Companies

Lazzara Franchising LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, indicating a startup-level opportunity that lacks an established track record of franchise success. ⚠ The total investment is significant ($377,750 - $925,250) relative to the brand's maturity, presenting a high-risk entry point despite the clean legal history. ✓ With zero net growth last year, prospective franchisees should exercise caution, as the system offers no proof of concept or operational momentum.

Concordia Homecare Franchising presents a compelling but unproven value proposition, featuring a low total investment ($87,633 - $132,317) and strong Item 19 financial performance (AUV $1.57M). ✓ Despite the affordable entry point and clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, the network consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating a lack of established franchise traction. ⚠ Prospective buyers should approach with caution, as the system lacks the validation of a multi-unit operator base despite the high revenue potential.

Security Dash Franchising is currently a proof-of-concept stage operation with a single unit, presenting a high-risk profile despite strong initial performance metrics. ✓ The franchise demonstrates economic viability with a robust Average Unit Volume of $764,485 against a mid-range total investment of $113k-$260k. ⚠ However, the lack of any new outlets opened last year suggests the system has not yet validated its replication model or achieved growth traction. With a $60,000 franchise fee and 8.0% royalty, this opportunity requires significant caution due to the total absence of scale and operational history.

Lash Pilot presents a compelling unit-level economic model with an Average Unit Volume of $636,427, though this data point is currently derived from a single corporate outlet. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive indicator of operational stability, yet the lack of any franchise growth last year suggests the system is unproven at scale. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must weigh the strong initial revenue potential against the high-risk profile of investing in a concept with zero franchised footprint and a steep $40,000 fee.

House of Core is an early-stage franchise concept with a minimal footprint of one total outlet, making it a high-risk proof-of-concept investment requiring significant due diligence. ✓ The franchise offers a clean background with no litigation or bankruptcy history and provides an Item 19 financial disclosure to support potential returns. ⚠ However, the total investment of $211k–$325k is substantial for an unproven model, and the lack of historical scale means prospective franchisees are accepting the primary market-entry risk without operational validation.

305 Fitness Franchising Co. LLC presents a high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ The investment is capital-intensive, ranging from nearly $300k to $800k, yet the franchise lacks an Item 19 to substantiate potential returns and carries a disclosure for litigation. ⚠ With zero outlets opened or closed last year, the concept appears to be in total stagnation rather than active expansion.

Nomoo presents a compelling value proposition with an impressive Average Unit Volume of $1,398,241, suggesting strong unit-level economics despite a moderate total investment range. ✓ However, the concept is currently unproven at scale, operating with only a single total outlet and minimal growth history. ⚠ Prospective franchisees must weigh the robust financial performance data against the significant risks associated with a nascent, single-unit system.

Azuquita Franchising LLC presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of scale, operating as a concept with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure removes any ability to validate potential ROI, which is a critical red flag for new investors. ✓ While the franchise offers a low entry fee of $30,000 and a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, the total investment varies significantly up to $253,850. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution as they would be among the first investors in an unproven system.

Innovative Franchise Concepts, LLC presents a high-value opportunity characterized by an exceptionally strong Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $7.4 million ✓, though it currently lacks scale with only one total outlet ⚠. While the franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓, the absence of any new outlets opening last year suggests a nascent or potentially stagnant growth trajectory ⚠. Prospective franchisees must weigh the moderate entry fee and significant total investment against the system's unproven long-term expansion capabilities.

This franchise represents a high-risk opportunity given it currently operates as a standalone unit with no proven scale or network effect. ⚠ The investment range of $325,300 to $821,500 is substantial for an unproven concept, particularly combined with a $40,000 franchise fee and 6.0% royalty. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of unit economics, making it difficult to justify the capital requirement. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy offers basic operational stability, but the total reliance on a single model is a critical red flag for potential franchisees.

2 Hours of Freedom presents a high-risk profile due to its status as a concept with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial ($452k - $858k), yet the single unit's Annual Unit Volume of $686,017 suggests tight margins relative to the entry cost. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive note, but the lack of an established footprint makes viability difficult to assess.

Stratos Jets presents a high-barrier entry with a $200,000 franchise fee and a total investment up to $263,000, yet it currently operates with only a single outlet and zero new locations opened last year. The lack of Item 19 financial performance representations is a significant red flag, making it impossible to verify unit economics or potential ROI. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive, the stagnant growth trajectory and high upfront cost suggest this is an unproven model with considerable execution risk.

RealClean Franchisor, LLC is a nascent system consisting of a single outlet with zero unit growth or closures in the last year, indicating a lack of operational scalability and current market penetration. The investment requirement is substantial, ranging from $228,641 to $414,419, which is a high capital burden for a brand without a multi-unit track record. However, the financials present a compelling risk-reward ratio, boasting an exceptional AUV of $1,895,380 against a standard 7.5% royalty fee. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive sign, the extreme reliance on the performance of one unit makes this a highly speculative opportunity.

Superior Food Safety Franchising LLC presents a compelling average unit volume (AUV) of $461,036 against a low total investment of $73,273 - $97,073, suggesting high potential return on investment and capital efficiency ✓. However, the concept faces significant scale and validation challenges, operating with only one total outlet and recording zero growth last year ⚠. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is positive, the 10% royalty rate combined with a solitary unit indicates the franchise model remains unproven and high-risk ⚠.

Affordable Restaurant Service Holdings, LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a $25,000 franchise fee and a total investment starting at $97,500 ✓. However, the concept lacks validation with only one total outlet, zero recent growth, and no Item 19 financial performance data ⚠. The most significant risk factor is the disclosure of a prior bankruptcy, which suggests potential financial instability or operational challenges that outweigh the affordable cost ⚠.

Fly To Fit Franchise, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, posing significant risks regarding system maturity and operational proof. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating the business's profitability, which is a major red flag given the lack of historical growth. While the franchise fee is low and the total investment is relatively accessible, the zero growth trajectory suggests the concept is unproven in a replicated format.

SD TECH presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a $60,000 franchise fee and total investment ranging up to $168,000. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean background with no litigation or bankruptcy history and offers financial performance data in its Item 19. ⚠ However, the concept currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero growth recorded last year, making it an unproven, high-risk investment. The 6.0% royalty rate further pressures margins in a system that has yet to demonstrate replicable success.

Oakwell Franchising presents a high-barrier investment opportunity requiring $1.2M to $2.5M, though it is supported by a robust Average Unit Volume of $2.49M ✓. The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, but its minimal 7.0% royalty rate is overshadowed by a critical lack of scale with only one total outlet ✓. ⚠ With zero growth in the last year and a single-unit system, the concept remains entirely unproven as a scalable franchise model, representing a significant risk for early adopters.

Competitive Edge Physical Therapy Franchising presents a compelling but unproven value proposition, featuring a strong Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $1,025,150 ✓ against a mid-range total investment of $244k-$377k. However, the concept currently lacks scale and validation, operating with only one total outlet and recording zero growth last year ⚠. Additionally, prospective franchisees must carefully weigh this high potential revenue against a steep 10.0% royalty fee and the inherent risks of partnering with a system that has not yet demonstrated successful replication.

Crown Extension Bar, LLC presents a compelling but solitary investment opportunity, characterized by an exceptionally high Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $825,711 ✓. However, the franchise carries significant risk regarding its scalability and validation, as it currently operates only one total outlet with zero new openings last year ⚠. Additionally, the total investment range of $357k–$583k is substantial, requiring rigorous due diligence to determine if the single-unit performance is replicable ⚠.

MD Clinic Systems, LLC is currently a concept in its infancy with a total scale of only one outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure represents a significant risk for prospective investors given the lack of an established track record. ⚠ While the franchise fee is low, the 8.0% royalty rate is high relative to the minimal corporate support and infrastructure typically associated with a non-proven system.

Shwe Dinga LLC (Coco) is a high-risk investment opportunity primarily due to its lack of scale, operating as a single-unit system with zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise requires a significant capital commitment ranging from $330k to $772k, yet fails to provide an Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ⚠ With no new openings and a solitary corporate outlet, the concept remains unproven as a scalable franchise model.

CamiCakes Cupcakes Franchising, LLC presents a concerning lack of scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, indicating a stagnant or unproven franchise system. ✓ The concept offers a low barrier to entry with a $25,000 franchise fee and a total investment starting at $77,800, supported by a solid Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $434,174. ⚠ However, the single-unit footprint makes it difficult to validate the business model's replicability, posing a significant risk for potential franchisees despite the absence of litigation or bankruptcy.

AirMD, LLC presents a low-barrier entry point with a total investment ranging from $53,750 to $75,750 and a reasonable 4.0% royalty fee. ✓ The franchise offers financial transparency through an Item 19 disclosure and maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ✓ However, the system consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating a lack of scale and an unproven expansion trajectory. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should exercise caution as this appears to be a nascent or static concept with limited operational history. ⚠

Blue Burro Franchise, LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with only one total outlet, offering a clean operational baseline with no history of litigation or bankruptcy. ⚠ The franchise presents a significant validation risk as it lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure and has no proven track record of scale. While the 5.0% royalty is standard, the total investment of $237,700 to $524,325 is a substantial commitment for a system with zero proof of concept.

ColorOnly Express Salons presents a high-risk opportunity characterized by a total lack of scale, with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement of $286,172 to $483,072 is steep relative to the franchise's immaturity, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of the concept's profitability. ⚠ With a single unit and no performance data, this franchise offers no proven track record for prospective investors.

Breakfast Club Franchising, Inc. currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, making it a high-risk proposition despite the absence of litigation or bankruptcy. ✓ The single unit demonstrates exceptional financial performance with an AUV of $3.7 million, though this data point is statistically insignificant and potentially an outlier. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face a steep total investment of up to $945,500 with no proven track record of replicating this success.

Casa De Spin Franchising, LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with virtually no proof of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a major risk factor, as it prevents prospective investors from validating the economic viability of the model. While the franchise offers a low cost of entry ($111,800 - $190,133) and a clean legal record, the total lack of operational history makes this a highly speculative venture.

Busy Bee Jumpers Franchise Systems LLC presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ✓ The franchise provides financial transparency with a solid Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $428,406 and maintains a clean legal record. ⚠ However, the investment range is wide and capital-intensive ($161,925 - $717,700), and the single-unit footprint offers no statistical proof of replicability for new partners.

Seek Wellbeing presents a compelling but unproven value proposition, featuring an exceptionally high Average Unit Volume of $894,249 against a low total investment of $102,500 - $132,000 ✓. However, the concept currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, meaning the financial performance lacks validation across a broader system ⚠. While the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive indicator, prospective franchisees face significant risk investing in a young concept with a steep $60,000 franchise fee relative to its limited operating history.

NETH, LLC presents a compelling but unproven concept, characterized by a single unit generating a strong AUV of $710,231 against a mid-range total investment of $147k–$296k ✓. The franchise offers a clean history with no litigation or bankruptcy and maintains a standard 5.0% royalty fee ✓. However, the lack of new outlets opened last year and a zero-net growth trajectory suggest the system is currently stagnant or still in a conceptual launch phase ⚠. Prospective franchisees should note that the financial performance data is likely derived solely from this one operating location rather than a scaled network ⚠.

The Pickle Pad™ presents a highly capital-intensive investment opportunity requiring $1.5M to $4M, which is a substantial financial commitment for an unproven concept. ⚠ The franchise carries significant red flags due to a lack of financial performance disclosure (Item 19), a historical bankruptcy on record, and a complete lack of growth with zero new openings. ✓ The relatively low $30,000 franchise fee and standard 6.0% royalty rate are notable, but they are heavily outweighed by the operational risks. ⚠ With only one total outlet and no current momentum, this concept currently lacks the scale and historical validation required to mitigate the high initial investment risks.

Satellite Teams Global LLC presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment of $77,500 to $100,000 ✓, though the $55,000 franchise fee constitutes a heavy portion of that capital requirement ⚠. While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive sign ✓, the system consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating an unproven and high-risk startup model ⚠. Additionally, the 10.0% royalty rate is significant given the lack of established infrastructure or economies of scale ⚠.

Hang It Up TVs Franchising, LLC presents a compelling but unproven concept, evidenced by a single operating unit that generates a strong Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $363,524. ✓ The franchise offers an accessible entry point with a low $25,000 fee and a total investment ranging from roughly $50k to $85k. ⚠ However, the lack of system-wide scale and zero outlet growth last year suggest the business model is currently in a nascent, high-risk stage.

BunzGourmetburgersfranchise LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, indicating an unproven and nascent franchise system. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure presents a significant risk for investors seeking performance validation. While the franchise offers a low entry fee of $20,000 and a total investment starting at $56,200, the lack of recent outlet growth suggests the concept is still in the pilot phase.

Pod Plug Franchising, LLC is currently a micro-scale operation with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, indicating an unproven and high-risk franchise model. ⚠ The 8.0% royalty fee is steep given the low Average Unit Volume of $13,953, which suggests potential challenges regarding unit profitability and sustainability. ✓ While the entry cost is relatively low ($52k-$106k) and the record is clean of litigation or bankruptcy, the lack of operational history makes this a speculative venture.

Craft Loft Franchising presents a compelling Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $400,238 against a mid-range total investment of $133,550 - $248,300 ✓. However, the concept currently lacks scale and proof of replicability, operating with only one total outlet and recording zero growth last year ⚠. While the clean legal history is a positive, the lack of an operating track record makes this a high-risk proposition for potential franchisees ⚠.

Jamin Franchise, LLC currently lacks operational scale with only one total outlet and zero growth over the last year, suggesting the concept is either in its infancy or stagnant. ✓ The franchise offers a moderate entry point with a mid-range franchise fee and no history of litigation or bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the wide total investment range of $116,000 to $431,300 creates significant uncertainty regarding capital requirements for a system with minimal proof of concept.

Hawks Kids presents a low-risk entry point with a clean legal history and no recent closures or litigation. ✓ The franchise offers a highly accessible total investment ($87.5k–$218.7k) paired with a strong Average Unit Volume ($626,836), suggesting robust unit-level economics. ⚠ However, the concept currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, making it a single-unit prototype rather than a proven, scaled network.

VR Junkies Franchise presents a low barrier to entry with a $20,000 franchise fee and a total investment ranging from $83,800 to $171,800 ✓. However, the concept currently lacks any proof of scale or market validation, operating with only one total outlet and recording zero growth in the last year ⚠. The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag for prospective investors given the system's immaturity ⚠.

GLOSSHOUZ USA LLC presents a compelling but unproven high-volume model, boasting an impressive AUV of $3.3M against a steep total investment of up to $1.4M. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive indicator, though the single-outlet footprint makes the system statistically insignificant. ⚠ With zero growth last year and only one operating unit, this concept lacks the validation and operational history typically required for a secure investment.

VDN Franchising LLC presents a high-risk profile defined by its complete lack of scale, with only one total outlet and zero growth recorded last year. The investment requirement of $326,000 to $596,000 is steep relative to the concept's maturity ⚠, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure removes any data-backed validation of unit economics. Additionally, the combination of a $45,000 franchise fee and a 6% royalty rate appears aggressive for a system with no proven track record of successful replication.

BAR-B-QSA presents a significant financial commitment with a total investment reaching up to $490,375, though the clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy is a positive indicator. ✓ The franchise offers financial transparency with an Item 19 disclosure, but the single-unit footprint and zero growth last year suggest the concept is currently unproven and stagnant. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face a "pioneer" risk, as the lack of an established network or recent openings provides no validation of market traction or scalability. ⚠

Bonmi Franchise presents a compelling but unproven value proposition, featuring a single corporate outlet with strong Average Unit Volumes of $648,370. ✓ The investment range of $257,200 to $483,900 appears reasonable relative to the disclosed revenue, and the franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the system lacks scale and momentum, having opened zero new units last year, meaning the franchise fee and royalty structure have not been validated by third-party operators.

Measure Nationwide, LLC presents a significant risk profile as a startup concept, evidenced by its complete lack of scale with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise imposes a high 8.0% royalty rate and lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering prospective franchisees no empirical data to validate the business model or potential return on investment. ⚠ With a total investment reaching up to $241,700, the cost of entry is substantial for an unproven system that has yet to demonstrate market traction or stability.

Tulip Kids Franchising presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of established scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ The investment requirement is significant ($450k–$500k) relative to the concept's maturity, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of potential returns. ✓ The company maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, but the 6.0% royalty fee adds ongoing costs to an already unproven business model.

Complete Mobile Drug Testing Franchise LLC presents a high-risk profile due to its minimal scale, operating with only a single total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise imposes a steep 10% royalty fee on top of a $50,000 franchise fee, resulting in a high cost structure relative to its unproven system. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy provides a clean legal baseline, and the presence of an Item 19 offers some financial transparency. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should be cautious, as the total investment of $72,350 to $123,150 buys into a concept that effectively lacks an operational track record or peer network.

Dirty Dough Franchising presents a high-risk profile due to its lack of scale with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. While the franchise offers a unique value proposition with a $0 franchise fee and provides an Item 19 financial disclosure ✓, the total investment of $157,250 - $338,000 remains significant for an unproven concept. Additionally, the presence of litigation ⚠ creates uncertainty for prospective franchisees evaluating the system's stability.

Archive Franchise Network, LLC is currently a micro-scale operation with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, indicating an unproven or nascent business model. ✓ The franchise offers a low barrier to entry with a moderate total investment ($58,650 - $200,850) and maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the combination of a single unit and zero openings last year suggests high risk due to a lack of operational scale and market validation.

LYFT 24, INC. presents an extremely high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale, operating with only a single unit and opening just one location last year. ⚠ The investment range is exceptionally wide and capital-intensive ($196,800 - $1,931,000), yet the franchise offers no Item 19 financial performance data to validate the potential return on investment. ⚠ With zero historical data, minimal operational history, and no proof of concept, this opportunity lacks the stability and transparency typically required for a sound investment.