Companies

Fly To Fit Franchise, LLC is a nascent concept with only a single outlet and zero net unit growth in the past year, indicating no proven expansion model. ✓ The total investment range of $94,200 to $183,500 is relatively low, and the absence of litigation or bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal history. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as prospective franchisees have no validated data on unit-level revenue or profitability. This franchise presents a high-risk, unproven opportunity that requires extensive independent validation before any commitment.

Jomaru Korean Hot Pot is a nascent franchise with only a single outlet, having opened one location in the past year with no closures, indicating a clean but unproven operational track record. The total investment range of $349,500 to $590,000 is substantial for a concept with no Item 19 financial disclosure, presenting a significant risk as prospective franchisees cannot verify unit-level profitability. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive signal for the brand's legal standing. ⚠ However, the lack of financial performance data and the very small scale make this a high-risk, early-stage opportunity that requires extensive independent validation.

Bigshots Holdco, LLC operates on a minuscule scale with only a single outlet, which opened in the past year, indicating it is a brand-new or extremely nascent concept. The franchise demands an exceptionally high total investment ranging from $8.5 million to over $12 million, coupled with an 8% royalty and a $125,000 franchise fee. ⚠ A critical red flag is the complete absence of Item 19 financial performance data, making it impossible to assess any potential return on this massive investment. ✓ On the positive side, the franchise has no history of litigation or bankruptcy, and it has not experienced any closures.

Binghamton HOTS is a micro-scale franchise with only a single outlet and zero net growth over the past year, indicating no proven expansion model. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a clean slate, but the total investment range of $141,775 to $253,075 is relatively high for a concept with no operational track record beyond one location. ⚠ The $25,000 franchise fee and 5% royalty are standard, yet the lack of any new openings or closures suggests the business may be stagnant or still in a pilot phase. This franchise carries significant risk for investors seeking a proven system, as the financial disclosure (Item 19) exists but is backed by negligible unit-level data.

AleCall is a nascent franchise with only a single outlet and zero net unit growth in the past year, indicating no proven expansion model. The total investment range of $349,000 to $459,500 is substantial for a concept with no track record. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data makes it impossible to assess unit-level economics or validate the business model. ✓ The franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, but the high entry cost and lack of growth are significant concerns for prospective franchisees.

CW Designs Franchise, LLC is an extremely nascent operation with only a single outlet and zero unit growth in the past year, indicating no proven expansion model. The total investment range of $73,150 to $141,800 is relatively low, but the absence of Item 19 financial performance data ⚠ prevents any assessment of potential profitability or return on investment. While the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history ✓, the lack of any disclosed financial benchmarks and the stagnant unit count present significant risks for prospective franchisees. This concept remains largely unproven and should be approached with extreme caution.

DumplingGo Franchising Inc. is an extremely nascent concept with only a single outlet and zero net unit growth in the last year, indicating no proven expansion model. The total investment range of $161,000 to $600,000 is significant for a brand with no Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profitability data. ⚠ The absence of financial performance representations is a major red flag, as it prevents any assessment of unit economics or return on investment. ✓ While the franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, the lack of scale and growth makes this a high-risk, unproven opportunity.

PEAC Franchising, LLC operates a single outlet with no royalty fees, a low franchise fee of $12,000, and a modest total investment range of $57,250 to $89,000. ✓ The absence of litigation, bankruptcy, and any closures last year suggests a clean operational history. ⚠ However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any assessment of unit profitability or revenue potential, which is a significant risk for prospective franchisees. With only one unit and no growth in the past year, this is an unproven, nascent franchise concept with very limited validation.

Eliodoro Casa Mexico, Inc. operates a single unit with a very high total investment range of $826,000 to $1,752,000, positioning it as a capital-intensive, niche concept. ✓ The franchise reports a strong average unit volume (AUV) of $1,318,894 and has no litigation or bankruptcy history, indicating a clean legal record. ⚠ However, the brand has shown zero unit growth and zero closures in the last year, reflecting a complete stagnation in expansion. This combination of a high entry cost with no recent growth suggests a mature or non-scalable business model that carries significant financial risk for new franchisees.

Dirty Dough Franchising is a nascent concept with only one outlet and zero net growth in the last year, indicating no proven expansion model. ✓ The franchise fee is waived, but the total investment range of $157,250 to $338,000 is significant for a single-unit operator. ⚠ The presence of litigation is a notable red flag, and the 7.0% royalty fee adds ongoing cost pressure without a track record of unit-level success. This franchise carries high risk due to its lack of scale and legal issues.

Mobius Franchising, LLC presents a high-cost investment opportunity requiring $1.6M to $3.8M, which is offset by a strong AUV of $1,593,432 and a reasonable 5.0% royalty fee ✓. The franchise maintains a clean historical record with no litigation or bankruptcies ✓, though its current scale is highly limited with only one total outlet in operation ⚠. Furthermore, the complete lack of new openings last year indicates a stagnant growth trajectory and suggests the business model is currently unproven at scale ⚠.

Abbey Road Institute - ARI operates a single outlet with a very high franchise fee of $385,000 and total investment ranging from $1.4M to $1.8M, positioning it as a premium, niche opportunity. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial disclosures means there is no validated performance data for prospective franchisees to assess profitability. ✓ The franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, and reported zero outlet openings or closures in the last year, indicating a stagnant, non-growing system. This combination of a high entry cost, lack of financial transparency, and no recent expansion presents significant risk for investors.

Junk Raider Franchising LLC operates a single unit with a reported average unit volume (AUV) of $722,610, which is a strong revenue figure for a relatively low total investment range of $35,250 to $398,500. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy filings suggests a clean legal and financial standing. ⚠ However, the franchise has demonstrated zero net growth over the past year, with no new outlets opened and none closed, indicating a stalled expansion trajectory. The 8% royalty fee is standard, but the lack of any recent scaling raises concerns about the brand's ability to replicate its single-unit success.

Vincent's Clam Bar operates a single location with an exceptionally high average unit volume of $10.5 million, suggesting a proven and highly profitable business model. ✓ The total investment range of $1.6 to $2.2 million is substantial, placing it in the premium franchise tier, though the $35,000 franchise fee is relatively low. ⚠ The franchise has shown zero unit growth or closures in the past year, indicating a stagnant expansion phase with no new franchisees or exits. With no litigation or bankruptcy history, the brand appears stable, but the lack of any recent growth raises questions about scalability and franchisee demand.

Big Neck Jeff Franchise, Inc. operates a single unit with no recent openings or closures, indicating a nascent or stagnant system. The total investment range of $125,000 to $165,000 is relatively low, but the $70,000 franchise fee is high for such a small network. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or revenue potential. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a neutral positive, but the complete lack of growth trajectory makes this a high-risk, unproven opportunity.

Bubbly is a micro-scale franchise with only one total outlet and zero net growth over the past year, indicating no proven expansion model. ✓ The low franchise fee of $15,000 and total investment range starting under $50,000 make it accessible for first-time owners. ⚠ However, the absence of Item 19 financial performance data means there is no verifiable evidence of unit profitability or revenue potential. ⚠ The lack of any operating history or outlet growth presents a high-risk profile for prospective franchisees.

Mercato Cucina is a nascent franchise with only a single outlet and zero unit growth or closures in the past year, indicating no proven expansion model. The total investment range of $198,650 to $346,300 is moderate, but the absence of Item 19 financial performance data ⚠ prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or revenue potential. While the franchise carries no litigation or bankruptcy history ✓, the lack of any operating track record beyond a single location makes this a high-risk, unproven concept for prospective franchisees.

Kentro Franchising, LLC operates a single unit with no recent openings or closures, indicating a nascent or stagnant growth phase. ✓ The franchise reports a strong average unit volume of $997,409, but this is based on a single location, offering limited statistical reliability. ⚠ The total investment range of $387,800 to $896,800 is substantial, and with a $49,500 franchise fee and 6% royalty, the financial commitment is high relative to the unproven scalability of the concept. ✓ There are no litigation or bankruptcy issues, which is a positive sign, but the lack of expansion history presents a significant risk for prospective franchisees.

Waggles Puppies Franchising, LLC is a nascent operation with only one total outlet opened last year, presenting no proven multi-unit track record. ✓ The franchise reports a strong average unit volume of $985,541, but this is based on a single location, making the figure statistically unreliable. ⚠ A $50,000 franchise fee and total investment up to $677,500 are significant for a concept with no expansion history, and the presence of litigation is a notable red flag. The lack of closures is positive, but the absence of any growth beyond the initial unit suggests high risk for prospective franchisees.

Innovative Franchise Concepts, LLC presents a significant red flag with only one total outlet and zero growth over the past year, indicating no proven scalability or franchisee demand. ✓ The franchise does report a remarkably high average unit volume (AUV) of $7.4 million, but this single data point lacks reliability without a broader operational history. ⚠ The total investment range of $122,800 to $367,500 is moderate, yet the $50,000 franchise fee and 6% royalty are high for a concept with no expansion track record. The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is positive, but the lack of any new openings or closures suggests the business model has not been tested in a multi-unit environment.

Patsy's Italian Restaurant operates as a single-unit franchise with an exceptionally high entry barrier, requiring a total investment of $2.7M to $4M and a $100,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data and the presence of litigation are significant red flags for prospective franchisees. ✓ The brand has shown no recent growth or closures, indicating a stagnant, non-expanding system. This high-cost, low-transparency opportunity carries substantial risk with no proven financial track record to justify the investment.

2Good2B Franchising LLC operates a single outlet with a total investment range of $278,000 to $741,600, which is a significant capital commitment for a concept with no proven scalability. ✓ The franchise provides an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering some transparency, and has no litigation or bankruptcy history. ⚠ However, the brand has zero outlet growth in the past year, with no new openings and no closures, indicating a stagnant or pre-revenue stage that presents high risk for early adopters. The high franchise fee of $25,000 and 5% royalty further strain the value proposition given the lack of operational track record.

Foodtastic USA Inc. operates a single outlet with a wide total investment range of $163,300 to $849,500 and a 6.5% royalty, but the absence of Item 19 financial disclosure is a ⚠ significant red flag, as it prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or revenue expectations. The franchise has no litigation or bankruptcy history, yet the lack of any outlet growth data—with no openings or closures reported—suggests a ⚠ stagnant or nascent system with no proven track record. The high franchise fee of $35,000 relative to the minimal scale further raises concerns about value. Overall, this is a ⚠ high-risk opportunity due to its tiny footprint and complete lack of financial performance transparency.

Adolfo Management Group, Inc. operates a single unit with no recent growth, having opened and closed zero outlets last year, indicating a stagnant or nascent franchise system. The total investment range of $95,850 to $158,010 is relatively low, but the absence of Item 19 financial performance data ⚠ prevents any assessment of unit profitability or revenue potential. With no litigation or bankruptcy history ✓, the franchise appears clean legally, yet the lack of any expansion or operational track record beyond one location presents a significant risk for prospective franchisees.

Blank Mason is an extremely nascent franchise with only a single outlet and zero unit growth in the past year, indicating no proven replicability or expansion momentum. The total investment range of $231,350 to $596,350 is substantial for a concept with no operational track record beyond one location. ✓ The Item 19 disclosure shows a healthy average unit volume of $494,603, which provides a positive financial benchmark, but ⚠ the lack of any new openings or closures suggests the business model has not been tested for scalability. The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a neutral factor, but the extreme lack of scale makes this a high-risk, unproven investment.

Affordable Restaurant Service Holdings, LLC operates a single unit with a moderate total investment range of $97,500 to $150,900 and a $25,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability, while a prior bankruptcy filing represents a significant historical risk. ✓ The brand has no litigation history and reported no closures in the last year, but it also opened zero new outlets, indicating a complete lack of recent growth. This franchise is essentially a nascent concept with no proven expansion track record, making it a high-risk opportunity for prospective franchisees.

Vessel USA operates on a minimal scale with only 1 total outlet, which opened last year, indicating a nascent brand with no closure history. The total investment range of $288,930 to $327,038 is moderate, but the absence of Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant ⚠ risk, as it prevents validation of unit-level profitability or revenue. The $30,000 franchise fee and 5.0% royalty are standard, yet the lack of any litigation or bankruptcy provides a ✓ clean legal slate. Overall, this is a high-risk, unproven opportunity with no track record of financial performance or multi-unit growth.

Window-Fix LLC is a nascent franchise with only one total outlet and zero net growth in the past year, indicating no proven scalability or expansion momentum. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive, but the single-unit base offers no validation of a replicable system. ⚠ The total investment range of $101,450 to $156,000 is moderate, yet the reported average unit volume of over $7.5 million appears extraordinarily high for a single location, warranting extreme scrutiny. This franchise presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of operational history and unverified financial claims.

The Picnic Collective Franchising LLC is an extremely nascent operation with only a single outlet and zero net growth in the last year, indicating no proven expansion model. ✓ The low total investment range of $39,200 to $95,300 and a modest 4.0% royalty make it one of the more affordable franchise opportunities available. ⚠ However, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as prospective franchisees have no validated data on revenue or profitability to assess the business's viability. This concept carries high risk due to its untested status and lack of financial transparency.

Social Play Haus Franchising, LLC operates a single unit with a high total investment range of $650,000 to over $1.25 million, making it a capital-intensive entry. ✓ The franchise reports a healthy average unit volume (AUV) of $676,346 and has no litigation or bankruptcy history. ⚠ However, the brand has zero net growth, with no new outlets opened or closed in the last year, indicating a stalled expansion. This nascent system presents significant risk for early adopters given its unproven scalability and high upfront costs.

Portal Franchising LLC operates a single outlet with a high franchise fee of $85,000 and a substantial total investment range of $386,250 to $2,860,000, which presents significant financial risk given the lack of proven scalability. ✓ The franchise provides an Item 19 disclosure showing an average unit volume of $860,253, offering some financial transparency. ⚠ However, the absence of any outlet openings or closures in the past year, combined with a total network of just one unit, indicates a stagnant or pre-growth stage with no track record of expansion. ✓ No litigation or bankruptcy history is a positive, but the high royalty of 7.5% further pressures margins in this unproven system.

Lukumades Franchise LLC is an extremely nascent concept with only one total outlet, which opened in the past year, and no closures, indicating a clean but unproven track record. The franchise fee is high at $75,000, and the total investment range of $96,250 to $474,000 is significant for a brand with zero operational history. ⚠ A major red flag is the presence of litigation and the complete absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, meaning there is no validated data on unit economics or profitability for prospective franchisees. ✓ The lack of a royalty fee is a notable positive, but the combination of a single unit, high entry cost, and undisclosed financial performance makes this a high-risk, speculative investment.

Bake Franchise, Inc. operates a single outlet with no growth in the past year, indicating a nascent or stalled concept. The total investment range of $423,000 to $619,500 is substantial for a brand with no Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving franchisees without validated performance data. ⚠ The absence of any unit openings or closures suggests a lack of operational track record, while the $40,000 franchise fee and 5% royalty add to the financial commitment without proven returns. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history is a neutral point, but the overall profile presents significant risk due to the unproven business model and high entry cost.

Assist U2 Build Development Company, Inc. operates a single outlet, indicating a nascent or extremely limited franchise system with no proven scalability. The total investment range of $48,500 to $214,000 is relatively low, but the 10% royalty is notable for a brand with no Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving franchisees without any validated performance data. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a clean slate, but ⚠ the lack of any outlet growth or closures over the past year suggests a stagnant or pre-revenue operation. This franchise presents a high-risk proposition due to its minimal footprint and complete absence of financial transparency.

Capital Laser Franchise, LLC operates on a very small scale with only one total outlet and no recent openings or closures, indicating a nascent or stagnant system. ✓ The franchise offers a disclosed average unit volume (AUV) of $1,460,366, which is strong, but the total investment range of $113,750 to $681,250 is wide, suggesting significant variability in setup costs. ⚠ The 7.0% royalty is standard, yet the lack of any growth over the past year raises concerns about the brand's expansion viability and market traction. With no litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary risk is the absence of a proven multi-unit track record for prospective franchisees.

Gold Medal Swim School Franchises, LLC is a nascent franchise with only one total outlet and zero openings or closures in the past year, indicating no proven growth trajectory. The total investment range of $552,500 to $1,146,000 is substantial for a brand with no Item 19 financial disclosure, which is a significant ⚠ risk for prospective franchisees. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive, but the high entry cost combined with a 6% royalty and no financial performance data makes this a speculative investment.

ARVO Solar Franchising, LLC is an extremely nascent franchise with only one total outlet and no disclosed outlet growth or closures, making it impossible to assess any operational track record or market validation. The total investment range of $80,350 to $144,650 is moderate, but the absence of a royalty fee is unusual and may indicate an unproven or non-standard business model. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a critical red flag, as it prevents any evaluation of unit-level revenue, profitability, or franchisee success. This franchise carries exceptionally high risk due to its minimal scale, zero transparency on financial performance, and no history of expansion.

Funtastik Franchising, LLC operates a single unit with no recent openings or closures, indicating a nascent or stagnant system. ✓ The franchise reports a healthy average unit volume of $542,146, but the total investment range of $257,250 to $352,250 is moderate, with an 8% royalty fee. ⚠ The lack of any growth or expansion activity over the past year raises concerns about scalability and brand momentum. ✓ No litigation or bankruptcy history provides a clean legal record, but the minimal scale offers limited validation for prospective franchisees.

Holy Sweet U.S.A., Inc. operates on a minimal scale with only one total outlet and zero net growth over the past year, indicating no expansion or franchisee traction. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance disclosures prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability, while the presence of litigation raises a significant red flag for prospective franchisees. The total investment range of $288,000 to $672,500 is substantial for a concept with no proven track record or disclosed earnings data. ✓ The absence of bankruptcy history provides a minor positive, but the combination of a single unit, no growth, and undisclosed financials makes this a high-risk opportunity.

AATB Franchise, LLC operates a single unit with no growth in the past year, indicating a nascent or stalled concept. ⚠ The absence of Item 19 financial performance data prevents any assessment of unit-level profitability or revenue potential. ✓ With no litigation or bankruptcy history, the brand carries a clean legal record, but the total investment range of $158,000 to $260,500 represents a moderate entry cost for a franchise with no proven expansion track record.

Lolo's CNW, LLC operates a single unit with a very high average unit volume of $3.9 million, suggesting strong top-line performance for a single location. ✓ The absence of litigation, bankruptcy, and any closures provides a clean operational history. ⚠ However, the total investment range of $651,000 to $2.2 million is substantial, and the franchise has shown zero unit growth in the past year, indicating no expansion momentum. This concept appears to be a high-revenue but high-cost, stagnant single-unit operation with no proven scalability.

JPD Franchising, LLC presents an exceptionally low-cost investment opportunity ranging from $137,600 to $244,000, highlighted by a strong AUV of $631,730 ✓. The franchise maintains a clean historical record with no reported litigation or bankruptcies ✓. However, the concept currently consists of only a single total outlet with zero new openings last year ⚠. This severe lack of scale and stagnant growth trajectory makes it difficult to assess the broader viability and replicability of the business model ⚠.

Funcation Station Franchising, LLC operates a single unit with a moderate total investment range of $67,127 to $174,558 and a franchise fee of $30,000. ✓ The franchise discloses a strong average unit volume (AUV) of $320,908, suggesting solid per-unit revenue potential. ⚠ However, the 8.0% royalty is relatively high, and the complete lack of any unit growth or closures over the past year indicates a stagnant, unproven concept with no expansion momentum. This is a high-risk, early-stage opportunity with no track record of scalability.

Döner and Gyros Franchising (USA), LLC is a nascent franchise with only one total outlet, which opened in the last year, indicating a complete lack of operational track record. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, as prospective franchisees have no validated data on unit-level revenue or profitability to assess the business model. ✓ The moderate initial investment range of $280,919 to $587,099 and a 6% royalty are standard for the fast-casual segment, but the high entry cost relative to a single-unit system presents substantial risk. This franchise is essentially a startup concept, and potential investors should treat it with extreme caution until a multi-unit history and financial performance data are available.

Disaster Blaster National, LLC operates as a single-unit franchise with a high average unit volume (AUV) of $609,413, which is a strong positive ✓ for existing performance. However, the franchise has demonstrated zero net growth over the past year, with no new outlets opened and no closures, indicating a stagnant expansion trajectory. The total investment range of $139,820 to $254,901 is moderate, but the $47,500 franchise fee and 6% royalty are notable costs relative to the single-unit scale. ⚠ The lack of any recent growth or litigation history suggests a stable but unproven franchise system with limited validation beyond its sole location.

Crush Yard Franchising, LLC is a nascent concept with only a single outlet and zero net unit growth in the past year, indicating no proven expansion track record. The franchise demands a very high total investment ranging from $6.5 million to nearly $10 million, coupled with a $95,000 franchise fee and a 6% royalty, yet it does not provide an Item 19 financial disclosure. ⚠ The absence of any financial performance representation is a significant red flag, as prospective franchisees cannot assess potential revenue or profitability for this substantial capital outlay. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history offers a clean legal slate, but the extreme cost and lack of financial data make this a high-risk, unproven investment.

Milk Jar Cookies (Unit) is a single-location franchise with a very high average unit volume (AUV) of $1,283,408, which is a strong ✓ revenue indicator. However, the total investment range of $327,545 to $750,770 is substantial for a concept with no proven multi-unit expansion, and the 7.0% royalty is on the higher side for a food brand. ⚠ The franchise has zero net growth—no new outlets opened or closed in the last year—suggesting a stalled or non-scaling system. With no litigation or bankruptcy history, the primary risk is the lack of any operational track record beyond a single unit.

Another Nine, LLC operates on a minimal scale with only one total outlet, which opened in the past year and saw no closures, indicating a nascent or single-unit operation. The franchise fee of $44,500 and total investment range of $267,450 to $397,350 represent a significant capital commitment for a concept with no proven multi-unit track record. ⚠ A major red flag is the absence of Item 19 financial performance data, leaving prospective franchisees without any validated revenue or profitability benchmarks. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history provides a clean legal slate, but the high investment cost relative to the single-unit base presents substantial risk.

EZ Plans Franchising, Inc. is a nascent operation with only a single outlet, presenting a high-risk profile due to a complete lack of proven scalability or growth trajectory, as it opened and closed zero units last year. ✓ The franchise offers a relatively low total investment range of $92,700 to $225,400 and has no litigation or bankruptcy history. ⚠ However, the disclosed average unit volume (AUV) of just $5,100 is critically low, suggesting minimal revenue generation, which is a major red flag for financial viability. The 7% royalty fee on such a small revenue base further strains the already questionable unit economics.

Gold Palm, LLC is an extremely nascent franchise with only a single outlet and zero unit growth or closures in the past year, indicating no proven expansion model. ✓ The total investment range of $72,650 to $140,490 is relatively low, and the franchise fee of $25,000 with a 4% royalty is modest. ⚠ However, the absence of Item 19 financial performance data is a significant red flag, as prospective franchisees have no validated earnings history to assess. This concept carries high risk due to its untested track record and lack of financial disclosure.