Companies

MedSpa of America Franchise, LLC is an early-stage concept with virtually no scale, operating only one total outlet and showing zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant risk for investors, particularly given the unproven nature of the system. While the total investment of $101,600 to $200,000 is relatively accessible, the combination of a $45,000 franchise fee and 7% royalty rate demands validation that this model currently lacks.

305 Fitness Franchising Co. LLC presents a high-risk profile characterized by severe operational contraction, having closed four units last year to leave only a single outlet remaining. While the brand demonstrates strong unit economics with an AUV of roughly $1.46 million ✓, this data point is statistically insignificant and potentially misleading given the massive scale-back. The combination of a high total investment ($295k-$788k) and active litigation ⚠ further overshadows the potential for returns.

Bowie Barker is an ultra-early-stage concept with a single corporate outlet, making it a high-risk venture despite a clean legal record. ⚠ The investment range of $304k-$490k is substantial for an unproven model that lacks an Item 19 financial performance representation. ✓ The absence of litigation, bankruptcy, or unit closures suggests stable initial management, but the franchise offers no statistical validation or economies of scale.

Broadway Hot & Honey Chicken presents a compelling but unproven financial model, boasting an impressive AUV of $2.2 million against a mid-range total investment of $340k-$671k. ✓ The concept features a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy, suggesting stable management. ⚠ However, with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, the franchise lacks the operational scale to validate system-wide replicability. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face a high-risk proposition buying into a single-unit operation with no track record of network expansion.

Medcross presents a compelling but singular investment case, characterized by exceptional unit economics with an AUV of over $5.3 million against a low total investment of roughly $100k to $138k. ✓ The franchise offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy, though the 7.5% royalty fee is a significant operational cost. ⚠ The primary risk is the total lack of scale and growth trajectory, as the system consists of only one outlet with zero new openings last year.

Apostle Radon and Indoor Air Solutions presents a compelling unit-level economics case with an AUV of $434,683 against a mid-range total investment, offering a strong potential return on investment. ✓ However, the concept is currently defined by a significant lack of scale, operating with only one total outlet and registering zero growth in the last year. ⚠ While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive indicator, the single-unit footprint makes it difficult to validate the replicability of the business model. ⚠ Prospective partners must weigh the attractive revenue figures against the high risks associated with an unproven, nascent franchise system.

Sub-Ology Franchising presents a compelling unit-level economic model with an Average Unit Volume of $946,661 ✓, though this figure is derived from a single operating location. The total investment requirement of $279,553 to $438,458 is significant ⚠, especially given the lack of a proven track record at scale. With zero new outlets opened and a static footprint of one unit, the concept remains in its infancy and poses a high risk regarding operational reproducibility ⚠.

Affordable Egress Inc. presents a compelling but high-risk profile characterized by an extreme lack of scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ✓ The unit economics are strong, featuring a robust Average Unit Volume ($851,770) against a mid-range total investment ($178k-$299k). ⚠ However, the system is statistically insignificant, offering no proof of replicability or stability for new investors. ⚠ The high franchise fee ($55,000) is difficult to justify given the absence of an established network or operational history.

Abbey Road Institute presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity with a substantial franchise fee of $250,000 and a total estimated cost reaching up to $2.46 million. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive indicator of operational stability, and the provision of an Item 19 offers crucial financial transparency. ⚠ However, the network consists of only a single outlet with zero growth recorded last year, signaling a stagnant trajectory and significant execution risk for new franchisees.

Blank Mason presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $231,350 to $596,350, though it validates its economic model with a strong Average Unit Volume of $494,603. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean legal record with no litigation or bankruptcy history, but its single-unit footprint and stagnant growth (0 openings) indicate the concept is currently unproven at scale. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must exercise caution, as the lack of an operational track record makes it difficult to assess long-term viability despite the disclosed financial performance.

VP Holdings, LLC is an extremely early-stage or "start-up" franchise concept with only one total outlet, indicating an unproven business model with high execution risk. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating potential returns, which is a significant drawback given the substantial $293,000 to $687,500 investment. ⚠ While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a basic positive ✓, the $60,000 franchise fee commands a premium typically reserved for established brands. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution as there is no historical performance data or growth trajectory to analyze.

Ez Paella Group presents a compelling but unproven investment opportunity, characterized by a single unit generating a strong AUV of $746,015. ✓ The franchise offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy, though the lack of new openings last year suggests the concept is still in the very early stages of scaling. ⚠ With a total investment ranging from $207,850 to $392,000, the entry cost is moderate relative to the high revenue potential, but the single-unit footprint provides limited validation of the business model's replicability.

Nash & Smashed presents a compelling but high-risk profile, characterized by an exceptionally strong Average Unit Volume of $1,966,168 ✓ despite being a single-unit operation with no proven scale. The franchise offers a moderate entry fee of $20,000, though the total investment varies drastically from $91k to $776k ⚠, creating uncertainty regarding startup capital requirements. While the brand shows 100% unit retention with no closures ✓, the existence of litigation ⚠ and lack of historical growth data suggest potential instability for prospective franchisees.

Grieb Carwash currently lacks scale with a single operating outlet and zero recent growth, signaling an unproven franchise model. ⚠ The financial barriers are exceptionally high, requiring a total investment of up to $3.3 million alongside a steep 8.0% royalty fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further complicates the value proposition, offering investors no data to validate potential returns against the significant capital risk.

Fuelify Franchising LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal market validation, presenting a high risk for prospective franchisees despite the absence of litigation or bankruptcy. ✓ The low total investment entry point of $82,500 to $127,000 is attractive, though the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes potential returns difficult to quantify. ⚠ With zero outlets opened last year and only one total location, the system lacks a proven growth trajectory or economies of scale.

The Look Salon Suites presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity requiring a total spend of up to $1.05 million, positioning it in the premium segment of the beauty real estate market. ✓ The provision of an Item 19 financial disclosure and a clean legal record regarding litigation and bankruptcy offer transparency and stability for potential investors. ⚠ However, the concept currently lacks proof of scale or market traction, operating as a single unit with zero growth over the last year. ⚠ Consequently, this franchise carries significant execution risk typical of an unproven startup despite its substantial capital requirements.

This franchise presents a high-risk opportunity characterized by a total lack of scale with only one corporate outlet and zero franchise growth in the last year. ⚠ The investment range of $370,000 to $838,500 is substantial for an unproven concept, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of potential returns. ⚠ With a standard 5.0% royalty but no operational track record or network effect, the offering lacks the necessary data to justify the capital requirement.

Tandoori Pizza presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of scale, operating as a single-unit concept with zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The total investment range of $373,675 to $659,300 is steep for an unproven model that lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, making it difficult to validate potential returns. ⚠ Additionally, the 6.5% royalty fee adds an ongoing financial burden to a system that has yet to demonstrate franchise viability or stability.

JFC Franchise is currently a high-risk, early-stage concept with only one total outlet, offering no statistical proof of a replicable business model. ⚠ The $100,000 franchise fee is aggressive for a startup with no Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving investors with no data to validate potential returns. ✓ While the investment range of $113,000 to $351,000 is relatively accessible and the single unit remained open, the lack of scale and transparency makes this a speculative venture.

AleCall presents a high-risk opportunity due to its total lack of scale, operating as a single-unit concept with zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise requires a significant capital investment of up to $459,500 yet fails to provide an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering no data to validate potential returns. ⚠ With no proven track record of replication or system-wide expansion, this concept remains an unproven startup rather than a stable franchise system.

The Local Fry presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $449,000 to $703,000, yet it lacks the operational validation of a proven chain. ⚠ With only one total outlet and zero growth last year, the concept remains unproven at scale, offering no track record of replication. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further complicates the investment thesis, as potential franchisees cannot verify profitability metrics against the significant upfront capital required.

Bright Brothers Group presents a high-risk profile as a startup concept with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, making it an unproven venture rather than an established system. ✓ The franchise offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy and provides financial transparency via an Item 19, while the total investment of $170k-$349k is relatively accessible. ⚠ However, the combination of a $45,000 franchise fee and a 6.5% royalty is aggressive for a brand with no scale or operating history to validate the model.

The Halal Guys Franchise Inc. is in a nascent stage of development with only one total outlet, indicating a high-risk pilot phase despite the brand's established global reputation. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant drawback for prospective investors, especially given the wide total investment range of $231,600 to $834,000. ✓ However, the initial growth trajectory appears stable with two openings and zero closures last year, and the corporate structure is clean with no history of litigation or bankruptcy.

Dog of All Trades, LLC presents an extremely limited operational history with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, making it a de facto startup despite offering franchises. ✓ The investment range of $79,700 - $198,800 is relatively accessible, and the 3.0% royalty rate is competitive for the sector. ⚠ However, the lack of scale represents a significant risk, as the system lacks proof of concept and replicable success metrics. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution, as purchasing this concept is essentially funding a startup experiment rather than joining an established network.

Crust Franchisingoration is an extremely high-risk proposition characterized by a total lack of scale with only one corporate outlet currently operating. ⚠ The investment requirement is steep ($662k–$930k) for an unproven concept that lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, meaning potential returns remain completely unverified. ⚠ With zero growth last year and no franchisee footprint, this concept offers no track record of success or stability.

ShippingShop LLC is an early-stage concept with minimal operational history, evidenced by a single outlet and a lack of Item 19 financial performance disclosures. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive sign, the $27,000 franchise fee and total investment up to $209,000 represent a significant capital commitment for an unproven system. The addition of one unit last year indicates nominal growth, yet the lack of established scale and earnings data makes this a high-risk venture.

The White Bounce House is currently a single-unit operation with no proven scale or franchise track record. ✓ The low franchise fee of $15,000 and total investment between $40,750 and $108,250 offer an accessible entry point for entrepreneurs. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure combined with a high 8.0% royalty fee presents a significant risk regarding potential return on investment. ⚠ With zero outlets opened or closed last year, the concept remains untested as a scalable franchise model.

Tohc Franchising is an extremely early-stage concept with virtually no scale, having launched only one total outlet in the last year. ✓ The franchise offers a verified financial performance representation (Item 19) and a clean litigation history, but ⚠ a disclosed bankruptcy history poses a significant risk to system stability. ⚠ With a total investment ranging up to nearly $700k, this opportunity presents a high-risk profile typical of unproven startup franchises.

Take it Off! Spa is an extremely early-stage or unproven concept with a single operating outlet and zero growth last year, signaling a lack of market traction. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating the business model’s profitability, which is a significant risk given the startup nature of the brand. While the entry cost of $109,900 to $250,500 is relatively moderate, the $39,000 franchise fee is high relative to the limited support and infrastructure likely available.

Southern Solar Franchise Systems offers a high-reward opportunity with an exceptional Average Unit Volume of $3.88M, though this performance is based on a single corporate outlet rather than a diversified network of franchisees. ✓ The financial transparency provided in Item 19 and the absence of litigation or bankruptcy are strong positives for the brand's stability. ⚠ However, the lack of new outlet openings last year indicates stagnant growth, making the $65,000 franchise fee a risky investment for a system with no current franchise expansion.

This franchise presents a high-risk profile due to its minimal scale, operating with only a single total outlet after opening one location in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement of $194,400 to $515,000 is substantial relative to the concept's lack of operational history and absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure. ⚠ With no proven track record of closures or growth, prospective franchisees are essentially funding a startup with limited data to support the $40,000 franchise fee and 6.0% royalty rate.

Skill Samurai, Inc. is an extremely early-stage concept with only one total outlet, making it a high-risk startup venture rather than an established brand. ⚠ The franchise lacks an Item 19 financial performance representation, offering no data to validate the business model or potential return on investment. ✓ The initial unit is stable with no closures, litigation, or bankruptcy, but the high 7.0% royalty fee significantly impacts profitability given the lack of economies of scale.

Scoop Brothers is currently a single-unit operation with no growth trajectory, having opened and closed zero outlets last year. ✓ The franchise offers a low total investment entry point ($132,500 - $197,000) and reports a solid Average Unit Volume of $352,738 with a clean legal record. ⚠ However, the lack of scale presents a significant risk, as the system lacks proven replication data, and the 7.5% royalty fee is aggressive for a concept with minimal operational history.

GH Builders NY is currently a single-unit operation, indicating it is either a startup or a new franchise system with a minimal track record of scale. While the franchise benefits from a clean history regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ prevents prospective investors from validating potential earnings. Additionally, the $54,000 franchise fee is aggressive for a new brand ⚠, representing a high entry cost relative to the system's limited operational history and support infrastructure.

Disaster Blaster National presents a compelling value proposition with a low total investment ($136k-$242k) relative to a strong Average Unit Volume of $609,413 ✓. However, the system currently consists of only one total outlet and recorded zero growth last year, indicating the franchise is unproven at scale ⚠. While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive sign, potential investors face significant risk buying into a concept with an unestablished footprint.

Therannu is a nascent franchise system consisting of a single outlet with zero new locations opened last year, indicating a lack of current growth momentum and proven scalability. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive sign, the high initial investment of nearly $400k to $635k represents a significant risk for an unproven concept. The brand offers transparency through an Item 19 disclosure showing an AUV of $712,438, yet potential franchisees should approach with caution due to the limited operating history and lack of expansion.

The Grace Galleries IFG, Inc. presents a questionable investment profile due to a complete lack of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ✓ The franchise offers a low entry barrier with a total investment of $91k–$145.7k and a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents verification of profitability, and the 10% royalty rate is steep for a system with no proven track record or momentum.

Blushington Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ The investment requirement is steep ($485,500 - $680,100) relative to the concept's maturity, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of potential returns. ⚠ With a single unit and no new openings, the system lacks the proven operational history typically required to justify the $40,000 franchise fee and 7.0% royalty rate.

Milk Jar Cookies is currently a single-unit operation with a high total investment ranging from roughly $328,000 to $751,000, which suggests a capital-intensive entry point for an unproven franchise model. While the lack of litigation, bankruptcy, or closures offers a clean background, the fact that zero new outlets opened last year indicates a stagnant growth trajectory. Prospective franchisees should proceed with caution, as the 7.0% royalty fee and significant startup costs are not yet supported by a track record of operational scale.

Lawn Pride presents a low-risk profile with a clean history regarding litigation and bankruptcy, supported by the transparency of an Item 19 financial disclosure. ✓ However, the franchise currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and recorded zero growth last year, suggesting the concept is either extremely niche or stagnant. ⚠ With an 8.0% royalty rate and a total investment approaching $154,000, the lack of an established network poses a significant risk for prospective franchisees. ⚠

PetNmind presents a high-risk profile due to its minimal scale, operating with only one total outlet and showing zero growth over the last year. While the franchise offers a clean background with no litigation or bankruptcy and reports a strong Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $401,475, the lack of operational history makes it difficult to validate the sustainability of this performance against the $159,700 to $299,000 investment. Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution, as the system currently lacks the proven track record and network effects typically associated with a $40,000 franchise fee.

Goldsainte Franchise, LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with only one total outlet, offering a low entry point of $177,500 to $320,000. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive initial indicator, but the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of unit economics. ⚠ A royalty rate of 11.0% is aggressive for a new brand, and the single-unit footprint offers no track record of scalability or sustained performance.

HaloHeat Sauna Studios is currently a single-unit operation with no franchise validation, making it a high-risk "ground floor" opportunity despite its clean legal record ✓. The brand requires a substantial capital investment of $500k–$800k, which is a significant financial commitment ⚠ given the total lack of an Item 19 financial performance disclosure. With only one outlet opened and zero closed last year, the concept lacks the historical data and scale necessary to mitigate risk for prospective investors ⚠.

This franchise presents a low-risk administrative profile with no history of litigation or bankruptcy, but its single-unit scale suggests it is an unproven concept with minimal market penetration. ✓ The entry fee is relatively accessible, though the total investment varies significantly, requiring careful capital planning. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure combined with zero recent growth makes it difficult to assess profitability or future trajectory.

Advantage College Planning presents a high-margin opportunity with an Average Unit Volume of $580,957 against a mid-range total investment of $72k-$102k. ✓ However, the concept currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, making it a de facto startup risk despite offering financial performance disclosures. ⚠ Prospective buyers must weigh the strong revenue potential against the absence of an established operational track record or network validation.

The Carpet Chemist Franchising LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment of $82.3k-$120.7k and a healthy Item 19 disclosure showing an AUV of $283,000 ✓. However, the system currently consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating the concept is unproven at scale ⚠. Additionally, prospective franchisees should note that the 8.0% royalty fee is relatively high for the cleaning industry, which could impact margins despite the strong revenue potential.

Kitchen Guard Services presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $173,700 to $308,550 and a substantial $44,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The lack of an existing network (1 total outlet) and zero growth last year indicate the concept is unproven at scale, posing significant execution risks for early adopters. ✓ The franchise offers financial transparency through an Item 19 disclosure and maintains a clean legal record, though the standard 8.0% royalty rate adds ongoing pressure to margins.

Kinya presents a high-barrier investment opportunity requiring a total commitment of up to $1.56M, though it mitigates ongoing costs with a low 2.0% royalty rate ✓. The franchise is currently in a proof-of-concept stage with a single operating unit and no historical closures ⚠. A critical risk factor is the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving potential investors without validated earnings data to justify the substantial capital requirement ⚠.

Elder-Well presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of scale, operating as a single-unit concept with zero growth in the last year. ✓ The franchise offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy and provides financial transparency in Item 19. ⚠ However, the single operating outlet makes it difficult to validate the $48,500 franchise fee against proven replicability. ⚠ Investors face a high-risk scenario entering a concept with no established trajectory or operational history.

Karak House Franchising Company LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with only one total outlet, making it a high-risk venture despite a clean legal record with no litigation or bankruptcy ✓. The franchise offers solid financial transparency through an Item 19, but the total investment of $260,800 to $408,700 is significant relative to the lack of operational history ⚠. With zero net growth last year, potential investors should be cautious of an unproven model that lacks the validation of a multi-unit track record.