Companies

Broadway Hot & Honey Chicken presents a compelling but unproven financial model, boasting an impressive AUV of $2.2 million against a mid-range total investment of $340k-$671k. ✓ The concept features a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy, suggesting stable management. ⚠ However, with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, the franchise lacks the operational scale to validate system-wide replicability. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face a high-risk proposition buying into a single-unit operation with no track record of network expansion.

Jungle Driving School presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of scale, operating as a single-unit concept with zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise requires a significant total investment of up to $313,294, yet reports a low Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $290,728, suggesting a slow path to profitability given the 7.0% royalty fee. ✓ The presence of an Item 19 financial disclosure provides some transparency, but the combination of active litigation and a solitary outlet makes this an unproven venture.

Nomoo presents a compelling value proposition with an impressive Average Unit Volume of $1,398,241, suggesting strong unit-level economics despite the mid-to-high tier total investment of $328,000 to $732,500. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, though the 6.0% royalty fee is standard for the industry. ⚠ However, the concept is currently unproven at scale with only one total outlet in operation, making this a ground-floor opportunity with significant execution risk. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must rely entirely on the performance of the single prototype when evaluating the system’s replicability.

dClutterfly presents a compelling unit-level economic model with an Average Unit Volume of $940,081, offering a high potential return on investment relative to the low entry cost of $64k–$226k. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, and the 6.0% royalty fee appears sustainable given the strong revenue figures. ⚠ However, the concept is currently unproven at scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, representing a significant risk for early adopters. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must weigh the attractive financial performance against the lack of operational history and a nonexistent track record of replication.

Buena Onda presents a compelling but solitary investment opportunity, characterized by an exceptionally high Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $1.6 million against a substantial entry cost of up to $883,500. ✓ The franchise demonstrates financial transparency and stability with no litigation or bankruptcy history, yet the total outlet count remains static at one with zero recent growth. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must weigh the strong economic performance against the significant capital requirement and the lack of an established operational footprint.

Take it Off! Spa is an extremely early-stage or unproven concept with a single operating outlet and zero growth last year, signaling a lack of market traction. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating the business model’s profitability, which is a significant risk given the startup nature of the brand. While the entry cost of $109,900 to $250,500 is relatively moderate, the $39,000 franchise fee is high relative to the limited support and infrastructure likely available.

Gai Kitchen Franchise, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, presenting a high-risk profile typical of an unproven startup concept. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from validating the business model’s profitability against the $122,500 to $292,000 initial investment. ⚠ With zero outlet growth last year, the concept lacks market traction, making it a speculative venture rather than a proven expansion opportunity.

Bubba’s Famous Ice Cream presents a high-risk profile due to its total lack of scale, operating as a single-unit concept with zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial ($435k–$590k) for an unproven model that offers no Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean legal record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, though the absence of an established network is a major strategic concern.

Stain & Seal Experts is a nascent franchise system with a single outlet and zero new locations opened last year, indicating a lack of current growth momentum and operational scale. The investment range of $89,050 to $116,350 is relatively accessible, but the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation removes critical data needed to validate unit-level economics. While the clean legal history is a positive, the 6% royalty combined with the lack of a proven track record presents a high-risk profile for potential franchisees.

2 Hours of Freedom presents a high-risk profile due to its status as a concept with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial ($452k - $858k), yet the single unit's Annual Unit Volume of $686,017 suggests tight margins relative to the entry cost. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive note, but the lack of an established footprint makes viability difficult to assess.

This franchise represents a high-risk opportunity given it currently operates as a standalone unit with no proven scale or network effect. ⚠ The investment range of $325,300 to $821,500 is substantial for an unproven concept, particularly combined with a $40,000 franchise fee and 6.0% royalty. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of unit economics, making it difficult to justify the capital requirement. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy offers basic operational stability, but the total reliance on a single model is a critical red flag for potential franchisees.

SFC ESTATE COACHING presents a low-barrier entry point for entrepreneurs with a modest total investment ($41k-$51k) and a reasonable 5% royalty fee. ✓ The disclosure of a solid Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $198,237 offers initial validation, yet the lack of any new outlets opened last year suggests stagnant demand or an unproven growth strategy. ⚠ With only one total outlet and zero recent expansion, this concept lacks the historical scale and operational proof typically required for a secure franchise investment.

Decimal presents an exceptionally high-risk profile due to its complete lack of scale, operating as a standalone unit with zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure removes any ability to validate the business model's potential return on investment. ⚠ While the franchise fee is low, the massive variance in total investment suggests an undefined or highly variable operational structure. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution given the unproven nature of the system.

Concordia Homecare Franchising presents a compelling but unproven value proposition, featuring a low total investment ($87,633 - $132,317) and strong Item 19 financial performance (AUV $1.57M). ✓ Despite the affordable entry point and clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, the network consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating a lack of established franchise traction. ⚠ Prospective buyers should approach with caution, as the system lacks the validation of a multi-unit operator base despite the high revenue potential.

Whole Property Management is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, yet it reports an exceptionally high Average Unit Volume of $1,129,822. ✓ The franchise offers a highly accessible entry point with a low $10,000 fee and total investment between $40,750 and $65,000. ⚠ However, prospective buyers should note the presence of litigation and the system's static growth, with zero new outlets opened last year.

Quality Pro Services presents a compelling but high-risk profile, characterized by an exceptionally high Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $1.82M against a mid-range total investment of $120k-$230k. ✓ The potential return on investment is significant, but the data is currently limited to a single corporate outlet with zero recent growth or new openings. ⚠ The presence of litigation and a steep $60,000 franchise fee further warrant caution given the lack of operational scale or proven franchise track record.

Taco 105 Franchise, LLC presents a high-risk profile primarily due to its lack of scale, operating as a single-unit concept with zero recent growth. ⚠ While the franchise maintains a clean legal record and offers a mid-range total investment ($203,750 - $434,500), the single location's AUV of $271,405 suggests tight profit margins relative to the entry cost. ✓ Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution, as the absence of a proven track record or operational infrastructure offers little validation of the business model's replicability. ⚠

Royal Filoncino LLC presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging up to $1.2M and a steep 8.0% royalty fee. ⚠ The concept currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, offering no proof of concept or network effect. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further complicates the investment thesis by preventing an assessment of potential ROI. This franchise represents a high-risk, early-stage venture that requires significant capital without the benefit of historical performance data.

Jayasri Sweets presents a compelling but solitary investment case, boasting a high Average Unit Volume of $1,024,316 ✓ that suggests strong unit-level economics. However, the concept is currently unproven at scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth ⚠, making it a de facto startup despite the substantial $243,000 to $497,000 investment requirement. Prospective franchisees must weigh the robust revenue potential against the significant risks associated with a system lacking any operational history or geographic diversification.

Dripology presents a high-risk profile as a single-unit operation with no proven scale or historical growth trajectory. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating the economic viability of the concept. ⚠ With zero new outlets opened and a total dependency on one location, the franchise lacks the stability typically associated with the required $40,000 fee and total investment of up to $400,500.

Small Town Play Cafe presents a compelling but unproven investment opportunity, characterized by a single corporate location that generates a strong Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $1,036,555. ✓ The franchise offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy, though the high total investment of $500k-$792k and $45,000 franchise fee pose significant financial risk. ⚠ With only one outlet opened and zero closed last year, the concept lacks the scale and operational track record required to validate system-wide replicability. ⚠

Senior Smile presents a significant risk profile as a startup concept with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating the economic model, while the $60,000 franchise fee appears steep relative to the system's lack of scale and proof of concept. ✓ The investment range of $125,000 to $201,000 offers a relatively low capital entry point, and the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a preliminary positive.

iMove PT® presents a low-barrier entry point for owner-operators with a modest total investment ($44.8k–$68k) and a single corporate outlet validating the model with a strong AUV of $362,254. ✓ However, the concept lacks scale and proven replicability, having opened zero new units last year while maintaining a 9.0% royalty fee on a very small network. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should note this is an unproven opportunity in terms of growth trajectory, relying entirely on the performance of the sole original location.

Little Sheep Hot Pot presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging up to $1.9 million and a substantial $100,000 franchise fee. ⚠ Significant risk factors exist due to a lack of financial performance representations (Item 19), disclosed litigation, and a minimal footprint of only one total outlet. ✓ The franchise demonstrates stability with no closures, but the single-unit scale provides limited evidence of a proven growth trajectory for new investors.

Darbar's Chicken presents a significant financial risk as a startup concept requiring a total investment of up to $432,400 despite having absolutely no operational scale or proof of concept. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure combined with zero outlets opened last year makes it impossible to validate the potential return on such a high capital outlay. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should be wary of paying a $39,900 franchise fee for a system that currently consists of a single unit with no growth trajectory.

MYSA Franchising presents a compelling value proposition with an Average Unit Volume of $556,562, which significantly exceeds the total initial investment range of $232,900 to $421,800. ✓ However, the system currently consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating the brand is in the earliest stages of franchising with an unproven scale. ⚠ While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive sign, the minimal operational history poses a significant risk for prospective franchisees. ⚠

Cupcake Heaven is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, making it a startup concept rather than an established franchise system. ✓ The franchise offers a low entry fee of $10,000 and reasonable royalty rates, though the total investment varies significantly from $68,600 to $189,450. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a major red flag, as it prevents prospective investors from validating the economic viability of the model. ⚠ With zero growth last year and only one operating location, the franchise carries high risks regarding sustainability and proven performance.

Level Up Franchise, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with no proven scale or franchise track record. ✓ The investment barrier is exceptionally low ($41.3k–$57.7k) with an accessible $12,000 fee. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure and zero recent outlet growth make it impossible to validate the business model's profitability. This represents a high-risk, ground-floor opportunity lacking the data necessary for a thorough financial assessment.

This franchise presents a high-risk profile due to its status as a single-unit operation with no proven scale or historical growth trajectory. ⚠ The investment requirement of $235,000 to $453,500 is substantial relative to the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving potential returns completely unverified. ✓ The corporate history is clean with no record of litigation or bankruptcy, but the absence of any new outlets opening suggests the concept is currently stagnant.

Viyada Thai Spa presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $311,400 to $468,350, targeting the premium wellness market. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history offers a clean risk profile, and the inclusion of an Item 19 provides necessary financial transparency. ⚠ However, the concept is currently unproven as a scalable franchise model, operating with only one total outlet and recording zero growth in the last year. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face significant risk investing in a system that has not yet demonstrated replication or momentum.

LaserPrecision Marksmanship Club is currently a single-unit operation with no proven scale or franchise track record, presenting a high-risk profile for potential investors. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of the business model's profitability, while the $37,000 franchise fee is steep for a brand with zero recent growth. ⚠ With a total investment reaching up to $284,100 and a 6.0% royalty fee, the cost of entry is significant relative to the lack of operational history and support infrastructure.

EVA presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity requiring nearly $1 million in liquidity, yet it offers a clean record with no litigation or bankruptcy history ✓. The lack of recent unit growth and a single operating outlet suggest the concept is currently unproven at scale ⚠. While the brand provides financial performance disclosures, the high total investment combined with a 5% royalty fee poses a significant risk given the absence of an established network.

BPK Franchisors, LLC exhibits a minimal operational footprint with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, suggesting the concept is likely in the very early stages of franchising. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant risk for prospective investors, particularly given the wide total investment range of $299,250 to $608,500. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy provides a clean legal baseline, but the 6.0% royalty fee is standard rather than a competitive advantage for an unproven system.

Kitchen Guard Services presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $173,700 to $308,550 and a substantial $44,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The lack of an existing network (1 total outlet) and zero growth last year indicate the concept is unproven at scale, posing significant execution risks for early adopters. ✓ The franchise offers financial transparency through an Item 19 disclosure and maintains a clean legal record, though the standard 8.0% royalty rate adds ongoing pressure to margins.

This franchise presents a low-risk administrative profile with no history of litigation or bankruptcy, but its single-unit scale suggests it is an unproven concept with minimal market penetration. ✓ The entry fee is relatively accessible, though the total investment varies significantly, requiring careful capital planning. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure combined with zero recent growth makes it difficult to assess profitability or future trajectory.

This franchise presents a high-risk profile due to its minimal scale, operating with only a single total outlet after opening one location in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement of $194,400 to $515,000 is substantial relative to the concept's lack of operational history and absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure. ⚠ With no proven track record of closures or growth, prospective franchisees are essentially funding a startup with limited data to support the $40,000 franchise fee and 6.0% royalty rate.

Lime House Franchise, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a nascent concept with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, removing critical data needed to validate the potential return on a substantial investment ranging from $348k to $781k. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive administrative note, but the single-unit scale suggests the system is unproven and lacks operational maturity.

Pixiu Malahongtang presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $303,500 to $548,000, yet it currently lacks the operational scale to justify the cost or risk. ⚠ The network consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, offering no proof of replicability or market traction. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential returns for prospective franchisees.

Holt Computer Training currently operates as a single-unit system with no recent growth, indicating it is either a new concept or stagnant. ⚠ The franchise presents significant red flags for investors, including a historical bankruptcy and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation. ⚠ With a total investment ranging up to $420,000 and 6.0% royalties, the financial risk is high given the lack of proven scale or transparency.

Terrace Up Franchising Inc. exhibits exceptional unit economics with an AUV of $1,431,519, significantly justifying the high total investment of $245,900 to $368,100. ✓ Despite the clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, the concept remains highly unproven with only one total outlet opened to date. ⚠ Prospective partners must exercise extreme caution due to the total lack of scale and operational history.

Gorilla Franchising USA, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a nascent concept with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, making it difficult to validate the business model. ✓ The franchise offers a compelling Average Unit Volume ($313,405) relative to the low initial investment ($100k+), and maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the lack of an operational track record and minimal scale suggest this is an unproven opportunity suited only for risk-tolerant investors.

Another Nine, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with a minimal growth trajectory, having opened zero net new locations beyond its sole existing outlet. The franchise presents a significant financial risk with a high initial investment reaching up to $397,350 and a steep 6.5% royalty fee, yet it fails to provide an Item 19 financial performance representation to substantiate these costs. While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a ✓, the absence of scale and verified earnings data makes this a highly speculative opportunity.

Sunpark USA is currently a single-unit operation with a minimal growth trajectory, having opened only one location last year. ⚠ The franchise requires a significant capital investment ranging from $385,500 to $773,000, yet lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive indicator, though the lack of scale presents a high risk for new investors.

Plumbing Paramedics currently lacks scale and operational validation, operating with only a single total outlet and recording zero growth last year. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an objective assessment of unit economics and potential return on investment. ⚠ While the initial franchise fee and 5.0% royalty are standard, the lack of a proven track record makes this a high-risk proposition compared to established competitors.

Creatif presents a high-risk profile as a nascent franchise concept with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ✓ The company maintains a clean record with no litigation or bankruptcy, and provides financial performance data (Item 19) to validate the model. ⚠ However, the single-unit footprint offers no proof of replicability or operational stability for new investors. ⚠ Additionally, the $45,000 franchise fee combined with a 7.0% royalty rate is significant given the lack of an established brand or economy of scale.

Accor PME - Handwritten Collection presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $1.4 million to $83.2 million, targeting sophisticated developers rather than individual owner-operators. ✓ The concept shows early stability with no closures or litigation reported, though the single-outlet footprint makes it a nascent, unproven scale model. ⚠ A critical risk for prospective buyers is the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, providing no empirical data to validate the potential return on such a substantial capital outlay.

Blue Sage Franchising is an extremely early-stage concept with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year, indicating an unproven business model. ⚠ The brand carries a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $535k to $773k, which is a significant risk given the lack of operational scale. ✓ The opportunity offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy, and the 6.0% royalty fee is standard for the industry. ✓ The inclusion of an Item 19 financial disclosure provides essential data for potential investors to evaluate viability.

Ivan Ramen presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $1 million to nearly $2 million, though it benefits from a clean background with no litigation, bankruptcy, or recent closures. ⚠ The franchise currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, signaling a very early-stage or stagnant expansion strategy. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant risk for investors, particularly given the high capital requirement and unproven franchise track record.

Stratos Jets presents a high-barrier entry with a $200,000 franchise fee and a total investment up to $263,000, yet it currently operates with only a single outlet and zero new locations opened last year. The lack of Item 19 financial performance representations is a significant red flag, making it impossible to verify unit economics or potential ROI. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive, the stagnant growth trajectory and high upfront cost suggest this is an unproven model with considerable execution risk.

I and S FR LLC is currently a single-unit operation with a minimal growth trajectory, having opened and closed zero outlets last year. ✓ The franchise demonstrates strong unit-level economics with an Average Unit Volume of $873,726 against a mid-range total investment of $262,300 - $395,350. ⚠ However, the lack of scale presents a significant risk, as the system consists of only one outlet, offering limited proof of replicability despite a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy.