Companies

JFC Franchise is currently a high-risk, early-stage concept with only one total outlet, offering no statistical proof of a replicable business model. ⚠ The $100,000 franchise fee is aggressive for a startup with no Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving investors with no data to validate potential returns. ✓ While the investment range of $113,000 to $351,000 is relatively accessible and the single unit remained open, the lack of scale and transparency makes this a speculative venture.

Lime House Franchise, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a nascent concept with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, removing critical data needed to validate the potential return on a substantial investment ranging from $348k to $781k. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive administrative note, but the single-unit scale suggests the system is unproven and lacks operational maturity.

Pixiu Malahongtang presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $303,500 to $548,000, yet it currently lacks the operational scale to justify the cost or risk. ⚠ The network consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, offering no proof of replicability or market traction. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential returns for prospective franchisees.

Holt Computer Training currently operates as a single-unit system with no recent growth, indicating it is either a new concept or stagnant. ⚠ The franchise presents significant red flags for investors, including a historical bankruptcy and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation. ⚠ With a total investment ranging up to $420,000 and 6.0% royalties, the financial risk is high given the lack of proven scale or transparency.

ScoliCare presents a compelling value proposition characterized by robust unit economics, with an Average Unit Volume of $1,144,498 that significantly outweighs the mid-range total investment. ✓ Despite the strong financial potential and a clean legal record, the concept is currently in a nascent stage with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must exercise caution regarding the $49,000 franchise fee, as the lack of an established operational footprint makes this an unproven system without a demonstrated trajectory of scale. ⚠

Red Light Method presents a high-risk profile as a single-unit operation with zero recent growth, indicating the concept is currently unproven at scale. ✓ The franchise offers financial transparency through an Item 19 disclosure and maintains a clean legal record, while the estimated total investment of $276,675 to $614,175 is moderate for the sector. ⚠ However, the lack of an established network and a $40,000 franchise fee suggest franchisees would be early adopters assuming significant operational risk.

Sparkle presents a high-cost investment opportunity requiring a total commitment of up to $445,250, yet it currently lacks the operational scale to justify the risk, operating as a single-unit system. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean legal record with no history of bankruptcy or litigation, and the opening of its first outlet suggests an early-stage launch rather than a decline. ⚠ However, the combination of a high $39,000 franchise fee and a 7.0% royalty rate appears aggressive for a concept with absolutely no proven track record or network momentum. This opportunity represents a high-risk, seed-stage investment lacking the validation typically required for such a premium entry cost.

Capital Laser Franchise, LLC presents a compelling value proposition driven by an exceptionally high Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $1,460,366, though it currently lacks proof of scalability with only one total outlet. ✓ The business model demonstrates strong unit economics and clean leadership history with no litigation or bankruptcy, but the wide total investment range of $113,750 to $681,250 suggests significant variance in facility requirements. ⚠ Investors must exercise caution regarding the system's maturity, as the complete absence of recent openings indicates the concept remains unproven beyond the pilot stage.

Missquito presents a high-risk profile characterized by a complete lack of scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ The combination of a $49,500 franchise fee, a high 10% royalty rate, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure makes it difficult to validate the business model or potential return on investment. ⚠ The presence of active litigation further compounds the risk for prospective franchisees considering this brand.

BP Smokehouse Franchising, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with effectively no franchise track record, presenting a high-risk profile despite a clean legal history with no litigation or bankruptcy ✓. The brand requires a significant capital commitment, with a total investment reaching up to $713,600, yet justifies this cost with a solid Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $685,755 ✓. However, the complete lack of franchise growth last year indicates the concept is unproven at scale ⚠.

Copier Consulting Franchising, LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with virtually no proof of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ✓ The franchise offers a low entry barrier with a total investment of $74.7k–$104.5k and provides financial transparency with an Average Unit Volume of $198,368. ⚠ However, the combination of a high 10% royalty fee and a lack of operational history presents a significant risk for prospective franchisees.

Cornhole Golf, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with a nascent growth trajectory, having opened its first and only outlet last year. ✓ The franchise offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy and provides financial performance data in Item 19 to support the business model. ⚠ However, the concept is unproven at scale, and franchisees face a wide total investment range of $212,000 to $803,000 coupled with a somewhat premium 7.0% royalty fee for a brand new system.

Dog of All Trades, LLC presents an extremely limited operational history with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, making it a de facto startup despite offering franchises. ✓ The investment range of $79,700 - $198,800 is relatively accessible, and the 3.0% royalty rate is competitive for the sector. ⚠ However, the lack of scale represents a significant risk, as the system lacks proof of concept and replicable success metrics. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution, as purchasing this concept is essentially funding a startup experiment rather than joining an established network.

Fuelify Franchising LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal market validation, presenting a high risk for prospective franchisees despite the absence of litigation or bankruptcy. ✓ The low total investment entry point of $82,500 to $127,000 is attractive, though the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes potential returns difficult to quantify. ⚠ With zero outlets opened last year and only one total location, the system lacks a proven growth trajectory or economies of scale.

Goldsainte Franchise, LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with only one total outlet, offering a low entry point of $177,500 to $320,000. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive initial indicator, but the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of unit economics. ⚠ A royalty rate of 11.0% is aggressive for a new brand, and the single-unit footprint offers no track record of scalability or sustained performance.

JPD Franchising, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, having opened and closed zero outlets last year. ✓ The franchise presents a compelling value proposition with a moderate total investment ($137,600 - $244,000) and a strong Average Unit Volume ($631,730) relative to entry costs. ⚠ However, the lack of system-wide growth represents a significant risk, as the concept remains unproven in the hands of external franchisees.

Mobius Franchising presents a puzzling investment profile characterized by an extreme lack of scale alongside a very high capital requirement of $1.6M to $3.8M. ✓ The franchise demonstrates strong unit-level economics with an AUV of roughly $1.6 million and a clean legal record, but ⚠ the existence of only one total outlet and zero recent growth makes it impossible to validate the replicability of the model. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face significant risk investing in a concept that effectively lacks an operational track record or proven system.

RBO Agency & Advisory, Inc. is currently a single-unit operation with no franchise validation, making it a de facto startup opportunity rather than an established brand. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure combined with a total investment of up to $260,369 presents a high-risk profile for potential investors. ⚠ With zero outlets opened or closed last year, the system shows no tangible growth trajectory or proof of concept.

Smash Zone, LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year, indicating an unproven business model. ⚠ A significant red flag is the executive team's history of bankruptcy, which is particularly concerning given the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation. ✓ The total investment is relatively accessible at $60k–$73k, though the $31,000 franchise fee constitutes a heavy percentage of the initial capital at risk.

Strive 11 International, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a concept still in its infancy, operating with only a single total outlet and recording zero growth over the last year. ✓ The franchise offers a low barrier to entry with a modest total investment ($150,500 - $250,000) and reports a strong Average Unit Volume ($402,511) in its Item 19. ⚠ However, the lack of an established network makes it difficult to validate the system's scalability or the reliability of these financial performance claims. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should treat this as an unproven startup venture rather than a stable franchise system.

Pod Plug Franchising, LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with virtually no proof of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The primary red flag is the disconnect between the low Average Unit Volume ($13,953) and the high royalty rate (8.0%), suggesting unit economics may be difficult to sustain. ✓ While the initial investment ($52k-$106k) is relatively accessible and the record is clean of litigation or bankruptcy, the lack of operational history makes this a high-risk venture.

Portal Franchising LLC exhibits a critical lack of scale with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, suggesting the concept is unproven despite a high franchise fee of $85,000. ✓ The presence of an Item 19 disclosing an AUV of $860,252 offers a performance benchmark, and the lack of litigation or bankruptcy provides basic legal stability. ⚠ However, the total investment ranges widely from $386,250 to $2.86 million, creating significant financial risk for a franchise system that has not yet demonstrated an ability to expand.

Complete Mobile Drug Testing Franchise LLC is currently a high-risk proposition due to its minimal scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise fee of $50,000 and ongoing 10.0% royalty are steep relative to the lack of an established network or proven track record of success. ✓ While the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive note, the limited operational data makes the $72,350 - $123,150 investment difficult to justify compared to competitors with broader footprints.

Juiced Fuel Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of scale, operating as a concept with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ While the franchise benefits from a clean legal history and a low entry point of $92,700 - $132,000, the $59,500 franchise fee constitutes a heavy percentage of the total investment for an unproven system. ✓ The presence of an Item 19 disclosing an AUV of $386,752 offers a baseline for unit economics, but the absence of a stated royalty structure is unusual and warrants scrutiny.

The Carpet Chemist Franchising LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment of $82.3k-$120.7k and a healthy Item 19 disclosure showing an AUV of $283,000 ✓. However, the system currently consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating the concept is unproven at scale ⚠. Additionally, prospective franchisees should note that the 8.0% royalty fee is relatively high for the cleaning industry, which could impact margins despite the strong revenue potential.

The Grace Galleries IFG, Inc. presents a questionable investment profile due to a complete lack of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ✓ The franchise offers a low entry barrier with a total investment of $91k–$145.7k and a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents verification of profitability, and the 10% royalty rate is steep for a system with no proven track record or momentum.

Southern Solar Franchise Systems offers a high-reward opportunity with an exceptional Average Unit Volume of $3.88M, though this performance is based on a single corporate outlet rather than a diversified network of franchisees. ✓ The financial transparency provided in Item 19 and the absence of litigation or bankruptcy are strong positives for the brand's stability. ⚠ However, the lack of new outlet openings last year indicates stagnant growth, making the $65,000 franchise fee a risky investment for a system with no current franchise expansion.

Tohc Franchising is an extremely early-stage concept with virtually no scale, having launched only one total outlet in the last year. ✓ The franchise offers a verified financial performance representation (Item 19) and a clean litigation history, but ⚠ a disclosed bankruptcy history poses a significant risk to system stability. ⚠ With a total investment ranging up to nearly $700k, this opportunity presents a high-risk profile typical of unproven startup franchises.

The White Bounce House is currently a single-unit operation with no proven scale or franchise track record. ✓ The low franchise fee of $15,000 and total investment between $40,750 and $108,250 offer an accessible entry point for entrepreneurs. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure combined with a high 8.0% royalty fee presents a significant risk regarding potential return on investment. ⚠ With zero outlets opened or closed last year, the concept remains untested as a scalable franchise model.

The Local Fry presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $449,000 to $703,000, yet it lacks the operational validation of a proven chain. ⚠ With only one total outlet and zero growth last year, the concept remains unproven at scale, offering no track record of replication. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further complicates the investment thesis, as potential franchisees cannot verify profitability metrics against the significant upfront capital required.

The Look Salon Suites presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity requiring a total spend of up to $1.05 million, positioning it in the premium segment of the beauty real estate market. ✓ The provision of an Item 19 financial disclosure and a clean legal record regarding litigation and bankruptcy offer transparency and stability for potential investors. ⚠ However, the concept currently lacks proof of scale or market traction, operating as a single unit with zero growth over the last year. ⚠ Consequently, this franchise carries significant execution risk typical of an unproven startup despite its substantial capital requirements.

The Cookie Corner presents a compelling but solitary investment case, operating a single unit that generates an impressive AUV of $3.3 million ✓. While the concept is financially efficient with no current litigation or bankruptcy issues ✓, the lack of new outlets opened last year suggests the franchise is currently stagnant ⚠. Prospective franchisees must also weigh the high entry barrier of up to $1.4 million against the risk of partnering with a system that has yet to demonstrate scalability ⚠.

Bright Brothers Group presents a high-risk profile as a startup concept with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, making it an unproven venture rather than an established system. ✓ The franchise offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy and provides financial transparency via an Item 19, while the total investment of $170k-$349k is relatively accessible. ⚠ However, the combination of a $45,000 franchise fee and a 6.5% royalty is aggressive for a brand with no scale or operating history to validate the model.

Crust Franchisingoration is an extremely high-risk proposition characterized by a total lack of scale with only one corporate outlet currently operating. ⚠ The investment requirement is steep ($662k–$930k) for an unproven concept that lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, meaning potential returns remain completely unverified. ⚠ With zero growth last year and no franchisee footprint, this concept offers no track record of success or stability.

Scoop Brothers is currently a single-unit operation with no growth trajectory, having opened and closed zero outlets last year. ✓ The franchise offers a low total investment entry point ($132,500 - $197,000) and reports a solid Average Unit Volume of $352,738 with a clean legal record. ⚠ However, the lack of scale presents a significant risk, as the system lacks proven replication data, and the 7.5% royalty fee is aggressive for a concept with minimal operational history.

Therannu is a nascent franchise system consisting of a single outlet with zero new locations opened last year, indicating a lack of current growth momentum and proven scalability. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive sign, the high initial investment of nearly $400k to $635k represents a significant risk for an unproven concept. The brand offers transparency through an Item 19 disclosure showing an AUV of $712,438, yet potential franchisees should approach with caution due to the limited operating history and lack of expansion.

Elder-Well presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of scale, operating as a single-unit concept with zero growth in the last year. ✓ The franchise offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy and provides financial transparency in Item 19. ⚠ However, the single operating outlet makes it difficult to validate the $48,500 franchise fee against proven replicability. ⚠ Investors face a high-risk scenario entering a concept with no established trajectory or operational history.

The Swing Bays presents a compelling financial profile with an Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $938,669, which significantly exceeds the high-end total investment estimate of $924,000 ✓. However, the concept faces critical scalability concerns as it currently operates as a single unit with zero new openings last year ⚠. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive indicator, the lack of a proven multi-unit track record makes this a high-risk proposition despite the strong unit economics.

HOCCO The Indian Kitchen is an extremely early-stage concept with virtually no scale, operating only a single unit and opening just one location last year. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, but ⚠ the investment range of $401,500 to $985,000 is substantial for an unproven brand. ⚠ A critical risk for investors is the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, meaning there is no data to validate potential profitability or ROI.

This franchise presents a compelling but unproven investment opportunity, characterized by an exceptionally strong Average Unit Volume of $1,085,819 ✓. However, the concept is currently a single-unit operation with zero recent growth, meaning it lacks the historical scale to validate replicability ⚠. Prospective franchisees must also weigh the high total investment against the risks of buying into a nascent brand with no existing franchise track record.

This franchise presents a high-risk opportunity due to its minimal scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement of $250,100 to $428,500 is steep relative to the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering no data to validate potential returns. ⚠ While the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive administrative note, the 6.0% royalty fee adds to the cost of a system that currently lacks a proven track record.

Jamin Franchise, LLC is currently a micro-scale operation with only one total outlet, indicating an unproven and highly risky business model despite the clean legal record ✓. While the entry point is accessible with a franchise fee of $32,500 and the single unit reports a solid AUV of $413,732, the total investment range of $116k-$431k is steep for a system with zero growth momentum ⚠. The complete lack of new openings suggests the concept is stagnant or struggling to validate its replication strategy, making it a speculative venture rather than a secure investment.

1-800-STRIPER presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $182k to $305k, though the risk is somewhat offset by a solid Average Unit Volume of $635,207. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, but the 7.0% royalty fee is a significant ongoing cost that requires high operational efficiency. ⚠ The most critical concern is the total lack of scale and momentum, as the system consists of only one total outlet and recorded zero growth last year. ⚠ Prospective buyers should treat this as an unproven, startup-level concept despite the availability of financial performance data.

Vincent's Clam Bar presents a compelling but singular financial profile, boasting an exceptional Average Unit Volume (AUV) of over $10.4 million against a high total investment of $1.6M to $2.2M. ✓ The brand maintains a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy, though the lack of any new outlets opened last year suggests a static growth trajectory. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must weigh the proven, high-volume profitability against the risks of a concept currently limited to a single corporate location.

Binghamton HOTS presents an extremely limited scale with a total of one outlet and zero recent growth, signaling a lack of established franchise traction despite a low entry fee of $20,000. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy provides a clean background, and the availability of financial performance data (Item 19) offers necessary transparency regarding potential returns. ⚠ However, the total investment of up to $253,075 carries significant risk given the system's stagnation and total reliance on a single operating location.

Advantage College Planning presents a high-margin opportunity with an Average Unit Volume of $580,957 against a mid-range total investment of $72k-$102k. ✓ However, the concept currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, making it a de facto startup risk despite offering financial performance disclosures. ⚠ Prospective buyers must weigh the strong revenue potential against the absence of an established operational track record or network validation.

GH Builders NY is currently a single-unit operation, indicating it is either a startup or a new franchise system with a minimal track record of scale. While the franchise benefits from a clean history regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ prevents prospective investors from validating potential earnings. Additionally, the $54,000 franchise fee is aggressive for a new brand ⚠, representing a high entry cost relative to the system's limited operational history and support infrastructure.

Grieb Carwash currently lacks scale with a single operating outlet and zero recent growth, signaling an unproven franchise model. ⚠ The financial barriers are exceptionally high, requiring a total investment of up to $3.3 million alongside a steep 8.0% royalty fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further complicates the value proposition, offering investors no data to validate potential returns against the significant capital risk.

EzLane Auto Auctions presents a high-barrier entry point with a steep $75,000 franchise fee and a 15.0% royalty rate, which significantly impacts unit economics. ⚠ The concept currently lacks proof of scale, operating with only one total outlet and recording zero growth last year. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy provides a clean background, but the lack of an established network makes this a high-risk venture dependent on an unproven model.