no financial performance data creates significant uncertainty for prospective franchisees.

Burrito Bar presents an extreme outlier in investment requirements, with a total investment range spanning from $128,750 to over $1.1 billion, which is an unprecedented and likely erroneous spread that signals a critical data integrity issue. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit economics, revenue, or profitability, making any financial projection speculative. With no reported outlets, no growth or closure data, and no litigation or bankruptcy history, the brand appears to be in a pre-operational or concept stage. ⚠ The massive, implausible investment ceiling and lack of financial performance data create a high-risk profile that demands extreme caution and independent verification before any consideration.

FIT4MOM offers an exceptionally low-cost entry point into franchising, with a total investment ranging from just $8,245 to $28,685 and a franchise fee of only $1,995. ✓ The low barrier to entry is a significant positive for prospective owner-operators. ⚠ However, the absence of Item 19 financial performance data makes it impossible to validate unit economics or revenue potential, which is a critical risk. ⚠ The presence of litigation in the franchise's history is a notable red flag that warrants further investigation before any commitment.

Unmasked Franchising, Inc. presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment range of $431,000 to $915,000 and a $30,000 franchise fee, coupled with a 5.0% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of any disclosed outlet data—including total outlets, openings, and closures—makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or operational stability. This absence of performance history is a significant red flag for prospective franchisees evaluating the system's viability.

Lightbridge Academy requires a substantial total investment ranging from $1.07M to $3.12M, with a $40K franchise fee and a 7% royalty, positioning it as a high-cost opportunity. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial history. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed outlet counts and growth data makes it impossible to assess the brand's actual scale or recent expansion trajectory. This franchise presents a significant capital commitment with limited transparency on operational performance.

Junkluggers Franchising SPE LLC presents a ⚠ high-risk profile due to a complete lack of operational transparency, with critical data regarding unit count, fees, and investment costs currently listed as N/A. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ prevents any validation of potential ROI, making it impossible to conduct a standard financial analysis. While the franchise benefits from a ✓ clean legal record with no history of litigation or bankruptcy, the severe data limitations suggest the system may lack the scale or stability required for a secure investment.

Onward Physical Therapy, LLC presents a low-cost entry point with a total investment of $21,500 to $61,000 and no franchise fee, but the 10% royalty is significant for a service-based business. ⚠ A major red flag is the presence of litigation, which raises concerns about operational or legal stability. ✓ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit economics or profitability, making it impossible to assess performance. ⚠ Without any outlet growth or closure data, the franchise lacks a track record, leaving potential franchisees with substantial uncertainty.

B-Land Beauty enters the market with a moderate initial investment of $318,761 to $549,263 and a $25,500 franchise fee, but the absence of any Item 19 financial disclosure is a critical ⚠ red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. The lack of reported outlet counts, including no data on openings or closures, makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale or growth trajectory. While the 5.0% royalty is standard and there are no litigation or bankruptcy concerns, the complete opacity around financial performance and operational history presents a high-risk profile for investors.

This franchise presents a severe lack of transparency, with critical data regarding scale, fees, and total investment listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential ROI or unit economics. ⚠ With no available metrics on outlets opened or closed last year, the brand’s growth trajectory and operational stability cannot be analyzed.

Naan-Tastic presents a significant risk profile due to the complete absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated data on unit-level revenue or profitability. The total investment range of $276,700 to $591,800 is substantial for a concept with no disclosed outlet count or growth trajectory, making it impossible to assess market acceptance or operational stability. While the franchise carries no litigation or bankruptcy history, the lack of any operational scale or historical performance data is a major ⚠ red flag. This opportunity requires extensive independent validation and a high tolerance for uncertainty before any commitment.

Ubuildit Holdings presents a moderate entry point with a franchise fee of $35,000 and a total investment range of $78,400 to $220,200. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history suggests a clean legal and financial background. ⚠ However, the lack of disclosed royalty rates and outlet growth data makes it impossible to assess ongoing costs or expansion momentum. This franchise offers limited transparency for prospective investors evaluating its operational track record.

Vision Source operates with a unique, low-barrier model featuring a $0 franchise fee and a wide investment range of $500 to $450,000, which suggests a highly variable setup cost depending on the practice type. The absence of Item 19 financial performance data is a significant ⚠ red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating potential earnings or profitability. With no reported litigation or bankruptcy, the brand appears legally stable, but the complete lack of outlet growth or closure data makes it impossible to assess its current scale or trajectory. This franchise may appeal to optometry professionals seeking affiliation, but the opaque financial disclosure and missing operational metrics demand thorough independent due diligence.

NTGY INC presents a low barrier to entry with a modest $6,500 franchise fee and a total investment ranging from $41,426 to $68,250 ✓. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure represents a significant risk, as it prevents prospective franchisees from verifying potential earnings or economic viability ⚠. Additionally, the lack of data regarding royalty rates, outlet counts, and growth trajectory suggests a lack of operational transparency that warrants extreme caution ⚠.

GRNA FC Group LLC currently lacks the operational scale and financial transparency required for a credible franchise assessment, as evidenced by missing data for total outlets, fees, and investment costs. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation prevents an analysis of potential return on investment. ⚠ With no available data on unit growth or openings, the brand's trajectory and market viability remain unproven and high-risk.

GRNA Street Pizza Group LLC currently presents an unquantifiable risk profile due to a complete lack of operational and financial transparency. ⚠ Critical data points regarding scale, fees, and total investment are listed as N/A, and the absence of an Item 19 prevents any validation of potential ROI. ⚠ Prospective investors should treat this opportunity with extreme caution, as the missing metrics suggest the franchise may lack an established or proven business model.

This franchise presents a critical transparency risk, as key data points regarding scale, fees, and total investment are listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further prevents any meaningful assessment of unit economics or potential return on investment. ✓ While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive indicator of legal stability, the overall data vacuum makes this a high-risk proposition for due diligence.

KID'S HAVEN GROUP LLC presents a significant investment risk due to the absence of any Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees without validated earnings expectations. The franchise fee is set at $50,000, with a 6.0% royalty, but the total investment range is exceptionally wide at $323,500 to $6,415,000, suggesting a highly variable business model. ⚠ The lack of any disclosed outlet counts, including total units, openings, or closures, makes it impossible to assess the brand's scale, growth trajectory, or operational stability. Without litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary red flag is the complete opacity regarding financial performance and system size, which demands extreme caution.

AltoCFO enters the franchise market with a high $50,000 franchise fee and a steep 10.0% royalty, yet offers a relatively low total investment range of $77,050 to $116,450. ⚠ The absence of any Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as prospective franchisees have no validated data on unit economics or revenue expectations. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history provides a clean legal slate, but with no reported outlets opened or closed, the brand has zero proven operational track record. This opportunity carries substantial risk for investors given the high royalty burden and complete lack of financial performance transparency.

Oromo Cafe presents a relatively low-cost entry point in the franchise space, with a $35,000 franchise fee and total investment ranging from $203,750 to $384,500. ⚠ A significant red flag is the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees with no validated revenue or profitability benchmarks. ✓ The brand carries no litigation or bankruptcy history, which is a positive indicator of corporate stability. However, with no disclosed outlet counts or growth data, the franchise lacks the transparency needed to assess its operational scale or expansion trajectory.