Companies
Column Legend (click to collapse)
Growth = (opened-closed)/total (20%+ hot, -10% shrinking)
AUV = Avg Unit Volume
%Achv = % achieving average
T = Terminations
NR = Non-Renewals
CO = Ceased Operations
Fail% = Failure rate (T+NR+CO)/total
Risk = Score 0-100 (0-29 low/30-59 med/60+ high)
19 = Has Item 19
L = Litigation
B = Bankruptcy
Tip: Select checkboxes to compare up to 6 franchises side-by-side
| Name | Industry | Files | Fee | Royalty | Investment | Outlets ▼ | Growth | AUV | Median | %Achv | T/NR/CO | Fail% | Risk | GM/EB | Flags | Updated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | Health & Medical | 2 |
$50K
|
— |
$80K–$155K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
The B-12 Store Franchise, Inc. presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment of $80,000 to $155,000 ✓, making it an accessible option for entrepreneurs with limited capital. However, the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation ⚠ and missing data regarding outlet counts or unit growth ⚠ make it difficult to assess the system's scale or track record. Additionally, the disclosure of active litigation ⚠ introduces risk that requires thorough due diligence before investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| J | Food & Beverage | 9 |
$30K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$158K–$438K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 1 month | ||
|
JB Brothers Inc. dba Poke Bar presents a moderate entry point into the fast-casual sector with a total investment ranging from $157,800 to $438,000 and a standard $30,000 franchise fee. ⚠ Significant transparency risks exist as the franchise lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure and discloses active litigation, making it difficult for prospective franchisees to assess financial performance or legal stability. ⚠ The absence of scale data and growth metrics further complicates the viability analysis for this concept.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$25K–$35K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$326K–$459K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
This franchise presents a low barrier to entry with a competitive $25,000 fee and a standard total investment of $326,000 to $459,000. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a positive indicator of corporate stability. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an assessment of unit-level profitability. ⚠ Furthermore, missing data regarding outlet counts and growth makes it impossible to evaluate the brand's scale or market trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| H | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$35K
|
4.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$215K–$415K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Hop & Grape Holding LLC presents a low-risk administrative profile with no history of litigation or bankruptcy, but the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an objective assessment of unit economics. ⚠ The lack of scale is a major concern, as total outlet counts and growth metrics are unavailable, suggesting the concept may be unproven or in a very early stage of development. While the $35,000 franchise fee and 4.0% royalty are competitive within the $215k–$415k total investment range, the missing performance data creates significant uncertainty for potential investors.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| T | Real Estate | 1 |
$30K–$35K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$67K–$167K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
TYHF Corp presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $66,689 to $167,131 and a standard $30,000 franchise fee ✓. The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback, as it prevents prospective franchisees from validating the business model's profitability ⚠. Additionally, the lack of data regarding total outlets or recent unit growth makes it impossible to assess the system's scale or market traction ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Automotive | 1 |
$40K
|
6.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$209K–$549K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
This franchise presents a high entry barrier with a total investment ranging from $209,100 to $548,800, yet it fails to provide the Item 19 financial performance data usually critical for validating such a significant capital outlay. ⚠ The lack of scale is a major concern, as the "N/A" outlet count suggests the brand is likely unproven or lacks operational history, offering no evidence of a growth trajectory. ⚠ While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a basic positive ✓, the combination of a steep $39,500 fee and 6% royalty rate is difficult to justify without transparent unit economics or a demonstrated track record of success.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| J | Fitness & Wellness | 11 |
$40K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$183K–$356K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
JB Holdings presents a low-risk administrative profile with no history of litigation or bankruptcy, but the absence of an Item 19 prevents a clear assessment of unit economics. ⚠ The lack of scale and missing outlet data make it impossible to gauge the brand's growth trajectory or operational stability. ✓ The total investment of $183,000 - $356,000 is relatively accessible, though the 6.0% royalty fee requires verification of value without proven financial performance.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Home Services | 2 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Bringpro Group, Inc. presents a high-risk profile due to a complete lack of operational transparency, failing to disclose critical data regarding unit count, fees, and total investment. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential ROI, and the lack of historical growth metrics makes it impossible to determine market traction. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution as there is currently no quantifiable evidence of scale, stability, or system performance.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| T | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$50K
|
3.0%
|
$145K–$319K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Thomas Restaurants Inc presents a low-cost market entry point with a total investment between $145,200 and $319,100, complemented by a competitive 3.0% royalty rate and a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure represents a significant risk for investors, as it prevents the verification of potential earnings or operational viability. ⚠ Critical data regarding the system's scale, total outlets, and growth trajectory is currently unavailable, making it difficult to assess the franchise's stability or market presence.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Cleaning & Restoration | 2 |
$20K–$30K
|
8.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$53K–$111K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
| A | Education & Training | 5 |
$5K–$23K
|
8.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$17K–$51K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
| C | Food & Beverage | 40 | — | — |
$293K–$480K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Chatime presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $293,100 to $479,900. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history indicates a clean legal record, but the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant ⚠ for prospective investors. ⚠ Crucially, the unavailability of scale, unit counts, or growth metrics makes it impossible to assess the brand's current market trajectory or operational stability.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| T | Child Services | 1 |
$50K
|
8.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$332K–$512K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
The Real Food Academy Franchise LLC presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $332,100 to $511,950, coupled with a steep $49,500 franchise fee and an above-average 8.0% royalty rate. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag for prospective investors, as it prevents the verification of potential ROI or unit economics. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy history offers basic operational stability, though the inability to track outlet counts or growth trajectories suggests the brand lacks scale and transparency.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Food & Beverage | 1 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
This franchise presents a complete lack of operational transparency, with critical data regarding total outlets, fees, and investment costs listed as N/A. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any meaningful assessment of unit economics or potential return on investment. ⚠ While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a technical positive ✓, the inability to verify scale or growth trajectory makes this an extremely high-risk proposition.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | Business Services | 5 |
$100K–$125K
|
15.0%
|
$112K–$344K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
| T | Pet Services | 1 |
$25K–$45K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$712K–$1.1M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
TailWaggers Franchise Trio represents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $712,300 to $1.1 million, suggesting a focus on large-scale facilities rather than lean startups. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean legal record with no history of litigation or bankruptcy, and the 5.0% royalty fee aligns with industry standards. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an objective assessment of potential returns, which is a significant risk given the substantial capital required. ⚠ The lack of data regarding outlet counts or recent unit growth further obscures the brand's current market traction and operational stability.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| H | Business Services | 2 |
$38K
|
— |
$57K–$158K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
HM Franchise, Inc. presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment of $57,000 - $158,400 and a clean background regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓. However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an objective assessment of unit economics or potential ROI ⚠. Additionally, the absence of scale, growth data, and royalty information suggests this is likely an unproven or early-stage concept with significant performance ambiguity ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| E | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$30K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$190K–$955K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Elbow’s Mac N Cheese presents a niche casual dining concept with a wide total investment range of $190,100 to $954,800, though the lack of scale data makes it difficult to assess market traction. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback for prospective investors evaluating return on investment. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, but the unverified growth trajectory requires substantial due diligence.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Business Services | 1 |
$50K–$70K
|
7.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$151K–$261K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Stone Environmental Services Franchise, LLC presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $150,700 to $260,500 and a premium $50,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback, as it prevents prospective franchisees from validating the potential return on investment against the 7.0% royalty rate. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy history offers basic operational stability, but the inability to track outlet openings or closures makes it impossible to gauge market traction or growth trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| O | Retail | 18 |
$0K
|
0.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$59K–$156K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Ota Healthmate presents a low barrier to entry with a $0 franchise fee and a total investment ranging from $59k to $156k ✓, making it an accessible option for entrepreneurs with limited capital. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ and missing data regarding outlet counts or royalty structures make it impossible to benchmark system performance or validate the business model. This concept currently lacks the operational history and financial transparency typically required for a secure investment assessment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$30K
|
5.0%
|
$75K–$76K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Soup Korner LLC presents an exceptionally low barrier to entry with a total investment of roughly $75k and a standard 5.0% royalty fee ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it impossible to validate potential returns ⚠. Additionally, the lack of scale data and growth metrics suggests this is likely an unproven or early-stage concept with significant operational risk ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$49K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$438K–$1.3M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Aurelio's Is Pizza Franchise, Ltd. presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $437,904 to $1.25 million and a $49,000 franchise fee ✓. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive indicator ✓, the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback for prospective investors ⚠. Additionally, the unavailability of outlet count and growth data makes it difficult to assess the brand's current scale and market trajectory ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| G | Food & Beverage | 15 |
$0K
|
— |
$20K–$156K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 1 month | ||
|
This franchise presents a confusing financial profile with a $0 franchise fee but a lack of transparency regarding royalty rates and total outlet count. ✓ The low minimum investment of $20,000 offers an accessible entry point, though the absence of an Item 19 prevents verification of potential returns. ⚠ Investors should exercise significant caution due to the disclosure of active litigation and the general lack of key performance data.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Business Services | 1 |
$10K
|
6.0%
|
— | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
This franchise presents a low barrier to entry with a $10,000 fee and a clean background record ✓, but the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents a data-backed assessment of potential returns ⚠. The lack of scale data and "N/A" metrics for outlet counts makes it impossible to verify the brand's stability or growth trajectory ⚠. Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution, as the total investment remains unknown and the business model lacks performance transparency ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Food & Beverage | 45 |
$3K–$50K
|
5.0%
|
$24K–$169K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Snowfox presents an accessible market entry strategy characterized by a low $3,000 franchise fee and a total investment potentially as low as $23,752 ✓. The 5.0% royalty rate is standard, and the corporate record is clean with no history of litigation or bankruptcy ✓. However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents a data-backed assessment of profitability, and missing outlet data makes it impossible to gauge the system's scale or recent growth trajectory ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Food & Beverage | 16 |
$50K
|
5.0%
+4.5%ad
|
$1.1M–$4.0M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 50 | — | L B | 1 month | ||
|
This franchise presents a high-risk profile due to the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation and a history of both litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ The total investment is substantial, ranging from roughly $1 million to $4 million, which represents significant capital exposure without guaranteed performance data. ⚠ The lack of transparency regarding outlet counts or growth metrics further complicates the ability to assess the system's current health and trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Child Services | 1 |
$20K
|
7.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$102K–$144K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
SKATETIME SI LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a modest franchise fee and a total investment ranging from $102k to $144k ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback for prospective investors assessing potential returns ⚠. Additionally, the lack of data regarding total outlets and recent unit growth suggests this is likely an emerging or early-stage concept with unproven scale ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| G | Home Services | 11 |
$39K–$44K
|
7.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$116K–$181K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Greenlight Mobility presents a low-barrier entry into the mobility sector with a total investment of $116,200 - $180,500, though the $38,500 franchise fee and 7.0% royalty require careful ROI analysis. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history indicates a clean legal record, but the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback for potential investors. ⚠ Additionally, the unavailability of outlet counts or growth metrics suggests limited operational scale or transparency, making this a high-risk opportunity for data-driven franchisees. ⚠
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Food & Beverage | 3 |
$0K–$62K
|
6.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$204K–$592K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Schmizza presents an extremely low barrier to entry with a $100 franchise fee, though the total investment remains a standard mid-range $203,500 to $591,500. ⚠ The brand lacks scale and transparency, failing to disclose outlet counts, growth metrics, or financial performance data (Item 19). ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive legal indicator, but the lack of financial validation makes this a high-risk proposition for potential investors.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$40K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$328K–$713K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Sammy’s Sliders presents a high-barrier entry strategy with a total investment ranging from $328,300 to $712,600, positioning it as a significant capital commitment for prospective franchisees. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a critical drawback, as investors lack the necessary data to validate potential returns against the steep upfront cost. ⚠ A complete lack of scale and growth metrics (Total Outlets N/A) further complicates the assessment, signaling an unproven or opaque operational footprint.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| R | Business Services | 1 |
$50K
|
— |
$99K–$201K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Red Wagon Club Franchise, LLC presents a low-risk administrative profile with no history of litigation or bankruptcy, but the total lack of scale and operational data makes it a high-risk proposition for investors. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation and missing data on unit counts or closures prevents a concrete assessment of the business model's viability or growth trajectory. ✓ The entry cost is relatively accessible with a total investment between $99,250 and $200,500, though the value proposition is questionable given the $50,000 franchise fee and zero transparency regarding royalties.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| R | Fitness & Wellness | 1 |
$20K
|
7.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$185K–$278K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
Red Effect International Franchise presents a low barrier to entry with a $20,000 franchise fee and a total investment ranging from $184,500 to $277,500. ⚠ Significant risks are present due to the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation, the absence of scale or growth data, and a disclosure of litigation. ⚠ The 7.0% royalty rate adds ongoing costs for a system that currently demonstrates no operational track record or proven outlets.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| R | Home Services | 1 |
$50K
|
7.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$120K–$218K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
ReCoat Revolution Franchise, LLC presents a high-barrier entry point with a total investment ranging from $119,900 to $218,300 and a premium $50,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant risk for prospective investors, particularly given the lack of operational scale or verified outlet counts. ⚠ Additionally, the 7.0% royalty rate adds ongoing pressure to a concept with no disclosed track record of units opened or closed.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| R | Home Services | 11 |
$60K–$74K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$218K–$390K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
ROOF SCIENTIST presents a high-barrier entry point with a total investment ranging from $218k to nearly $390k, which is steep given the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation. ⚠ The disclosure of active litigation introduces operational or legal risk, while the lack of scale data (N/A outlets) suggests the brand is either in a very early stage or failing to gain traction. ✓ The 5.0% royalty fee is standard for the home services sector, but the high franchise fee of $59,900 demands scrutiny against the unproven return on investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Q | Business Services | 1 |
$75K
|
13.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$89K–$109K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Quality Staffing Group, Inc. presents a low-barrier entry point with a total investment of $88,950 to $108,900, though the $75,000 franchise fee consumes the majority of this capital. ⚠ The franchise lacks an Item 19 financial performance representation, making it impossible to validate potential returns against the steep 13.0% royalty rate. ⚠ The absence of outlet data and scale metrics suggests this is an unproven or nascent system with high relative costs for a service-based concept.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| P | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$0K
|
0.4%
|
$1.5M–$5.2M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | 19 | 2 months | ||
|
Piggly Wiggly Midwest, LLC presents a high-barrier entry opportunity requiring a total investment of $1.5M to $5.1M, though it offers an exceptionally low ongoing cost structure with a 0.375% royalty rate. ✓ The lack of franchise fees and the provision of an Item 19 are distinct financial advantages for well-capitalized operators. ⚠ However, the absence of outlet growth data and scale metrics makes it difficult to assess the brand's current trajectory and operational stability.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| F | Food & Beverage | 9 |
$30K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$152K–$286K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 1 month | ||
|
Fuji Grill Inc presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $152,400 to $286,300 and a reasonable 5.0% royalty fee ✓. The franchise poses significant transparency risks, as it lacks an Item 19 financial performance representation and fails to disclose outlet counts or growth metrics ⚠. Additionally, the disclosure of active litigation is a red flag that warrants caution, particularly given the absence of data regarding system stability ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| P | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$30K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$120K–$447K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Pastito Franchise Corp presents a moderate barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $120,250 to $447,000 and a standard 6.0% royalty fee ✓. The franchise maintains a clean background with no reported litigation or bankruptcy history ✓, though the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents a detailed review of unit economics ⚠. Additionally, the absence of outlet count data makes it impossible to gauge the system's scale or recent growth trajectory ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| P | Beauty & Personal Care | 2 |
$45K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$353K–$620K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
P&b Franchise represents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity requiring a total capitalization between $352,770 and $619,750. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history offers basic operational stability, though the lack of scale data makes it difficult to assess market traction. ⚠ The most significant risk is the missing Item 19 financial disclosure, which prevents prospective investors from validating potential returns against the substantial upfront and ongoing royalty costs. ⚠
|
||||||||||||||||||
| O | Food & Beverage | 13 |
$15K–$35K
|
5.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$107K–$606K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Orange Leaf FC, LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a $15,000 franchise fee and a wide total investment range of $106,500 to $605,500. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive indicator of corporate stability. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an assessment of unit economics, and missing outlet data obscures the brand's scale and growth trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| W | Food & Beverage | 8 |
$20K–$40K
|
5.0%
|
$156K–$215K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
This franchise presents a low-cost entry point into the beverage retail sector with a $20,000 fee and total investment between $155,800 and $214,700. ✓ The lack of litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive indicator of corporate stability. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an objective assessment of potential returns. ⚠ Additionally, the lack of scale and missing outlet data suggests an unproven or opaque growth trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$50K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$2.1M–$3.8M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 50 | — | L B | 2 months | ||
|
Mr. Gatti's Operating, LLC presents a high-barrier investment opportunity requiring a total commitment of $2.1M to $3.8M, positioning it in the premium segment of the restaurant sector. ⚠ Significant risk factors are present, including a lack of financial performance representations (Item 19) and a history of both litigation and bankruptcy. ✓ The brand offers a standard 5.0% royalty fee, though the absence of outlet growth data makes it difficult to assess current market trajectory. Prospective franchisees must exercise extreme caution given the high capital requirement combined with limited financial transparency.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Business Services | 7 | — | — | — | — |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
CAITS ESTATE SERVICES INC. presents a high-risk profile due to a complete lack of operational transparency, failing to disclose scale, fees, or investment costs. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any validation of potential return on investment, while missing outlet counts make it impossible to gauge market traction. ⚠ Although the franchise carries no recorded litigation or bankruptcy, the severe data void suggests the system may be immature or unproven.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$45K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$502K–$962K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Mr Brews Taphouse® presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $501,500 to $962,000, positioning it in the upscale casual dining segment. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean legal record with no history of litigation or bankruptcy, and enforces a standard 5.0% royalty fee. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback for prospective investors seeking validated returns. ⚠ Additionally, the absence of outlet data makes it impossible to analyze the brand's current scale or growth trajectory.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Food & Beverage | 8 |
$40K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$389K–$724K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Candy Cloud presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $389,100 to $724,350, making it significantly more capital-intensive than typical retail concepts. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents prospective franchisees from validating the potential return on such a substantial investment. ⚠ A lack of scale and missing outlet data make it impossible to assess the system's growth trajectory or operational stability. ✓ The clean legal record is a positive note, but the overall profile suggests a high-risk venture suited only for well-capitalized investors.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| L | Home Services | 24 |
$4K–$49K
|
8.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$154K–$334K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | L | 2 months | ||
|
Lightspeed Restoration presents a low barrier to entry with a franchise fee of $4,250 and a total investment ranging from $154,230 to $334,000 ✓. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure and the lack of scale data make it difficult to assess the business's profitability and historical performance ⚠. Additionally, the disclosure of active litigation introduces a risk factor that prospective franchisees must investigate carefully ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$70K–$75K
|
7.5%
+1.0%ad
|
$360K–$572K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
MOTW Coffee & Pastries Franchising, LLC presents a high-cost entry point with a total investment reaching up to $571,500 and a steep 7.5% royalty fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag, preventing prospective franchisees from validating potential returns against the substantial capital required. ⚠ A complete lack of scale and growth data further complicates the assessment of the brand's stability and market traction.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$10K–$30K
|
3.5%
+1.0%ad
|
$750K–$3.4M
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Monkburger Franchise Group presents a highly accessible entry point with a low $10,000 franchise fee and a competitive 3.5% royalty rate ✓. However, the total investment is substantial, ranging from roughly $750,000 to over $3.4 million, which creates a high financial barrier to entry despite the low initial fee ⚠. The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation and lack of scale data pose significant risks for investors seeking proven returns or operational stability ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| L | Child Services | 3 |
$65K
|
6.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$436K–$881K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Little Kitchen Academy presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity with a total cost ranging from $436k to nearly $881k, positioning it in the premium segment of the children's education market. While the franchise maintains a clean legal record ✓, the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback for prospective investors trying to validate the model ⚠. The lack of reported unit counts or growth metrics further obscures the brand's operational scale and market traction ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| J | Cleaning & Restoration | 21 |
$10K–$196K
|
10.0%
+1.5%ad
|
$13K–$218K
|
— |
|
— | — | — | — | — | 0 | — | — | 2 months | ||
|
Forward Franchising, Inc. presents a highly accessible entry point with a low $10,000 franchise fee and a total investment starting at just $12,955 ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a major drawback, making it impossible for investors to validate potential earnings ⚠. Additionally, the lack of data regarding total outlets or recent growth activity suggests this may be an unproven or early-stage concept with limited operational history ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||