Companies
Column Legend (click to collapse)
Growth = (opened-closed)/total (20%+ hot, -10% shrinking)
AUV = Avg Unit Volume
%Achv = % achieving average
T = Terminations
NR = Non-Renewals
CO = Ceased Operations
Fail% = Failure rate (T+NR+CO)/total
Risk = Score 0-100 (0-29 low/30-59 med/60+ high)
19 = Has Item 19
L = Litigation
B = Bankruptcy
Tip: Select checkboxes to compare up to 6 franchises side-by-side
| Name | Industry | Files | Fee | Royalty | Investment | Outlets ▼ | Growth | AUV | Median | %Achv | T/NR/CO | Fail% | Risk | GM/EB | Flags | Updated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | Retail | 12 |
$30K
|
6.0%
+3.0%ad
|
— | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Conroy's, Inc. presents a difficult assessment due to a complete lack of data regarding unit count, total investment, and system-wide growth. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential ROI, while the missing outlet counts obscure the brand's true scale and trajectory. ⚠ Although the franchise offers a standard fee structure with a $30,000 entry cost and 6.0% royalty, the severe information gaps pose significant risks for prospective investors.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| F | Food & Beverage | 24 |
$10K–$35K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$435K–$4.4M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 1 day | ||
|
Famous Dave's presents a highly variable total investment requirement ranging from $435,000 to $4.4 million, accompanied by a notably low $10,000 franchise fee and a standard 5.0% royalty rate. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback, making it difficult for prospective franchisees to validate potential returns given the massive capital expenditure required. ⚠ The lack of reported outlet counts or recent growth metrics, combined with a history of active litigation, further obscures the brand's current scale and market trajectory. ✓ Ultimately, the low initial entry fee is heavily outweighed by the high financial risks, lack of earnings transparency, and operational uncertainties.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| w | Health & Medical | 5 |
$20K
|
5.0%
|
$57K–$100K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
This franchise presents a low barrier to entry with a competitive $19,900 fee and a modest 5.0% royalty rate within the $57k-$100k investment range. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant drawback, as it prevents the verification of earnings potential. ⚠ Additionally, the lack of scale data and growth metrics makes it difficult to assess the system's stability and trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Pet Services | 19 |
$50K
|
10.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$78K–$117K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 1 day | ||
|
Bark Busters presents a highly accessible entry point into the pet services industry with a total investment ranging from $77,900 to $117,000 ✓. However, the financial structure carries notable risks, combining a steep $49,500 franchise fee with a heavy 10.0% royalty rate ⚠. The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it difficult for prospective franchisees to project potential returns ⚠. Additionally, the lack of scale transparency due to missing outlet data and the presence of recent litigation are significant red flags that warrant careful investigation ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| O | Fitness & Wellness | 43 |
$0K–$60K
|
8.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$765K–$1.1M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 1 day | ||
|
ORANGETHEORY presents a high-barrier-to-entry fitness franchise requiring a total investment between $764,577 and $1,104,920. ✓ The franchise offers a unique incentive by charging a $0 initial franchise fee, though operators must account for a standard 8.0% ongoing royalty rate. ⚠ Prospective investors must exercise caution due to the presence of active litigation and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, which prevents the independent verification of unit profitability. ⚠ Additionally, the lack of reported data regarding total unit count and recent outlet growth makes it difficult to accurately assess the brand's current market scale and trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||