Companies
Column Legend (click to collapse)
Growth = (opened-closed)/total (20%+ hot, -10% shrinking)
AUV = Avg Unit Volume
%Achv = % achieving average
T = Terminations
NR = Non-Renewals
CO = Ceased Operations
Fail% = Failure rate (T+NR+CO)/total
Risk = Score 0-100 (0-29 low/30-59 med/60+ high)
19 = Has Item 19
L = Litigation
B = Bankruptcy
Tip: Select checkboxes to compare up to 6 franchises side-by-side
| Name | Industry | Files | Fee | Royalty | Investment | Outlets ▼ | Growth | AUV | Median | %Achv | T/NR/CO | Fail% | Risk | GM/EB | Flags | Updated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | Child Services | 1 |
$49K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$149K–$228K
|
3
0F
/
3C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
DEA Music & Art is a micro-scale franchise with only 3 total outlets and zero unit growth or closures in the past year, indicating a stagnant or pre-growth phase. The total investment range of $149,433 to $228,133 is moderate for a children's enrichment concept, though the $49,000 franchise fee is relatively high for such a small system. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as prospective franchisees cannot evaluate unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. ✓ On the positive side, the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, but the lack of any recent expansion suggests limited operational validation or market traction.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| P | Education & Training | 13 |
$43K
|
8.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$53K–$71K
|
3
+1
3F
/
0C
|
+50.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
PREP ACADEMY TUTORS USA, INC. is a micro-scale franchise with only 3 total outlets and a very low total investment range of $52,600 to $70,600, making it accessible for entry-level investors. ✓ The brand shows positive momentum with 1 outlet opened and 0 closed in the last year, indicating stable growth from a tiny base. ⚠ However, the absence of Item 19 financial performance data is a significant red flag, as prospective franchisees cannot validate unit-level economics or earnings potential. ⚠ The 8% royalty fee is relatively high for such a low-cost investment, and the lack of litigation or bankruptcy provides only minimal comfort given the lack of financial disclosure.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| P |
+1
Pizzawala’s®
|
Food & Beverage | 3 |
$25K
|
5.0%
+5.0%ad
|
$376K–$637K
|
3
+1
3F
/
0C
|
+50.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | |
|
Pizzawala’s operates at a very small scale with only 3 total outlets, which is a significant risk for prospective franchisees. ✓ The brand shows positive momentum with 1 outlet opened and 0 closed last year, but the total investment range of $376,000 to $637,000 is substantial for such an unproven system. ⚠ A major red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial performance data, making it impossible to evaluate unit-level economics or validate the business model. Without litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary concern remains the lack of scale and financial transparency.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$35K–$90K
|
3.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$374K–$620K
|
3
+2
2F
/
1C
|
+200.0%
+2
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Cho Dang is a very small, emerging franchise with only 3 total outlets, though it showed positive growth by opening 2 units last year with no closures. The total investment range of $373,500 to $620,000 is moderate, supported by a low 3% royalty fee and a $35,000 franchise fee. ⚠ A significant red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial performance disclosure, making it impossible to assess unit-level profitability or validate the brand's economic model. ✓ The clean litigation and bankruptcy history provide some reassurance, but the lack of financial data and tiny scale present substantial risk for prospective franchisees.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$50K
|
3.5%
+1.5%ad
|
$238K–$434K
|
3
0F
/
3C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
APCF Inc. operates a very small network of just 3 outlets with no recent growth, as it opened and closed zero locations last year. The franchise requires a substantial total investment of $238,000 to $434,000, including a $50,000 franchise fee, with a 3.5% royalty. ⚠ A significant red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees without any earnings projections to assess viability. ✓ On a positive note, there is no litigation or bankruptcy history, but the stagnant scale and lack of financial disclosure make this a high-risk, unproven opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| W | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$30K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$335K–$843K
|
3
0F
/
3C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
WADAYA MAZEMEN AND RAMEN is a micro-scale franchise with only 3 total outlets and zero net growth in the last year, indicating no current expansion momentum. ✓ The franchise offers financial disclosure (Item 19) and has no litigation or bankruptcy history, which are positive signs for transparency and stability. ⚠ However, the total investment range of $334,500 to $842,500 is relatively high for a brand with such limited scale and no recent openings, raising concerns about unit-level viability. ✓ The $30,000 franchise fee and 5% royalty are standard, but the lack of any new outlet growth suggests potential challenges in franchisee recruitment or market demand.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Pet Services | 14 |
$40K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
— |
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
$873K
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 |
53%gm
|
19 | 1 month | ||
|
Bowie Barker is an extremely early-stage franchise with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth over the past year, indicating no proven expansion model. The disclosed average unit volume of $873,274 is a positive ✓, but the total investment range of $315,325 to $618,578 is exceptionally high for such a small system, creating significant financial risk for early adopters. The $40,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty are standard, yet the lack of any new openings or closures suggests the concept may still be in a pilot phase. ⚠ The combination of a tiny footprint, massive capital requirement, and stagnant growth makes this a high-risk opportunity with limited validation.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| D | Cleaning & Restoration | 3 |
$43K
|
— |
$54K–$68K
|
2
2F
/
0C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Daigle Cleaning Systems is an extremely small franchise with only 2 total outlets and zero unit growth or closures in the past year, indicating a stagnant or nascent system. The total investment is low at $54,000 to $67,900, but the franchise fee of $43,000 consumes the vast majority of that capital, leaving minimal working capital for operations. A major red flag is the 12,000% royalty rate, which appears to be a data error or an unsustainable structure that would make profitability impossible. ✓ Low entry cost is offset by ⚠ a lack of Item 19 financial performance data and ⚠ a highly questionable royalty model that demands scrutiny.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Fitness & Wellness | 13 |
$25K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$35K–$294K
|
2
+1
2F
/
0C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 1/0/1 | 50.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
Aira Fitness is a micro-scale franchise with only 2 total outlets, having opened 2 and closed 1 in the last year, which signals a net gain of just 1 unit and raises ⚠ concerns about operational stability. The total investment range of $34,800 to $294,060 is broad, suggesting significant variability in build-out costs, though the $25,000 franchise fee and 5% royalty are moderate. ✓ The presence of Item 19 financial disclosure provides some transparency, and the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive. However, the extremely small system size and recent closure make this a high-risk, unproven concept for prospective franchisees.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| N | Business Services | 10 |
$35K–$75K
|
— |
$48K–$120K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
$296K
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
NTV 360 LLC is a micro-scale franchise with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth over the past year, indicating no expansion momentum. ✓ The franchise offers a low total investment range of $48,150 to $120,405 and reports a strong average unit volume (AUV) of $295,533, suggesting solid unit-level economics. ⚠ However, the absence of a royalty fee is unusual and may signal a different revenue model or limited ongoing support from the franchisor. The lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive, but the tiny system size and stagnant growth present significant risk for prospective franchisees.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| G | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$30K
|
5.0%
+1.3%ad
|
$303K–$435K
|
2
+1
0F
/
2C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
$1.2M
|
— | 100% | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
Gai Chicken is a nascent concept with only 2 total outlets, having opened 1 in the last year with no closures, indicating a controlled, early-stage rollout. ✓ The franchise reports a strong average unit volume (AUV) of $1,242,417, which is a significant positive for a relatively low total investment range of $302,900 to $435,400. ⚠ However, the very small sample size of just two locations makes this AUV statistically unreliable and not indicative of proven system-wide performance. The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a clean slate, but the high franchise fee of $29,900 relative to the brand's infancy presents a notable risk for early adopters.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| H | Food & Beverage | 6 |
$40K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$409K–$840K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 |
72%gm
22%eb
|
19 | 1 month | ||
|
Harlem Shake operates a minuscule network of just 2 total outlets with zero net growth over the past year, indicating a stalled or pre-revenue concept. The franchise fee of $40,000 and total investment range of $409,000 to $840,000 represent a significant capital commitment for a brand with virtually no operational track record. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings provides a clean legal slate. ⚠ The lack of any recent unit openings or closures suggests the brand has not yet proven its ability to scale or sustain operations, making this a high-risk, unproven investment opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Other | 1 |
$19K–$29K
|
7.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$33K–$56K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
Soccer6 Franchise LLC is a micro-scale concept with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth in the past year, indicating no current expansion momentum. ✓ The low total investment range of $32,550 to $56,150 and a $19,000 franchise fee make it one of the most affordable entry points in franchising. ⚠ However, the 7.0% royalty is relatively high for such a small system, and the absence of any new openings or closures suggests the brand may be stagnant or still validating its business model. ✓ The presence of Item 19 financial disclosure provides some transparency, but the tiny footprint and lack of growth are significant concerns for prospective franchisees.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Food & Beverage | 4 |
$5K–$35K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$51K–$350K
|
2
2F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
$1.2M
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 |
76%gm
|
19 | 1 month | ||
|
Cookies N Cream operates a minuscule 2-unit system with zero net growth over the past year, signaling a complete lack of expansion momentum. ✓ The franchise offers a low entry fee of $4,999 and a reported average unit volume (AUV) of $1.2 million, which is exceptionally high for such a small sample size. ⚠ However, the total investment range of $51k to $350k is wide, and the 5% royalty on a single-unit AUV of over $1.2 million may not be sustainable or replicable for new franchisees. With no litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary risk is the unproven scalability and the reliability of the financial disclosure from just two locations.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| G | Financial Services | 3 |
$32K–$40K
|
12.5%
+3.0%ad
|
$128K–$188K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
G.I. Tax Investments, Inc. is a micro-scale franchise with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth over the past year, indicating no expansion momentum. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy provides a clean legal record, and the Item 19 financial disclosure offers transparency for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the total investment range of $127,500 to $188,200 is moderate, but the 12.5% royalty fee is notably high for a brand with such limited scale and no recent openings. This franchise presents a high-risk, unproven opportunity with minimal validation from existing unit performance or growth.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 3 |
$38K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$227K–$531K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
$113K
|
$117K | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
MacQue's BBQ International Inc. operates at a micro-scale with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth over the past year, indicating no expansion momentum. The total investment range of $227,000 to $530,500 is moderate for a BBQ concept, though the franchise fee of $37,500 and 6% royalty are standard. ✓ The Item 19 disclosure reveals a low average unit volume of just $113,452, which raises significant concerns about revenue potential and profitability for franchisees. ⚠ With no litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary red flag is the extremely limited operating history and unproven business model at scale.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| T | Real Estate | 1 |
$25K
|
5.5%
+0.5%ad
|
$82K–$145K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 20 | — | 19 L | 1 month | ||
|
The Oceanaire Realty is a nascent franchise with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth over the past year, indicating a stalled or pre-growth phase. The total investment range of $81,700 to $144,850 is relatively low, but the $25,000 franchise fee and 5.5% royalty are standard for the real estate sector. ⚠ A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which introduces legal and reputational risk for prospective franchisees. ✓ The inclusion of Item 19 financial disclosure provides some transparency, though the lack of recent outlet openings or closures suggests the brand has yet to prove its scalability.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| D | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$35K–$59K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$229K–$1.0M
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
DMZ Franchising, LLC is a nascent operation with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth over the past year, indicating no proven expansion momentum. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy provides a clean legal slate, and the franchise fee is moderate at $35,000. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as prospective franchisees cannot verify any earnings claims. ⚠ The total investment range is exceptionally wide ($229K to over $1M), suggesting undefined or highly variable business models, which adds considerable risk for a brand with no track record of unit growth.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| " | Food & Beverage | 3 |
$35K
|
7.0%
+5.0%ad
|
$624K–$1.1M
|
2
1F
/
1C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Body Energy and Body Energy Club is a micro-scale franchise with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth over the past year, indicating no expansion momentum. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy provides a clean legal record, but ⚠ the lack of Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit profitability or revenue. ⚠ The total investment range of $624,000 to $1,123,500 is substantial for a brand with such limited scale and no proven track record, while the 7% royalty adds ongoing cost pressure. This concept carries high financial risk for prospective franchisees given its tiny footprint and opaque performance metrics.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Home Services | 2 |
$60K
|
10.0%
|
$73K–$337K
|
2
+1
1F
/
1C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 20 | — | L | 1 month | ||
|
Missquito® is a nascent franchise with only 2 total outlets and a single opening in the past year, indicating a very early-stage concept with minimal proof of scale. The franchise fee of $59,500 and 10% royalty are high for a brand with no Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profitability data. A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which introduces legal risk and potential brand instability. Given the high investment range of up to $336,700, the lack of financial performance data and the litigation issue make this a high-risk opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| T | Senior Care | 2 |
$50K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$82K–$104K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
$412K
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
Tootl Franchising operates a very small system of just 2 outlets with no growth or closures in the last year, indicating a stagnant or pre-growth phase. ✓ The franchise reports a strong average unit volume (AUV) of $412,151, which is a positive sign for unit economics, though this is based on a tiny sample size. ⚠ The total investment range of $81,900 to $104,400 is relatively low, but the $49,900 franchise fee and 6% royalty are significant relative to that investment. ⚠ The lack of any new openings or closures suggests the concept has not yet proven its scalability or market demand beyond its initial locations.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| K | Food & Beverage | 3 |
$25K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$345K–$544K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
Kuma Ani is a micro-scale franchise with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth in the last year, indicating no current expansion momentum. The total investment range of $344,500 to $544,000 is moderate, supported by a relatively low $25,000 franchise fee and a 5.0% royalty. ✓ The presence of Item 19 financial disclosure provides transparency for prospective franchisees. ⚠ However, the complete lack of recent openings or closures suggests the brand is either in a holding pattern or has not yet proven its ability to scale beyond a single-unit operation.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Fitness & Wellness | 1 |
$35K–$50K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$193K–$728K
|
2
1F
/
1C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Sweatheory is a nascent franchise with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth in the last year, indicating no proven expansion model. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a clean slate, but ⚠ the lack of Item 19 financial performance data makes it impossible to assess unit-level profitability. The total investment range of $192,545 to $728,105 is broad and relatively high for a concept with no track record, while the $35,000 franchise fee and 5% royalty are standard. ⚠ The complete lack of recent openings or closures suggests the brand is either stalled or still in its very early pilot phase, presenting significant risk for prospective franchisees.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Fitness & Wellness | 1 |
$30K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$238K–$412K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Steep Me, LLC operates a nascent franchise system with only 2 total outlets and zero unit growth or closures in the past year, indicating a stalled or pre-growth phase. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy provides a clean legal slate, but ⚠ the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. With a total investment range of $237,683 to $412,100 and a 6% royalty, this is a moderately capital-intensive opportunity that carries significant uncertainty due to its minimal scale and opaque financial performance.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Education & Training | 1 |
$20K–$25K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$29K–$72K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
AAP Franchising, LLC operates a very small network of just 2 total outlets with no recent growth, as it opened and closed zero locations last year. The franchise fee is $20,000 with a low total investment range of $29,150 to $72,350, but the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ prevents any assessment of unit-level performance or profitability. There are no litigation or bankruptcy issues ✓, yet the stagnant footprint and lack of financial data raise concerns about the brand's viability and scalability. This is a high-risk opportunity for prospective franchisees given the minimal track record and opaque earnings potential.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| E | Business Services | 1 |
$50K
|
10.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$79K–$130K
|
2
+1
1F
/
1C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Enviromerica Franchise Management Company, LLC is a micro-scale operation with only 2 total outlets, making it a high-risk venture for prospective franchisees. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings provides a clean legal record, and the low total investment range of $78,700 to $129,900 is accessible. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. With just 1 outlet opened and 0 closed last year, the brand shows minimal growth, and the 10% royalty fee is relatively high for such a small, unproven system.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$30K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$398K–$683K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
MK Brands, LLC operates a very small system of just 2 total outlets with no recent growth, having opened and closed zero locations last year. The total investment range of $398,200 to $682,800 is substantial for a concept with no proven expansion trajectory. ✓ The franchise does provide Item 19 financial performance data, which is a positive for prospective franchisees, and there are no litigation or bankruptcy issues. ⚠ However, the high franchise fee of $30,000 and 6% royalty, combined with the stagnant unit count, present significant risk for a concept that has not demonstrated any recent scaling.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Fitness & Wellness | 1 |
$30K–$45K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$165K–$406K
|
2
+1
0F
/
2C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
$1.3M
|
$1.3M | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
B-Well Enterprises, LLC operates a very small, early-stage franchise system with only 2 total outlets, having added 1 net new location last year with zero closures. ✓ The franchise reports a strong average unit volume (AUV) of $1,288,699, which is a significant positive given the moderate total investment range of $165,331 to $406,331 and a $30,000 franchise fee. ⚠ However, the extreme lack of scale (2 units) presents substantial risk, as the financial performance data is based on a minuscule sample size and may not be replicable. ✓ There are no litigation or bankruptcy red flags, but prospective franchisees should weigh the high AUV against the unproven, nascent nature of the brand.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$40K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$431K–$969K
|
2
+1
1F
/
1C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 |
70%gm
|
19 | 1 month | ||
|
BV Franchise, LLC is a micro-scale operation with only 2 total outlets, making it a high-risk, unproven concept for prospective franchisees. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a clean slate, and the single outlet opened last year with no closures shows early stability. ⚠ However, the total investment range of $431,300 to $969,333 is substantial for such a nascent system, and the 5% royalty on top of a $40,000 franchise fee offers limited brand leverage. The positive Item 19 disclosure provides some financial transparency, but the tiny network size and high capital requirement demand extreme caution.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| I | Food & Beverage | 5 |
$80K
|
— |
$198K–$807K
|
2
+1
1F
/
1C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
I'Milky is a nascent franchise with only 2 total outlets and a single opening in the past year, indicating a very early-stage concept with minimal proof of operational stability. The total investment range of $197,500 to $807,000 is substantial for such a small network, and the $80,000 franchise fee is high relative to the brand's scale. ⚠ A significant red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial performance data, meaning prospective franchisees cannot evaluate any historical earnings potential. ✓ On the positive side, there is no litigation or bankruptcy history, and the brand has not experienced any closures, though this is likely due to its extremely limited footprint rather than proven resilience.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Food & Beverage | 3 |
$30K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$690K–$1.2M
|
2
+1
1F
/
1C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 20 | — | L | 1 month | ||
|
Shawarma Stackz LLC is a nascent franchise with only 2 total outlets and a very high entry cost, requiring a total investment between $690,000 and $1,225,000. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or validation of the brand's business model, which is a significant risk for prospective franchisees. ✓ The franchise has shown modest growth with 1 outlet opened and 0 closed in the last year, but ⚠ the presence of litigation is a notable red flag that warrants further investigation. Given the high capital requirement and lack of financial performance data, this opportunity carries substantial uncertainty for investors.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Retail | 2 |
$60K
|
6.0%
+0.5%ad
|
$269K–$384K
|
2
+1
2F
/
2C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
$2.2M
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
ConDecor Superstore is a nascent concept with only 2 total outlets, presenting a high-risk, unproven model for prospective franchisees. ✓ The single-unit opening last year with no closures and a strong reported average unit volume of $2.18 million are positive indicators, but the sample size is too small to be statistically reliable. ⚠ The total investment range of $269,100 to $383,700, combined with a $60,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty, is a significant capital commitment for a brand with virtually no operational track record. The absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a neutral factor, but the extreme lack of scale makes this a speculative investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| F | Health & Medical | 1 |
$29K–$39K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$250K–$689K
|
2
+3
0F
/
2C
|
+100.0%
+3
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 20 | — | L | 1 month | ||
|
FacialMania Franchising, LLC is a nascent franchise with only 2 total outlets, though it opened 3 last year with zero closures, suggesting early-stage growth. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant risk, as prospective franchisees cannot evaluate unit-level performance. ✓ The total investment range of $250,300 to $688,500 is moderate, but the $29,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty are standard. ⚠ The presence of litigation is a notable red flag that warrants further investigation before considering this opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| F | Senior Care | 22 |
$30K–$195K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$139K–$248K
|
2
+1
1F
/
1C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
$3.7M
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 |
100%gm
17%eb
|
19 | 1 month | ||
|
First Day Franchising, LLC operates a minuscule network of just 2 total outlets, having added only 1 new location last year with zero closures, indicating a nascent or highly controlled growth phase. ✓ The franchise reports a remarkably high average unit volume (AUV) of $3,728,515, which is a strong positive for revenue potential, though this figure is based on an extremely small sample size. ⚠ The total investment range of $138,780 to $248,080 is relatively low for the reported revenue, but the $30,000 franchise fee and 5.0% royalty are standard. With no litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary risk is the lack of proven scalability and the reliability of the financial performance representation from such a limited number of units.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$35K
|
6.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$220K–$274K
|
2
+1
0F
/
2C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
Axe Monkeys Franchising, LLC is a nascent concept with only 2 total outlets and a modest single-unit opening in the past year, indicating a very early-stage growth trajectory. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy provides a clean legal and financial starting point. ⚠ However, the total investment range of $219,850 to $274,000 is substantial for a brand with no proven multi-unit track record, and the 6% royalty fee adds ongoing cost pressure. Prospective franchisees should weigh the high entry cost against the limited operational history and small network scale.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| T | Retail | 1 |
$3K
|
2.5%
+1.0%ad
|
$55K–$132K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Teja Mart is a micro-scale franchise with only 2 total outlets and zero unit growth or closures in the past year, indicating a stagnant or pre-growth phase. The low franchise fee of $3,000 and 2.5% royalty are attractive, but the total investment range of $55,150 to $131,500 carries significant risk given the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure. ✓ Low entry costs and royalty fees are positives for cost-conscious investors. ⚠ The lack of any financial performance representation and zero recent expansion are major red flags, making it impossible to assess profitability or franchisee success.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| H | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$40K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$469K–$721K
|
2
+1
0F
/
2C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
HQ Matari, LLC presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity requiring $468,500 to $721,000, though the foundational financial terms are reasonable with a standard $40,000 franchise fee and a 5.0% royalty rate. ✓ The franchise demonstrates a clean historical record with no reported bankruptcy or litigation, and provides crucial financial transparency by including an Item 19 disclosure. ✓ However, the system is currently in an extremely early, micro-scale stage with only two total outlets nationwide. ⚠ While unit count grew by one outlet last year with zero closures, the overarching lack of historical scale poses a significant risk regarding long-term operational viability and brand validation. ⚠
|
||||||||||||||||||
| F | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$20K–$25K
|
6.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$218K–$491K
|
2
-3
1F
/
1C
|
-60.0%
-3
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 25 | — | L | 1 month | ||
|
FFH World Wide, LLC is a micro-scale franchise with only 2 total outlets, having opened zero and closed 3 in the last year, indicating a severe contraction. The total investment range of $217,500 to $490,500 is significant for such a small system, and the lack of Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any assessment of unit-level performance. ⚠ The presence of litigation is a notable red flag, and the net loss of outlets suggests operational or demand challenges. ✓ The absence of bankruptcy provides a minor positive, but the overall trajectory and transparency issues make this a high-risk opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$40K–$60K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$255K–$462K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
SMYA Ventures LLC operates a very small, nascent franchise system with only 2 total outlets and no unit growth or closures in the past year, indicating a stalled or pre-growth phase. The total investment range of $255,000 to $462,000 is significant for a brand with no Item 19 financial disclosure, creating a ⚠ high-risk scenario as prospective franchisees cannot verify unit-level profitability or revenue. The $40,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty are standard, but the complete absence of financial performance representations is a major red flag for a system this small. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history provides a clean legal slate, but the brand's inability to demonstrate any recent expansion or provide earnings data makes it a speculative investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Beauty & Personal Care | 1 |
$40K–$50K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$283K–$648K
|
2
+1
0F
/
2C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
$931K
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 |
21%eb
|
19 | 1 month | ||
|
Modern Halo Franchising, LLC is a nascent concept with only 2 total outlets, presenting significant risk despite a clean legal record with no litigation or bankruptcy. ✓ The franchise discloses a strong average unit volume (AUV) of $931,350, but this figure is based on a minuscule sample size, making it unreliable for projections. ⚠ The total investment range of $282,575 to $647,700 is substantial for a brand with no proven multi-unit track record, and the 6% royalty adds ongoing cost pressure. ✓ The opening of 1 outlet with 0 closures last year shows early positive momentum, but the lack of scale means prospective franchisees are essentially betting on an unproven system.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Senior Care | 1 |
$45K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$59K–$69K
|
2
2F
/
0C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Caring for People Services is a micro-scale franchise with only 2 total outlets and zero unit growth or closures in the past year, indicating a stagnant or pre-growth phase. The total investment range of $59,280 to $69,100 is low, but the $45,000 franchise fee represents a very high proportion of that total, which is a notable cost structure concern. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit economics or profitability, making it impossible to assess earnings potential. ✓ There are no litigation or bankruptcy issues, but the lack of any growth trajectory and financial transparency presents significant risk for prospective franchisees.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| D | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$30K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$162K–$270K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Dirt Franchise LLC operates a minimal network of just 2 total outlets with no recent openings or closures, indicating a stagnant or pre-growth phase. The franchise fee is $29,900 with a total investment range of $161,700 to $270,100, placing it in a moderate cost category. ⚠ A significant red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial performance disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without validated earnings data to assess profitability. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history provides some baseline stability, but the tiny scale and lack of growth momentum make this a high-risk, unproven opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Cleaning & Restoration | 1 |
$38K
|
10.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$159K–$245K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
$881K
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
Bare Metal Standard, Inc. operates a very small, two-unit franchise with no recent growth, having opened and closed zero outlets in the last year. ✓ The brand shows strong unit-level performance, with an average unit volume (AUV) of $880,883, and has no litigation or bankruptcy history. ⚠ However, the total investment range of $159,095 to $245,100 is significant for a concept with no proven scalability, and the 10% royalty is high relative to the brand's tiny footprint. This franchise offers a validated financial model but carries substantial risk due to its lack of expansion and minimal operational track record.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Home Services | 1 |
$40K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$80K–$200K
|
2
+1
0F
/
2C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
$2.1M
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
Slopepro operates a minuscule 2-unit system with a very high average unit volume of $2.05 million, suggesting a potentially lucrative but unproven model. The total investment range of $80,200 to $200,400 is low for the reported revenue, and the franchise has shown positive growth with one outlet opened and zero closures last year. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a clean bill of health, but ⚠ the extreme lack of scale (only 2 outlets) makes the financial disclosure statistically insignificant and the concept highly unproven for new franchisees.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Health & Medical | 2 |
$100K
|
8.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$189K–$256K
|
2
+1
1F
/
1C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
$749K
|
— | 100% | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
All States M.E.D. is a very small, early-stage franchise with only 2 total outlets, though it shows positive momentum with 1 net outlet added and zero closures last year. ✓ The franchise provides an Item 19 disclosure showing a strong average unit volume of $749,269, which is a significant positive given the relatively modest total investment range of $188,500 to $255,500. ⚠ However, the $100,000 franchise fee is notably high relative to the total investment, and the 8% royalty is steep for a concept with such limited operational history and scale. The absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a clean slate, but the tiny system size means prospective franchisees have very little data to validate the reported AUV or assess long-term viability.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| V | Food & Beverage | 8 |
$35K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$736K–$1.1M
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 20 | — | 19 L | 1 month | ||
|
Vicious Biscuit is a nascent concept with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth in the last year, indicating no current expansion momentum. The total investment range of $736,400 to $1,053,250 is substantial for such a small brand, presenting significant financial risk. ⚠ A notable red flag is the presence of litigation, which raises concerns about operational or franchisee relations. ✓ The franchise does provide an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering some transparency, but the high cost and lack of growth make this a high-risk opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| F | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$30K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$146K–$320K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
$439K
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
Frisson Espresso Franchise is a nascent concept with only 2 total outlets and zero net growth over the past year, indicating no expansion momentum. ✓ The franchise offers a relatively low total investment range of $145,600 to $319,500 and provides an Item 19 financial disclosure showing a strong average unit volume (AUV) of $438,677. ⚠ However, the extremely small scale and lack of any new openings or closures make the single AUV data point statistically unreliable for predicting future performance. The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a neutral positive, but the primary risk is the unproven, non-growing system.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| R | Fitness & Wellness | 2 |
$45K
|
7.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$207K–$338K
|
2
2F
/
0C
|
+0.0%
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
RX30 Fitness is a micro-gym franchise with a very limited footprint of just 2 total outlets and zero net growth in the last year, indicating no current expansion momentum. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy provides a clean legal and financial record, while the Item 19 disclosure offers transparency on unit economics. ⚠ However, the total investment range of $207,000 to $338,000 is relatively high for a nascent brand with no proven scalability, and the 7% royalty fee is standard but burdensome given the lack of operational history. This franchise presents a high-risk proposition for investors seeking a proven system, as the tiny scale and stagnant growth suggest significant execution uncertainty.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| L | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$13K–$35K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$116K–$719K
|
2
+1
0F
/
2C
|
+100.0%
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Lazy Lobster is a nascent franchise with only 2 total outlets and a modest 1-unit opening in the past year, indicating a very early-stage concept. ✓ The low $12,500 franchise fee and wide investment range of $116,250 to $718,500 offer some flexibility, but the absence of Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant ⚠ red flag, as it prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or performance. With no litigation or bankruptcies on record, the brand has a clean legal slate, but the lack of financial data makes it impossible to evaluate the business model's viability. This opportunity is best suited for risk-tolerant investors willing to operate without proven financial benchmarks.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$35K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$325K–$647K
|
2
0F
/
2C
|
+0.0%
|
$904K
|
— | — | 0/0/0 | 0.0% | 0 |
74%gm
17%eb
|
19 | 1 month | ||
|
Spiked Rich operates a very small system of just 2 outlets with no recent growth or closures, indicating a stagnant or nascent brand. ✓ The franchise discloses a strong average unit volume of $903,777, which is a positive sign for potential profitability, but the total investment range of $324,675 to $647,242 is substantial for such a limited network. ⚠ The lack of any new openings in the past year raises concerns about the brand's scalability and franchisee demand. With no litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary risk is the unproven nature of the concept at scale.
|
||||||||||||||||||