Companies

Flurry Fitness is currently a single-unit operation with a minimal $5,000 franchise fee, yet it requires a substantial total investment ranging from $231,100 to $476,600. ✓ The presence of an Item 19 disclosing a robust Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $475,518 suggests strong potential for return on investment relative to costs. ⚠ However, with zero net growth last year and only one total outlet, the concept remains an unproven, high-risk venture lacking operational scale.

The Halal Guys Franchise Inc. is in a nascent stage of development with only one total outlet, indicating a high-risk pilot phase despite the brand's established global reputation. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant drawback for prospective investors, especially given the wide total investment range of $231,600 to $834,000. ✓ However, the initial growth trajectory appears stable with two openings and zero closures last year, and the corporate structure is clean with no history of litigation or bankruptcy.

Buena Onda presents a compelling but solitary investment opportunity, characterized by an exceptionally high Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $1.6 million against a substantial entry cost of up to $883,500. ✓ The franchise demonstrates financial transparency and stability with no litigation or bankruptcy history, yet the total outlet count remains static at one with zero recent growth. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must weigh the strong economic performance against the significant capital requirement and the lack of an established operational footprint.

Vaura presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment reaching up to $1.28M, though this is tempered by a strong Average Unit Volume (AUV) of roughly $1.08M. ✓ The brand demonstrates financial transparency by providing an Item 19, yet ⚠ it currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero net growth last year. ⚠ Prospective investors must exercise caution regarding the single-unit footprint and the presence of litigation despite the robust revenue potential.

EVA presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity requiring nearly $1 million in liquidity, yet it offers a clean record with no litigation or bankruptcy history ✓. The lack of recent unit growth and a single operating outlet suggest the concept is currently unproven at scale ⚠. While the brand provides financial performance disclosures, the high total investment combined with a 5% royalty fee poses a significant risk given the absence of an established network.

RedKnight presents a low-barrier entry point with a modest total investment ($27,900 - $45,650) and a reasonable 4.0% royalty rate. ✓ However, the franchise currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, making it a de facto startup concept. ⚠ While the disclosed AUV of $170,556 is a positive data point, the lack of an established operational track record poses a significant risk for prospective franchisees.

Royal Filoncino LLC presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging up to $1.2M and a steep 8.0% royalty fee. ⚠ The concept currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, offering no proof of concept or network effect. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further complicates the investment thesis by preventing an assessment of potential ROI. This franchise represents a high-risk, early-stage venture that requires significant capital without the benefit of historical performance data.

JPD Franchising, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, having opened and closed zero outlets last year. ✓ The franchise presents a compelling value proposition with a moderate total investment ($137,600 - $244,000) and a strong Average Unit Volume ($631,730) relative to entry costs. ⚠ However, the lack of system-wide growth represents a significant risk, as the concept remains unproven in the hands of external franchisees.

LaserPrecision Marksmanship Club is currently a single-unit operation with no proven scale or franchise track record, presenting a high-risk profile for potential investors. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of the business model's profitability, while the $37,000 franchise fee is steep for a brand with zero recent growth. ⚠ With a total investment reaching up to $284,100 and a 6.0% royalty fee, the cost of entry is significant relative to the lack of operational history and support infrastructure.

Copier Consulting Franchising, LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with virtually no proof of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ✓ The franchise offers a low entry barrier with a total investment of $74.7k–$104.5k and provides financial transparency with an Average Unit Volume of $198,368. ⚠ However, the combination of a high 10% royalty fee and a lack of operational history presents a significant risk for prospective franchisees.

Mobius Franchising presents a puzzling investment profile characterized by an extreme lack of scale alongside a very high capital requirement of $1.6M to $3.8M. ✓ The franchise demonstrates strong unit-level economics with an AUV of roughly $1.6 million and a clean legal record, but ⚠ the existence of only one total outlet and zero recent growth makes it impossible to validate the replicability of the model. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face significant risk investing in a concept that effectively lacks an operational track record or proven system.

Smash Zone, LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year, indicating an unproven business model. ⚠ A significant red flag is the executive team's history of bankruptcy, which is particularly concerning given the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation. ✓ The total investment is relatively accessible at $60k–$73k, though the $31,000 franchise fee constitutes a heavy percentage of the initial capital at risk.

Gorilla Franchising USA, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a nascent concept with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, making it difficult to validate the business model. ✓ The franchise offers a compelling Average Unit Volume ($313,405) relative to the low initial investment ($100k+), and maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the lack of an operational track record and minimal scale suggest this is an unproven opportunity suited only for risk-tolerant investors.

Another Nine, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with a minimal growth trajectory, having opened zero net new locations beyond its sole existing outlet. The franchise presents a significant financial risk with a high initial investment reaching up to $397,350 and a steep 6.5% royalty fee, yet it fails to provide an Item 19 financial performance representation to substantiate these costs. While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a ✓, the absence of scale and verified earnings data makes this a highly speculative opportunity.

Karak House Franchising Company LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with only one total outlet, making it a high-risk venture despite a clean legal record with no litigation or bankruptcy ✓. The franchise offers solid financial transparency through an Item 19, but the total investment of $260,800 to $408,700 is significant relative to the lack of operational history ⚠. With zero net growth last year, potential investors should be cautious of an unproven model that lacks the validation of a multi-unit track record.

Cupcake Heaven is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, making it a startup concept rather than an established franchise system. ✓ The franchise offers a low entry fee of $10,000 and reasonable royalty rates, though the total investment varies significantly from $68,600 to $189,450. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a major red flag, as it prevents prospective investors from validating the economic viability of the model. ⚠ With zero growth last year and only one operating location, the franchise carries high risks regarding sustainability and proven performance.

Red Light Method presents a high-risk profile as a single-unit operation with zero recent growth, indicating the concept is currently unproven at scale. ✓ The franchise offers financial transparency through an Item 19 disclosure and maintains a clean legal record, while the estimated total investment of $276,675 to $614,175 is moderate for the sector. ⚠ However, the lack of an established network and a $40,000 franchise fee suggest franchisees would be early adopters assuming significant operational risk.

Sparkle presents a high-cost investment opportunity requiring a total commitment of up to $445,250, yet it currently lacks the operational scale to justify the risk, operating as a single-unit system. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean legal record with no history of bankruptcy or litigation, and the opening of its first outlet suggests an early-stage launch rather than a decline. ⚠ However, the combination of a high $39,000 franchise fee and a 7.0% royalty rate appears aggressive for a concept with absolutely no proven track record or network momentum. This opportunity represents a high-risk, seed-stage investment lacking the validation typically required for such a premium entry cost.

I and S FR LLC is currently a single-unit operation with a minimal growth trajectory, having opened and closed zero outlets last year. ✓ The franchise demonstrates strong unit-level economics with an Average Unit Volume of $873,726 against a mid-range total investment of $262,300 - $395,350. ⚠ However, the lack of scale presents a significant risk, as the system consists of only one outlet, offering limited proof of replicability despite a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy.

ScoliCare presents a compelling value proposition characterized by robust unit economics, with an Average Unit Volume of $1,144,498 that significantly outweighs the mid-range total investment. ✓ Despite the strong financial potential and a clean legal record, the concept is currently in a nascent stage with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must exercise caution regarding the $49,000 franchise fee, as the lack of an established operational footprint makes this an unproven system without a demonstrated trajectory of scale. ⚠

Satellite Teams presents a compelling but unproven value proposition, featuring an exceptionally high Average Unit Volume of $3.5 million against a low total investment of roughly $76k to $96k. ✓ The franchise offers a highly accessible entry point for a concept of this magnitude, with no history of litigation or bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the system currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, making the financial performance claims difficult to benchmark. ⚠ Prospective investors must exercise caution as the high royalty fee of 10% applies to a system that has not yet demonstrated replicable success.

Stain & Seal Experts is a nascent franchise system with a single outlet and zero new locations opened last year, indicating a lack of current growth momentum and operational scale. The investment range of $89,050 to $116,350 is relatively accessible, but the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation removes critical data needed to validate unit-level economics. While the clean legal history is a positive, the 6% royalty combined with the lack of a proven track record presents a high-risk profile for potential franchisees.

Capital Laser Franchise, LLC presents a compelling value proposition driven by an exceptionally high Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $1,460,366, though it currently lacks proof of scalability with only one total outlet. ✓ The business model demonstrates strong unit economics and clean leadership history with no litigation or bankruptcy, but the wide total investment range of $113,750 to $681,250 suggests significant variance in facility requirements. ⚠ Investors must exercise caution regarding the system's maturity, as the complete absence of recent openings indicates the concept remains unproven beyond the pilot stage.

Krystal Klean presents a high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale with only one total outlet and zero net growth last year. ⚠ The franchise imposes a steep 8.5% royalty fee and a significant total investment of up to $435,375, which demands high revenue to achieve profitability. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure removes any ability to validate the potential return on this substantial capital outlay.

Bubba’s Famous Ice Cream presents a high-risk profile due to its total lack of scale, operating as a single-unit concept with zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial ($435k–$590k) for an unproven model that offers no Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean legal record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, though the absence of an established network is a major strategic concern.

Strive 11 International, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a concept still in its infancy, operating with only a single total outlet and recording zero growth over the last year. ✓ The franchise offers a low barrier to entry with a modest total investment ($150,500 - $250,000) and reports a strong Average Unit Volume ($402,511) in its Item 19. ⚠ However, the lack of an established network makes it difficult to validate the system's scalability or the reliability of these financial performance claims. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should treat this as an unproven startup venture rather than a stable franchise system.

Gai Kitchen Franchise, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, presenting a high-risk profile typical of an unproven startup concept. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from validating the business model’s profitability against the $122,500 to $292,000 initial investment. ⚠ With zero outlet growth last year, the concept lacks market traction, making it a speculative venture rather than a proven expansion opportunity.

Pod Plug Franchising, LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with virtually no proof of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The primary red flag is the disconnect between the low Average Unit Volume ($13,953) and the high royalty rate (8.0%), suggesting unit economics may be difficult to sustain. ✓ While the initial investment ($52k-$106k) is relatively accessible and the record is clean of litigation or bankruptcy, the lack of operational history makes this a high-risk venture.

Dog of All Trades, LLC presents an extremely limited operational history with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, making it a de facto startup despite offering franchises. ✓ The investment range of $79,700 - $198,800 is relatively accessible, and the 3.0% royalty rate is competitive for the sector. ⚠ However, the lack of scale represents a significant risk, as the system lacks proof of concept and replicable success metrics. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution, as purchasing this concept is essentially funding a startup experiment rather than joining an established network.

Portal Franchising LLC exhibits a critical lack of scale with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, suggesting the concept is unproven despite a high franchise fee of $85,000. ✓ The presence of an Item 19 disclosing an AUV of $860,252 offers a performance benchmark, and the lack of litigation or bankruptcy provides basic legal stability. ⚠ However, the total investment ranges widely from $386,250 to $2.86 million, creating significant financial risk for a franchise system that has not yet demonstrated an ability to expand.

Complete Mobile Drug Testing Franchise LLC is currently a high-risk proposition due to its minimal scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise fee of $50,000 and ongoing 10.0% royalty are steep relative to the lack of an established network or proven track record of success. ✓ While the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive note, the limited operational data makes the $72,350 - $123,150 investment difficult to justify compared to competitors with broader footprints.

Juiced Fuel Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of scale, operating as a concept with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ While the franchise benefits from a clean legal history and a low entry point of $92,700 - $132,000, the $59,500 franchise fee constitutes a heavy percentage of the total investment for an unproven system. ✓ The presence of an Item 19 disclosing an AUV of $386,752 offers a baseline for unit economics, but the absence of a stated royalty structure is unusual and warrants scrutiny.

The Carpet Chemist Franchising LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment of $82.3k-$120.7k and a healthy Item 19 disclosure showing an AUV of $283,000 ✓. However, the system currently consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating the concept is unproven at scale ⚠. Additionally, prospective franchisees should note that the 8.0% royalty fee is relatively high for the cleaning industry, which could impact margins despite the strong revenue potential.

The Grace Galleries IFG, Inc. presents a questionable investment profile due to a complete lack of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ✓ The franchise offers a low entry barrier with a total investment of $91k–$145.7k and a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents verification of profitability, and the 10% royalty rate is steep for a system with no proven track record or momentum.

Service Star Painters currently lacks any operational scale with zero total outlets and no growth recorded last year, making it a de facto startup concept despite its franchise status. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of the business model's profitability, representing a significant risk for prospective investors. While the entry cost is relatively low, the 8.0% royalty fee is high for a new system, and the lack of an established track record makes this a high-risk venture.

INLIFE WELLNESS USA, LLC presents a high-barrier investment opportunity with a total cost ranging from $206,847 to $335,170, though the franchise offers a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓. The most critical red flag is the reported royalty rate of 2900%, which is likely a data error but requires immediate verification ⚠. Additionally, the system currently has zero total outlets and recorded no growth last year, indicating an unproven and potentially risky business trajectory ⚠.

Iris Galerie Franchising LLC currently exhibits zero operational scale with 0 total outlets and no growth recorded last year. ⚠ The 45.0% royalty rate is exceptionally high and will significantly pressure unit economics, despite a moderate total investment range of $113,000 to $395,000. ✓ The franchise offers financial transparency through an Item 19 disclosure and maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, though the lack of an established network remains a major risk.

Milkshop Japan Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a startup concept with zero operational outlets and no track record of successful openings. ⚠ The franchise requires a substantial initial investment of up to $951,200 and charges ongoing royalties, yet fails to provide an Item 19 financial disclosure to substantiate potential returns. ⚠ With no units opened or closed in the last year, the system lacks scale and validation, making it a speculative venture suited only for risk-tolerant investors.

Sugar Llamas Enterprises presents a high-risk opportunity as a pre-revenue concept with zero total outlets and no established operating history. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it impossible to validate potential returns against the significant $252,400 to $368,200 initial investment. ⚠ With no units opened or closed last year, the franchise lacks proof of concept and market traction. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy offers minor administrative reassurance, but the financial viability of the model remains entirely unproven.

W&M Franchising USA Ltd. presents an exceptionally high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $2.4M to nearly $4M, combined with a steep 8.5% royalty fee. ⚠ The complete absence of operating outlets and a lack of Item 19 financial performance data represent significant risks for potential investors. ⚠ With zero growth trajectory and no established unit base, this concept lacks the validation typically required to justify such a substantial capital outlay.

Stain Erasers, LLC exhibits a critical lack of scale with zero total outlets and no growth trajectory, suggesting the franchise system is currently dormant or inactive. ⚠ The franchise imposes a steep entry barrier with a $75,000 fee and 7.0% royalty rate, which appears misaligned with the system's lack of operational presence. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further complicates the investment thesis by preventing an assessment of potential returns. ⚠ With no active units and high initial costs, this opportunity carries significant market risk and lacks validation.

Murphy Ice Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk opportunity as a concept with zero total outlets and no operational track record. ⚠ The wide total investment range of $222,000 to $2.2 million indicates significant variability in real estate and equipment needs, while the absence of any opened or closed units confirms the brand is still in the launch phase. ✓ The franchise offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy and provides an Item 19 financial disclosure, suggesting transparency despite the lack of scale. Potential investors should be aware that this is an unproven model requiring substantial capital commitment without the validation of existing successful operators.

Everyday Care Franchise, LLC presents a high-risk profile characterized by a complete lack of operational scale, with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the last year. ⚠ The franchise fee of $49,500 appears disproportionately high relative to the total investment of $53,347 - $56,697, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure removes any visibility into potential unit economics. ⚠ With no proven track record, no royalty structure listed, and no active franchisees, this concept remains entirely unproven in the market.

Cloudbound Franchise Group, LLC represents a high-risk, pre-revenue opportunity requiring a substantial capital outlay of $1.8M to $3.6M despite having zero operational outlets. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance representations and a $60,000 franchise fee for an unproven concept signals significant execution risk for early adopters. While the lack of litigation and bankruptcy is a standard baseline for a new entity, the 0% royalty structure suggests the business model is likely untested. ⚠ This is a speculative venture suitable only for investors capable of absorbing total capital loss without established brand validation.

Registry Collection Hotels presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity with a total cost ranging from roughly $1 million to over $47 million ✓. The franchise carries significant risk due to a total lack of operational scale with zero open outlets and the absence of financial performance data in the Item 19 disclosure ⚠. Additionally, the presence of recent litigation creates a cautionary environment for prospective franchisees evaluating this unproven system ⚠.

The Fashion Class Franchise LLC presents a concept with a moderate initial investment range of $114,900 to $194,800, though it currently lacks any operational scale with zero total outlets. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history offers a clean legal baseline, but the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure removes visibility into potential unit economics. ⚠ With zero outlets opened last year and no proven footprint, this represents a ground-floor opportunity lacking the validation of a tested franchise system. ⚠

The Pickle Pad™ presents a high-risk opportunity as a pre-revenue concept with zero open outlets and a substantial total investment ranging from $1.37M to $2.03M. ⚠ Significant red flags include a historical bankruptcy filing and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, which leaves potential returns entirely unverified. ⚠ With no established scale or unit growth to date, prospective franchisees face considerable uncertainty regarding the viability of this expensive startup model.

Clearview Franchising, Inc. presents a low barrier to entry with a $10,000 franchise fee and a total investment starting at $14,900 ✓. However, the absence of any operating outlets and the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation make it impossible to validate the business model ⚠. Additionally, the 20.0% royalty fee is exceptionally high for a startup concept with no proven track record, posing a significant risk to ROI ⚠.

Clintar Outdoor Commercial Services presents a low-risk historical profile with no litigation, bankruptcy, or recent unit closures, while the provision of an Item 19 offers financial transparency. ✓ However, the system currently lacks scale with zero total outlets and zero recent growth, raising concerns about operational momentum and brand presence. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must weigh the accessible $19,950 franchise fee against a broad total investment range ($52k-$273k) and the challenge of launching into a dormant network. ⚠