Companies
Column Legend (click to collapse)
Growth = (opened-closed)/total (20%+ hot, -10% shrinking)
AUV = Avg Unit Volume
%Achv = % achieving average
T = Terminations
NR = Non-Renewals
CO = Ceased Operations
Fail% = Failure rate (T+NR+CO)/total
Risk = Score 0-100 (0-29 low/30-59 med/60+ high)
19 = Has Item 19
L = Litigation
B = Bankruptcy
Tip: Select checkboxes to compare up to 6 franchises side-by-side
| Name | Industry | Files | Fee | Royalty | Investment | Outlets ▼ | Growth | AUV | Median | %Achv | T/NR/CO | Fail% | Risk | GM/EB | Flags | Updated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | Food & Beverage | 20 |
$40K
|
7.0%
|
$1.3M–$4.0M
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 50 | — | L B | 1 month | ||
|
Larks LLC presents a high-risk profile with zero total outlets and no financial performance disclosure (Item 19), making it impossible to validate any revenue or profitability projections. The franchise requires a substantial total investment of $1.3M to $4.0M with a $40,000 fee and 7% royalty, yet has no operating history or growth trajectory to justify this cost. ⚠ Significant red flags include both litigation and bankruptcy filings, which raise serious concerns about the franchisor's financial stability and legal standing. Without any opened or closed outlets in the past year, this opportunity lacks the track record necessary for informed investment decisions.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| L | Hospitality | 244 |
$100K–$150K
|
5.0%
+2.5%ad
|
$1.4M
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
LXR presents a high-risk, unproven investment with zero total outlets and no historical openings or closures, indicating it is a pre-revenue concept. The franchise fee is steep at $100,000, and the total investment range is exceptionally wide ($1.4M to $64.9M), suggesting a lack of operational standardization. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data means there is no verifiable track record for prospective franchisees to evaluate potential earnings. ✓ Positively, there is no litigation or bankruptcy history, but the complete lack of scale and growth trajectory makes this a speculative venture.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Fitness & Wellness | 1 |
$55K
|
8.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$713K–$1.2M
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
CorePlus is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the past year, indicating it has not yet launched any operational units. The total investment range of $713,200 to $1,198,500 is substantial for a concept with no proven track record, and the 8% royalty fee is relatively high. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data means there is no historical evidence of unit-level profitability or revenue to evaluate. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of operational scale makes this a high-risk, unproven investment opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Child Services | 1 |
$80K
|
7.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$1.9M–$3.0M
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Angus Valley Montessori is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets opened, closed, or transferred since inception, presenting a complete lack of operational proof-of-concept. The total investment range of $1.89M to $3.03M is exceptionally high for an unproven concept, and the $80,000 franchise fee with a 7% royalty offers no track record to justify the cost. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance representations means prospective franchisees cannot evaluate any revenue or profitability expectations, which is a significant risk for such a capital-intensive venture. ✓ No litigation or bankruptcy history provides a clean legal slate, but the franchise's viability remains entirely speculative without any operating units or financial disclosures.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| R | Hospitality | 13 |
$20K
|
5.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$212K–$2.0M
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Restpoint Inn is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the last year, indicating it has not yet launched or proven its concept. The total investment range is exceptionally wide at $211,875 to $1,986,445, suggesting significant variability in build-out or real estate costs, while the $20,000 franchise fee and 5% royalty are moderate. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no historical performance data for prospective franchisees to evaluate, which is a major risk for a brand with no operating track record. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral positive, but the franchise remains an unproven, high-risk opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| D | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$40K
|
5.0%
+1.5%ad
|
$502K–$1.2M
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 30 | — | 19 B | 1 month | ||
|
DJ Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk profile with zero total outlets and no recent openings or closures, indicating it is a pre-revenue concept with no proven operational track record. The substantial total investment range of $501,500 to $1,194,220, coupled with a $40,000 franchise fee and 5.0% royalty, demands significant capital for an unproven system. ⚠ A prior bankruptcy filing is a major red flag, raising concerns about the franchisor's financial stability and management history. ✓ While the absence of litigation is a positive, the lack of any operating units and a bankruptcy record make this an exceptionally speculative opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| T | Real Estate | 5 |
$10K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$39K–$168K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
TitleEase is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the last year, indicating it has not yet launched any operational units. The total investment range of $38,500 to $167,900 is relatively low, but the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ means there is no validated data on unit economics or profitability for prospective franchisees. The lack of litigation and bankruptcy filings is a neutral factor ✓, but the complete lack of operating history and financial performance data makes this a high-risk, unproven concept. Without any track record or peer performance to evaluate, potential investors are essentially funding a startup business model with no demonstrated market validation.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Home Services | 5 |
$40K
|
6.0%
|
$140K–$337K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Stiltz Franchising, Inc. enters the market with no operating history, having opened and closed zero outlets last year, which presents a significant ⚠ risk as there is no proven unit-level performance or brand traction. The total investment range of $139,800 to $336,500 is moderate, but the absence of Item 19 financial disclosure means prospective franchisees cannot validate revenue or profitability expectations. While the franchise carries no litigation or bankruptcy baggage, the complete lack of scale and growth trajectory makes this a speculative venture. ✓ The clean legal record is a minor positive, but the core warning is the franchise is essentially a concept without any operational proof.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| G | Fitness & Wellness | 2 |
$24K
|
8.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$85K–$154K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Greenlight Personal Training is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets opened or closed, indicating it has not yet launched any operational units. The total investment range of $85,050 to $153,550 is relatively low for a fitness concept, but the 8.0% royalty is high for a brand with no proven track record. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data means there is no historical evidence of unit-level profitability or revenue to evaluate. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of operational history makes this a high-risk, unproven investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Business Services | 2 |
$5K
|
— | — |
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Bucqi USA, LLC presents a micro-investment opportunity with a total investment range of $9,500 to $20,900 and a low $5,000 franchise fee, but it has zero total outlets and no operating history, making it a pre-revenue concept. ✓ The absence of any litigation or bankruptcy filings is a clean slate. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit economics or profitability. ⚠ With no outlets opened or closed in the last year, the brand has no proven growth trajectory or operational track record, representing a high-risk venture for early adopters.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$25K
|
3.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$168K–$248K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Chungchun Franchise, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a brand-new concept with zero total outlets, no operating history, and no Item 19 financial performance data for prospective franchisees to evaluate. ⚠ The total investment range of $168,000 to $248,000 is significant for an unproven system, though the 3.0% royalty is relatively low. ✓ There are no litigation or bankruptcy filings, which is a clean start, but the complete absence of any opened or closed outlets means there is no track record of unit-level success or failure. This franchise is essentially a theoretical business model, requiring extreme caution from any potential investor.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| H | Other | 1 |
$35K–$110K
|
7.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$217K–$411K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
HardHatRentals.com Franchising, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a startup franchise with zero total outlets and no operating history, making its business model entirely unproven. The initial investment range of $217,200 to $411,000 is substantial for a concept with no track record, and the 7% royalty fee adds significant ongoing cost without any Item 19 financial performance data to validate potential returns. ⚠ The complete absence of any opened or closed outlets, combined with no financial disclosures, offers no basis for assessing unit-level economics or market demand. This franchise is essentially a pre-revenue concept asking for a significant capital commitment, which is a major red flag for prospective franchisees.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$40K–$100K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$238K–$524K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Blue Burro Franchise, LLC presents a high-risk profile as a startup concept with zero total outlets opened and no operational history to validate its business model. The franchise fee of $40,000 and total investment range of $237,700 to $524,325 are substantial for an unproven system. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance disclosures means prospective franchisees cannot assess potential earnings or unit-level economics. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history offers a clean legal slate, but the complete lack of growth or closures provides no track record for success or failure.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| I | Education & Training | 1 |
$60K
|
10.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$78K–$119K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
International Forwarding Academy Inc. operates with zero total outlets and no growth trajectory, having opened and closed no locations in the last year. The franchise requires a $60,000 fee and a 10% royalty, with a total investment range of $77,750 to $118,500. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as it prevents prospective franchisees from evaluating any historical financial performance. This concept presents a high-risk, unproven opportunity with no operational track record to assess viability.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Cleaning & Restoration | 1 |
$4K–$69K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
— |
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
M & R Cleaning Solutions LLC presents a highly affordable entry point into the commercial cleaning sector, featuring a low $3,600 franchise fee and a minimal 5.0% royalty rate ✓. However, the complete absence of open outlets and zero growth last year indicate this is an unproven, emerging brand with no established market presence ⚠. Additionally, the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it impossible for prospective franchisees to evaluate potential return on investment ⚠. While the clean legal record is a positive factor ✓, potential investors must be highly cautious of the severe lack of scale and historical performance data ⚠.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Retail | 2 |
$10K–$25K
|
— |
$233K–$279K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 30 | — | B | 1 month | ||
|
Cook Space, LLC presents a high-risk profile as a pre-revenue concept with zero total outlets and no financial performance disclosure in Item 19. The total investment range of $233,000 to $279,000 is substantial for an unproven franchise, and the $10,000 franchise fee offers no operational track record. ⚠ A significant red flag is the bankruptcy history, which raises serious concerns about the franchisor's financial stability and business model viability. ✓ The absence of litigation is a minor positive, but it does little to offset the lack of scale, growth, or any operational history.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| I | Retail | 4 |
$45K
|
2.0%
+0.3%ad
|
$920K–$3.2M
|
0
+1
|
+1
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
India Bazaar LLC is a nascent franchise with zero total outlets and only one opened in the last year, indicating it is in the very early stages of development. The investment is substantial, ranging from $919,500 to over $3.2 million, with a $45,000 franchise fee and a low 2.0% royalty. ⚠ A major red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial performance data, making it impossible to assess unit-level economics or validate the business model. ✓ On the positive side, there is no litigation or bankruptcy history, and no closures were reported in the prior year.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| U | Food & Beverage | 6 |
$50K
|
6.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$384K–$1.6M
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Ugly Dumpling presents a high-risk investment profile with zero total outlets and no operational history, making it a concept without any proven market traction. The franchise fee of $50,000 and total investment range of $384,450 to $1,601,850 are substantial for an unproven brand, and the absence of Item 19 financial disclosures ⚠ means there is no data on potential earnings or unit performance. With no outlets opened or closed in the last year, the franchise shows no growth trajectory, and while there is no litigation or bankruptcy history, the lack of any existing locations is a significant red flag. This opportunity is essentially a startup concept requiring a high capital commitment with no validation from existing franchisees.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| P | Food & Beverage | 8 |
$15K
|
4.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$931K–$2.0M
|
0
|
|
— | $2.1M | 43% | 0/0/0 | — | 30 |
52%gm
|
19 B | 1 month | ||
|
Pizzaexpress US Limited presents a high-risk profile with zero total outlets and no recent openings or closures, indicating it has not yet launched operations in the U.S. market. The total investment range of $930,847 to $1,955,672 is substantial for a new concept, and the $15,000 franchise fee with a 4.0% royalty is moderate. ⚠ A significant red flag is the bankruptcy history, which raises concerns about financial stability and prior business failure. ✓ The absence of litigation and presence of Item 19 financial disclosure provide some transparency, but the lack of operational track record makes this a speculative investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| P | Food & Beverage | 5 |
$40K
|
6.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$536K–$1.2M
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 50 | — | L B | 1 month | ||
|
Pilar Operations is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the past year, indicating it has not yet launched any operational units. The total investment range of $536,200 to $1,169,000 is substantial for a concept with no proven track record, and the absence of Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no historical performance data for prospective franchisees to evaluate. ⚠ Significant red flags include both litigation and bankruptcy disclosures, which raise serious concerns about the franchisor's financial stability and legal history. ✓ The $40,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty are standard, but without any operating locations or financial benchmarks, this opportunity carries exceptionally high risk.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| L | Automotive | 1 |
$2K–$25K
|
10.0%
|
$130K–$196K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Luxury Limo Group, LLC is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no historical openings or closures, indicating it has not yet proven its business model or market viability. The low $2,000 franchise fee and moderate total investment range of $129,700 to $195,500 suggest a relatively accessible entry point, but the 10.0% royalty is high for a concept with no operational track record. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance representations means prospective franchisees cannot assess potential earnings, a significant risk for a brand with no existing units. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of scale and growth trajectory makes this a highly speculative opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| E | Food & Beverage | 4 |
$40K
|
8.0%
+4.5%ad
|
$202K–$312K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
EGGDROP Corp. presents a high-risk profile as a startup franchise with zero total outlets, no operating history, and no Item 19 financial disclosure, making it impossible to validate any revenue or profitability claims. ⚠ The $40,000 franchise fee and 8% royalty are steep for an unproven concept, especially given the $201,500–$311,500 total investment range, which is substantial for a brand with no track record. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a neutral point, but the complete lack of growth—no outlets opened or closed—suggests the franchise has yet to launch or attract any franchisees. This franchise should be approached with extreme caution until it demonstrates real-world performance and provides transparent financial data.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Fitness & Wellness | 2 |
$10K
|
8.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$155K–$458K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
MD Clinic Systems, LLC is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the past year, indicating it has not yet launched operations. The total investment range of $155,000 to $458,000 is moderate, but the 8% royalty is relatively high for a concept with no proven track record. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no validated performance data for prospective franchisees to evaluate. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of operational history makes this a high-risk, unproven opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| E | Health & Medical | 1 |
$50K
|
0.0%
|
$53K–$57K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Everyday Care Franchise, LLC presents a significant risk profile as a brand with zero total outlets and no operational history, making it a pre-revenue concept with no proven market traction. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit economics, earnings potential, or franchisee performance, which is a critical red flag for prospective investors. ✓ The relatively low total investment range of $53,347 to $56,697 and the lack of ongoing royalty fees reduce financial commitment, but this is overshadowed by the $49,500 franchise fee for an unproven system. ⚠ With no outlets opened or closed in the last year, the franchise has no growth trajectory or track record to evaluate, leaving investors to rely entirely on the franchisor's projections without any historical validation.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| D | Health & Medical | 2 |
$50K
|
7.0%
|
$105K–$105K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Dr. Goodguy Family Health Centers, LLC presents a high-risk profile as a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets opened and no financial performance disclosure in Item 19, making it impossible to validate any earnings potential. The total investment is fixed at $105,000 with a $50,000 franchise fee and a 7% royalty, which is a steep cost for an unproven concept. ⚠ The absence of any operating units, combined with no litigation or bankruptcy history, suggests the brand has never been tested in the market, leaving franchisees as de facto pioneers with no track record to assess. ⚠ This venture is essentially a startup business model being sold as a franchise, carrying extreme uncertainty for prospective investors.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$35K
|
4.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$149K–$284K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Mariam Coffee Franchise, LLC presents a significant risk profile as a pre-revenue concept with zero total outlets opened, closed, or in operation. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit economics, sales performance, or profitability for prospective franchisees. The total investment range of $149,000 to $283,500, combined with a $35,000 franchise fee and 4% royalty, is substantial for an unproven brand with no operating history. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy filings is a neutral factor, but the complete lack of operational scale makes this a high-risk, speculative investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Cleaning & Restoration | 1 |
$16K
|
8.0%
+5.0%ad
|
$29K–$92K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
A.C.E. Janitorial Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk profile as a brand-new franchise with zero total outlets and no operating history to validate its business model. The low total investment range of $28,745 to $91,795 is accessible, but the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no audited data on potential earnings or unit performance. ⚠ The lack of any opened or closed outlets provides no track record for growth or stability, making it impossible to assess franchisee success or failure rates. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a neutral positive, but the unproven concept and missing financial performance representation are significant red flags for prospective investors.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Senior Care | 2 |
$0K–$25K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$110K–$277K
|
0
0F
/
2C
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Seva Senior Home Care Services is a brand-new franchise with zero total outlets opened, closed, or in operation, presenting a complete lack of operational track record. ✓ The franchise fee is $0, and the total investment range of $109,500 to $277,000 is moderate for a home care concept, with a 5.0% royalty. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no validated data on unit economics, revenue, or profitability for prospective franchisees. ⚠ This venture carries extreme risk as it is an unproven model with no existing locations to demonstrate market viability or system performance.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Home Services | 1 |
$10K
|
8.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$30K–$90K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Service Star Painters is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the last year, indicating it has not yet launched any operational units. The low total investment range of $29,987 to $89,987 and a modest franchise fee of $9,987 make it one of the most affordable entry points in the painting sector. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no verifiable data on unit economics, revenue, or profitability, which is a significant risk for prospective franchisees. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of operational history and financial performance data makes this a high-risk, unproven concept.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$20K
|
1.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$285K–$596K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Auntea Jenny is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets opened or closed, presenting a high-risk profile for early adopters. The total investment range of $285,000 to $596,000 is substantial for a concept with no proven operating history or financial performance disclosure (no Item 19). ⚠ The absence of any unit growth or validation data makes it impossible to assess real-world demand or profitability. ✓ The low 1.0% royalty fee is attractive, but this is overshadowed by the lack of any track record, making due diligence critical.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| J | Food & Beverage | 7 |
$35K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$209K–$646K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Jars by Fabio Viviani is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets opened or closed, presenting a high-risk, unproven business model. The total investment range of $209,000 to $645,500 is substantial for a concept with no operational history or Item 19 financial disclosure, making it impossible to assess potential profitability. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a neutral positive, but ⚠ the lack of any operating units and financial performance data is a significant red flag for prospective franchisees. This offering is essentially a startup concept with a $35,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty, requiring investors to be comfortable with pioneering an untested brand.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$49K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$329K–$598K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Better Gourmet Health Kitchen is a pre-revenue concept with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the past year, indicating it has not yet proven its operational viability. The total investment range of $328,545 to $597,757 is substantial for an unproven brand, and the $49,000 franchise fee is high relative to its lack of scale. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no validated data on unit economics, revenue, or profitability for prospective franchisees to evaluate. ✓ The franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, but the complete lack of operating history and financial performance data presents significant risk for early adopters.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| A | Food & Beverage | 7 |
$50K
|
4.0%
|
$405K–$521K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
A Qin LLC is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the past year, indicating it has not yet proven its concept in the market. The total investment range of $404,850 to $520,700 is substantial for an unproven brand, and the $50,000 franchise fee is high relative to its lack of operational history. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data means there is no verifiable earnings information for prospective franchisees to evaluate. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy filings provides a clean legal slate, but the core risk remains the franchise's complete lack of scale and track record.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| G | Health & Medical | 4 |
$40K
|
11.0%
|
$71K–$350K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
G.TEC NEUROTECHNOLOGY USA, INC. presents a high-risk profile with zero total outlets and no growth trajectory, as no outlets opened or closed in the last year. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial disclosures leaves franchisees without any validated earnings data, making revenue projections speculative. ✓ The moderate franchise fee of $40,000 and total investment range of $71,000 to $349,500 are reasonable, but the 11% royalty is steep for a concept with no proven market presence. ⚠ Without any operating units or litigation history, this is essentially an untested business model, requiring extreme caution from potential investors.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| P | Food & Beverage | 5 |
$35K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$255K–$481K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Puradak is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the past year, indicating it has not yet launched any operational units. The total investment range of $255,000 to $481,000 is substantial for a concept with no proven track record, and the absence of Item 19 financial performance data ⚠ means prospective franchisees cannot assess any historical revenue or profitability. While there is no litigation or bankruptcy history ✓, the lack of any operating locations and financial disclosure presents a high-risk, unproven investment opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| E | Home Services | 2 |
$50K
|
6.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$132K–$270K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
EGL California, LP operates with zero total outlets and no recent openings or closures, indicating it is either a pre-launch concept or a dormant franchise. The total investment range of $132,300 to $269,750 is moderate, but the $50,000 franchise fee is relatively high for a system with no proven track record. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no validated data on unit economics or franchisee earnings, which is a significant risk for prospective investors. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral point, but the complete lack of operational scale makes this a speculative opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| E | Home Services | 1 |
$50K–$125K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$109K–$266K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
EnviroLogik LLC is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets opened or closed, indicating it has not yet launched any operational units. The franchise fee of $49,500 and total investment range of $108,675 to $265,840 represent a moderate entry cost, but the absence of Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no validated performance data for prospective franchisees to evaluate. ⚠ The lack of any operating history or growth trajectory, combined with no litigation or bankruptcy, suggests the brand is in its earliest development stage, carrying significant uncertainty. This franchise should be approached with extreme caution until it demonstrates real-world viability and provides transparent financial performance.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| E | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$35K
|
4.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$337K–$585K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
EBIGA Jjamppong is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the last year, indicating it has not yet proven its concept in the market. The total investment range of $337,000 to $585,000 is substantial for an unproven brand, and the absence of Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ means there is no validated data on potential earnings or franchisee performance. While the franchise fee of $35,000 and 4% royalty are moderate, the lack of any operational history or financial performance data presents significant risk for prospective franchisees. Without any litigation or bankruptcy history ✓, the primary concern is the brand's complete lack of track record and the high upfront cost relative to its unvalidated business model.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| J | Health & Medical | 1 |
$30K–$70K
|
— |
$149K–$240K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 20 | — | 19 L | 1 month | ||
|
JTT Health Management, LLC is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the last year, indicating it has not yet launched any operational units. The total investment range of $148,600 to $240,100 is moderate, but the absence of a royalty fee is unusual and may signal an unproven or incomplete business model. ⚠ A significant red flag is the presence of litigation, which raises concerns about legal or operational risks before any franchise network has been established. ✓ The inclusion of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a positive, but without any operating history or unit growth, the data offers no track record for prospective franchisees to evaluate.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| S | Home Services | 8 |
$60K–$149K
|
8.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$178K–$912K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Subcontain, LLC presents a significant risk profile as a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets opened or closed, indicating no operational track record. The franchise fee of $59,500 and 8.0% royalty are high for a concept with no proven unit economics, and the total investment range of $177,800 to $911,600 is substantial without any Item 19 financial performance disclosure. ⚠ The absence of any historical data, combined with the lack of financial projections, makes it impossible to assess viability or return on investment. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a neutral factor, but it does not offset the fundamental risk of investing in an unproven franchise system.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| U | Food & Beverage | 2 |
$15K–$100K
|
6.0%
+3.0%ad
|
$284K–$679K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
UG is a startup franchise with zero total outlets and no operating history, presenting a high-risk profile. The total investment range of $283,500 to $679,200 is substantial for an unproven concept, and the absence of Item 19 financial disclosures means there is no data to validate potential earnings. ⚠ The lack of any outlet openings or closures in the past year suggests the brand has not yet launched or is stalled in development. ✓ On the positive side, there is no litigation or bankruptcy history, but the franchise fee of $15,000 and 6% royalty are standard for an unestablished system.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| N | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$50K
|
5.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$627K–$1.5M
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Nana's Green Tea enters the U.S. market with no existing outlets, presenting a blank slate for growth but also a complete lack of operational proof. The total investment range of $627,400 to $1,508,400 is substantial, especially given the $50,000 franchise fee and 5.0% royalty. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data means prospective franchisees cannot assess unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. ✓ The clean legal history with no litigation or bankruptcy is a positive, but the zero-unit track record makes this a high-risk, unproven concept for investors.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Food & Beverage | 1 |
$35K
|
5.0%
+1.0%ad
|
$336K–$584K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Bobae Global, Inc. (Bobaebanjum) is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets, zero openings, and zero closures, indicating it has not yet launched any operational units. The total investment range of $335,500 to $583,500 is substantial for a brand with no proven track record, and the $35,000 franchise fee is high relative to the lack of market validation. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no data on potential earnings or performance, which is a significant risk for prospective franchisees. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of operational history makes this a high-risk, speculative investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| N | Fitness & Wellness | 2 |
$25K
|
— |
$124K–$274K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 20 | — | L | 1 month | ||
|
NutriMost Wellness & Weight Loss, LLC operates with zero total outlets, indicating it is a pre-revenue concept with no proven operational track record. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data and the presence of litigation are significant red flags, as prospective franchisees cannot evaluate unit economics or legal risk. ⚠ The total investment range of $124,497 to $273,997 is substantial for a brand with no open locations, and the $24,997 franchise fee offers no established network value. ✓ The lack of any closures or bankruptcies provides a neutral baseline, but the complete lack of scale and financial disclosure makes this a high-risk, unproven opportunity.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| H | Health & Medical | 1 |
$15K
|
6.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$428K–$795K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Hello Skin is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the last year, making it an unproven concept with no operational track record. The total investment range of $428,365 to $794,578 is substantial for a brand with no existing locations, presenting a high-risk entry point. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data means there is no validated earnings information for prospective franchisees to evaluate. ✓ On the positive side, the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, though this is less meaningful given the complete lack of operational history.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| B | Food & Beverage | 16 |
$35K
|
5.5%
+3.0%ad
|
$450K–$698K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 20 | — | L | 1 month | ||
|
Buffalo Wings & Rings currently operates zero outlets, indicating a complete operational shutdown or a brand in the process of relaunching, with no new openings or closures in the last year. The total investment range of $449,750 to $698,342 is substantial for a concept with no proven operating footprint. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data and the presence of litigation are significant red flags, offering no historical revenue or profitability benchmarks for prospective franchisees. ✓ The lack of bankruptcy filings provides a minor positive, but the overall profile suggests extreme caution is warranted given the brand's dormant state and lack of financial disclosure.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| M | Fitness & Wellness | 3 |
$75K
|
8.0%
+2.0%ad
|
$293K–$516K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Manduu America, LLC presents a high-risk profile as a startup franchise with zero total outlets, no historical openings or closures, and no Item 19 financial disclosure to validate performance. The initial investment range of $292,950 to $515,550 is substantial for an unproven concept, and the 8% royalty adds ongoing cost pressure without any track record of unit profitability. ⚠ The absence of any operating locations means there is no proof of concept or peer network for franchisees to rely on. ✓ On the positive side, the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, but the lack of scale and financial data makes this a speculative investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| T | Other | 3 |
$75K
|
— |
$95K–$793K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Trugolf Links Franchising is a pre-revenue concept with zero total outlets, zero openings, and zero closures in the last year, indicating no operational track record. The franchise fee is steep at $75,000, and the total investment range of $95,050 to $793,050 is unusually wide, suggesting significant uncertainty in build-out costs. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no validated data on unit economics, revenue, or profitability for prospective franchisees. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of scale and financial performance data makes this a high-risk, unproven investment.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| C | Food & Beverage | 3 |
$20K–$69K
|
7.0%
|
$23K–$298K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | — | 1 month | ||
|
Combo Kitchen is a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no openings or closures in the past year, indicating it has not yet proven its concept in the market. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy provides a clean legal slate, but ⚠ the lack of Item 19 financial disclosure means there is no validated performance data for prospective franchisees to evaluate. ⚠ The total investment range of $22,550 to $298,000 is unusually wide, suggesting significant uncertainty in build-out or operational costs, while the 7.0% royalty is standard for the industry. This franchise carries high risk due to its unproven track record and absence of financial transparency, making it suitable only for investors willing to pioneer an untested brand.
|
||||||||||||||||||
| I | Retail | 1 |
$35K
|
— |
$113K–$395K
|
0
|
|
— | — | — | 0/0/0 | — | 0 | — | 19 | 1 month | ||
|
Iris Galerie Franchising LLC presents a highly unusual financial structure characterized by a low $35,000 franchise fee but an exceptionally high 45.0% royalty rate. ✓ The total initial investment remains relatively accessible at $113,000 to $395,000, and the franchise maintains a clean legal record with no history of bankruptcy or litigation. ⚠ However, the complete absence of operational scale—with zero total outlets and zero growth last year—indicates an unproven, pre-revenue business model. ⚠ While the brand does provide financial performance representations (Item 19), prospective franchisees must exercise extreme caution given the untested market presence and the severe profit margin constraints inherent to the 45% royalty.
|
||||||||||||||||||