Companies

Milkshop Japan Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a startup concept with zero operational outlets and no track record of successful openings. ⚠ The franchise requires a substantial initial investment of up to $951,200 and charges ongoing royalties, yet fails to provide an Item 19 financial disclosure to substantiate potential returns. ⚠ With no units opened or closed in the last year, the system lacks scale and validation, making it a speculative venture suited only for risk-tolerant investors.

Pizzaexpress US Limited currently reports zero total outlets with no units opened or closed in the last year, indicating a dormant or pre-launch operational status in the US market. ⚠ The franchise carries a significant entry barrier with a total investment ranging from $930,847 to $1,955,672, and presents a major red flag due to a disclosed history of bankruptcy. ✓ The opportunity does offer financial performance representations (Item 19) and maintains a clean litigation record, but the lack of scale and solvency concerns suggest high risk.

Cook Space, LLC presents a high-risk profile with a total investment of $233,000 - $279,000 despite having zero active outlets and no proven operating history. ⚠ The disclosure of historical bankruptcy is a critical red flag that overshadows the low $10,000 franchise fee and the absence of litigation. ⚠ With no Item 19 financial data and zero growth last year, the concept lacks the validation required to justify the significant capital outlay.

PURAIR Franchising LLC presents a high-risk profile as an unproven concept, evidenced by a total outlet count of zero and no openings in the last year. While the franchise offers an Item 19 financial disclosure ✓, the combination of a steep initial investment ($206,930 - $508,500) and active litigation ⚠ raises significant concerns for prospective investors. The lack of an operational track record makes it difficult to validate the business model against the 7.0% royalty fee.

Bobae Global, Inc. presents a high-risk opportunity as a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no established operating history. ⚠ The entry cost is substantial, requiring a total investment between $335,500 and $583,500, yet the company lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ⚠ With no units opened or closed last year, the concept remains unproven in the market, offering no tangible evidence of unit-level economics or scalability.

This franchise presents a high-risk profile with a total investment ranging from $538,400 to $958,300 but currently operates zero outlets. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure removes any visibility into potential ROI, while the lack of an established system makes the $35,000 fee and 7.5% royalty difficult to justify. ⚠ With zero growth and no operational history, this concept appears to be an unproven startup rather than a replicable franchise model.

Honest Art is an early-stage, low-cost art education franchise requiring an initial investment between $133,300 and $266,750. While the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive sign, the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag that limits visibility into potential unit economics. With no disclosed outlet data, the system appears to be in a pre-growth or nascent phase, suggesting high execution risk for early adopters.

Taco Maya presents a high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale, with zero total outlets and no growth recorded in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial ($369k - $919k) yet lacks the validation of an Item 19 financial performance representation, making it difficult to assess potential returns. ✓ The franchise offers a relatively low ongoing royalty rate of 3.5% and maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. Ultimately, this concept offers no proof of market viability and requires an unproven "pioneer" investment.

Stiltz Franchising, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a startup concept with zero total outlets and no operational history. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating profitability, while the lack of any opened or closed units indicates the franchise has not yet proven its market traction. ✓ With no history of litigation or bankruptcy, the corporate record is clean, but the $40,000 franchise fee and 6.0% royalty rate apply to an entirely unproven business model requiring a total investment of up to $336,500.

Lee's Gimbap presents a high-risk opportunity as a pre-revenue concept, evidenced by zero total outlets and no growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise requires significant capital investment ($331,500 - $585,000) yet lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ⚠ While the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive administrative note, the lack of an operating track record makes this a speculative venture.

Scoops Lacrosse presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment cost under $60,000, making it an accessible option for first-time owners. However, the absence of Item 19 financial performance representations is a significant red flag, preventing due diligence on potential earnings. The lack of disclosed outlet data and N/A growth metrics suggest this is likely a very young or pre-revenue concept with an unproven business model.

WNFranchising, LLC presents a high-risk profile due to a complete lack of operational scale, with zero total outlets and no growth in the past year. ⚠ The combination of a high 7.0% royalty rate and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure makes it impossible to validate potential returns. ⚠ Significant red flags include a disclosed litigation history and a steep $49,500 franchise fee for an unproven concept.

Vizta Tint Holdings, INC presents a high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale with zero total outlets and no growth in the last year. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of earning potential, while the disclosure of ongoing litigation adds a significant layer of legal risk for prospective franchisees. Although the total investment of $58,650 - $119,800 is relatively low, the combination of a 7.0% royalty fee and an unproven operating model suggests caution is warranted.

CorePlus presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $713,200 to $1,198,500, yet it currently lacks any operating history or scale with zero total outlets. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant risk for prospective franchisees evaluating the potential return on such a substantial capital outlay. ⚠ With zero openings, closings, or active units, the concept appears to be a startup opportunity with no proven trajectory or market validation.

Greenlight Personal Training presents a high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale, with zero total outlets and no growth recorded in the last year. ⚠ The franchise requires a significant initial investment and charges an 8.0% royalty fee, yet fails to provide an Item 19 financial disclosure to substantiate potential returns. ⚠ The absence of an operating track record or any active franchisees makes it impossible to validate the business model or unit economics.

The Fresh Monkee Franchise currently lacks any operational scale, reporting 0 total outlets and no growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise fee is exceptionally high at $125,000, representing a significant portion of the total investment ($149,100 - $447,000) for an unproven concept. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an assessment of potential ROI, creating substantial risk for investors.

TEATOP presents a significant market entry risk as a pre-launch franchise system with zero established outlets, meaning prospective partners cannot validate the business model or consumer demand. ⚠ The franchise fee of $40,000 is notably aggressive for an unproven concept, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any data-driven assessment of potential ROI. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history offers basic legal solvency, but the total investment of $140,500 to $297,500 represents a high-stakes gamble on a system with no operating history.

Nana's Green Tea presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $627,400 to $1,508,400, yet it currently lacks any operational scale with zero total outlets. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of potential returns, which is a significant risk given the substantial capital required. ⚠ With zero growth recorded last year and no established footprint, this concept lacks the proven track record typically necessary to justify such a high-cost investment.

D Spot Dessert Cafe presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $785,250 to $1,843,300, yet it currently lacks the scale to justify this capital intensity. ⚠ The absence of any active outlets indicates the franchise is either pre-launch or completely inactive, representing a significant risk for prospective franchisees. ⚠ Furthermore, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of the business model's profitability, making this a highly speculative opportunity despite the clean legal record.

Angus Valley Montessori presents a high-barrier entry model with a total investment ranging from $1.9M to $3M and a premium $80,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The complete absence of operating outlets and the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure represent significant risks for prospective investors evaluating the concept's viability. ⚠ With zero growth trajectory last year, this appears to be a startup franchise opportunity lacking the proven scale and historical performance data typically required to justify the substantial capital requirement.

Firesky Franchising, LLC presents a low-cost entry point with a $20,000 fee and competitive 2.0% royalty rate, though the total investment of $66k-$117k requires validation against the Item 19 financial performance data. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive indicator of corporate stability. ⚠ However, the complete lack of operational scale with 0 total outlets and 0 recent growth suggests this is an unproven, early-stage concept with high execution risk.

TruGolf Links presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $95,050 to $793,050, yet it currently lacks the operational history to validate the model. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive note regarding corporate background, but ⚠ the complete lack of open outlets and missing Item 19 financial performance data represent significant risks. ⚠ With zero units opened last year and no royalty structure listed, the franchise appears to be in a nascent or pre-launch phase with unproven market traction.

Iris Galerie Franchising LLC currently exhibits zero operational scale with 0 total outlets and no growth recorded last year. ⚠ The 45.0% royalty rate is exceptionally high and will significantly pressure unit economics, despite a moderate total investment range of $113,000 to $395,000. ✓ The franchise offers financial transparency through an Item 19 disclosure and maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, though the lack of an established network remains a major risk.

INLIFE WELLNESS USA, LLC presents a high-barrier investment opportunity with a total cost ranging from $206,847 to $335,170, though the franchise offers a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓. The most critical red flag is the reported royalty rate of 2900%, which is likely a data error but requires immediate verification ⚠. Additionally, the system currently has zero total outlets and recorded no growth last year, indicating an unproven and potentially risky business trajectory ⚠.

Everyday Care Franchise, LLC presents a high-risk profile characterized by a complete lack of operational scale, with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the last year. ⚠ The franchise fee of $49,500 appears disproportionately high relative to the total investment of $53,347 - $56,697, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure removes any visibility into potential unit economics. ⚠ With no proven track record, no royalty structure listed, and no active franchisees, this concept remains entirely unproven in the market.

The Fashion Class Franchise LLC presents a specialized concept in fashion education, though it currently lacks the scale and historical performance data necessary for a comprehensive risk assessment. ⚠ The total investment of $139,900 to $247,450 is moderate, but the 8.0% royalty fee is relatively high given the absence of an Item 19 to validate potential returns. ⚠ Critical data regarding outlet counts, openings, and closures is listed as N/A, signaling a lack of transparency or an unproven operational track record. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean legal record with no history of litigation or bankruptcy.

The Sweet Spot Franchise, LLC presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $332,100 to $1,108,000. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant risk for prospective investors, particularly given the steep capital requirements and lack of operational history implied by missing outlet data. ⚠ With no data available regarding open or closed units, the franchise lacks a verifiable track record of scale or growth trajectory.

California Pools Franchise presents an exceptionally low barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $8,000 to $90,000 and zero initial franchise fees ✓. The 4.0% royalty rate is competitive, though the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents a clear assessment of potential earnings ⚠. Additionally, the absence of scale data and growth metrics makes it difficult to gauge the system's stability and trajectory ⚠.

Krak Boba Franchising presents a high barrier to entry with a franchise fee of $49,500 and a total investment ranging up to $471,833, which is aggressive given the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation. ⚠ The absence of outlet count data and growth metrics makes it impossible to verify the brand's scale or market traction. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face significant risk investing in this concept without validated earnings data or a proven operational history.

The Braiding School presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity with a total estimated cost ranging from $1 million to over $2 million, which is steep given the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation. ⚠ The absence of scale data and growth metrics makes it difficult to assess the brand's current market traction or operational stability. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean legal record with no history of litigation or bankruptcy, and the 4.0% royalty fee is standard for the industry. Prospective investors must rely heavily on the value of the brand name alone, as there is no financial transparency or unit count data to validate the business model.

PalgongTea Franchising, LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a franchise fee of $20,000 and a total investment ranging from $147,500 to $185,700 ✓. The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback, as it prevents prospective franchisees from validating the brand's earning potential ⚠. Additionally, the lack of data regarding total outlets and recent unit growth makes it difficult to assess the system's scale and market traction ⚠.

Artichoke Franchising LLC presents a high-barrier entry point with a total investment ranging from $353,000 to over $1 million, positioning it as a premium or capital-intensive opportunity. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant drawback, as it prevents prospective franchisees from validating the business's profitability or potential return on investment. ⚠ A complete lack of data regarding unit counts, royalties, and recent growth activity further obscures the franchise's scale and market trajectory, making this a high-risk proposition without further transparency.

GTS Franchise, LLC presents an extremely low barrier to entry with a total investment of $33.6k-$53.7k ✓, though this is countered by a steep 20.0% royalty rate ⚠. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure represents a significant risk for ROI analysis ⚠, and the lack of scale or outlet data suggests this is likely an emerging or early-stage concept. Prospective franchisees should exercise caution given the limited operational history and absence of performance metrics.

The Wee Chippy presents a low-to-mid-range entry cost of $119,200 to $284,200, but the total outlet count is undisclosed, suggesting a lack of established scale. ⚠ Significant risks are present due to disclosed litigation and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, which prevents verification of potential returns. ⚠ The combination of missing growth data and a standard 6.0% royalty fee makes this a high-risk proposition for prospective franchisees seeking transparency.

This franchise presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $385,050 to $654,926, though it maintains a competitive 6.0% royalty rate and a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective investors from validating the earning potential or ROI of the business model. Furthermore, the lack of scale and missing data on outlet counts or recent growth makes it difficult to assess the brand's market traction and operational stability.

Krave Kobe Franchising presents a high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $494,000 to $694,000 ✓. The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback, as prospective franchisees cannot verify potential returns ⚠. Additionally, the lack of data regarding total outlets or recent unit growth suggests the concept may lack an established operational track record ⚠.

Lighting Squad Franchising LLC presents a low-to-mid market entry point with a total investment of $48,150 to $90,500 and a standard $30,000 fee. ⚠ The investment profile carries elevated risk due to the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation and a lack of transparency regarding unit scale or royalty structures. ⚠ The disclosure of active litigation further complicates the opportunity, signaling potential legal or operational instability for prospective franchisees.

DCAP Insurance/The Tax Zone presents a low barrier to entry with a modest $12,500 franchise fee and a total investment starting at $17,750 ✓. However, the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it difficult to assess potential returns ⚠. Additionally, the disclosure of active litigation introduces a risk factor that prospective franchisees must investigate carefully ⚠.

Dos Coyotes Development Company LLC presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $1.47M to $1.79M. ⚠ Significant risks are present due to the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation and the disclosure of ongoing litigation. ✓ The 5.0% royalty fee is standard for the sector, though the absence of scale data and unit growth figures makes it difficult to assess the brand's current trajectory.

Puffy Franchise LLC presents a moderate investment opportunity with a total cost ranging from $177,800 to $322,900 and a standard 6.0% royalty fee. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history offers initial credibility, though the lack of scale data makes it difficult to assess market penetration. ⚠ A critical risk is the missing Item 19 financial disclosure, which prevents prospective franchisees from verifying potential earnings or unit performance. ⚠ Additionally, the unavailability of outlet counts or growth figures suggests limited transparency regarding the system's current trajectory.

IQ Franchising, LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment of $47.5k-$128.7k and a competitive 4.0% royalty rate ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an assessment of potential ROI ⚠. Additionally, the lack of scale and missing outlet data suggest this is likely an unproven or early-stage concept with limited operating history ⚠.

We the Pizza presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity with a total cost ranging from $673,000 to $895,500. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant drawback for prospective franchisees attempting to validate potential returns against the steep capital requirement. ✓ The corporate structure appears stable with no reported litigation or bankruptcy history, though the lack of scale and operational data makes it difficult to assess the brand’s growth trajectory.

DL Franchise Group, LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a $5,000 franchise fee and a clean background regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓. However, the total investment is significant ($161,652 - $472,942) given the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, making it difficult to assess potential return on investment ⚠. Additionally, the lack of scale and missing outlet data prevents a thorough analysis of the system's growth trajectory or operational stability ⚠.

Liquid Capital of America Corp. presents a low-barrier entry into the financial services sector with a total investment of $46.8k to $84.5k and a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant drawback, as it prevents prospective franchisees from benchmarking potential earnings or validating the business model's efficiency. ⚠ Additionally, the lack of scale data and growth metrics makes it difficult to assess the franchise's current market traction or operational stability.

The Vitamin Shoppe presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from roughly $493,000 to $945,000, positioning it as a significant capital commitment in the health and wellness retail sector. ⚠ The investment profile is heavily weighed down by serious risk factors, specifically the disclosure of both active litigation and a history of bankruptcy, which raises concerns about the franchisor's stability and legal standing. ✓ The brand offers a standardized fee structure with a $25,000 franchise fee and 5% royalty, though the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it difficult for prospective franchisees to project potential returns. ⚠ Additionally, the lack of data regarding outlet counts and unit growth suggests an inability to accurately assess the system's current scale or trajectory.

The BrickKicker offers an exceptionally low barrier to entry with a total investment starting at $8,750 and a modest $7,000 franchise fee ✓. However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents verification of potential earnings, and the lack of scale or growth data suggests a very small operational footprint ⚠. Prospective franchisees should proceed with caution, as the low initial cost is counterbalanced by significant data transparency issues regarding system-wide performance ⚠.

Paniq Franchising, INC presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $350,000 to $3,000,000, suggesting a capital-intensive real estate and build-out model. ✓ The franchise offers a relatively accessible entry point regarding its $15,000 fee and maintains a clean record with no litigation or bankruptcy history. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an assessment of unit economics, and the lack of outlet data makes it impossible to verify the system's scale or growth trajectory.

1-800 WATER DAMAGE International presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a substantial $59,000 franchise fee and a heavy 10% royalty structure, which demands high revenue volumes to ensure unit profitability. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents a data-driven assessment of potential returns, creating significant risk for prospective investors. ⚠ Critical data regarding the total outlet count and unit growth trajectory is unavailable, making it impossible to verify the system's health or market traction.

Phyziquest Beauty Division LLC presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $102,400 to $196,900 and a steep $34,900 franchise fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag for prospective investors, particularly given the lack of operational history or scale data. ⚠ With no available metrics on outlet count or recent growth, the brand lacks the transparency and track record typically required to mitigate the substantial financial risk.

Chocolate Works presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $290,500 to $456,600, though the absence of scale data makes it difficult to assess market traction. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, and the 5.0% royalty fee is standard for the industry. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an objective evaluation of unit economics and potential return on investment. ⚠ Additionally, missing outlet counts and growth metrics suggest limited transparency regarding the system's current size and trajectory.