Companies

Lime House Franchise, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a nascent concept with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, removing critical data needed to validate the potential return on a substantial investment ranging from $348k to $781k. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive administrative note, but the single-unit scale suggests the system is unproven and lacks operational maturity.

Lolo's CNW, LLC presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $651,000 to $2.2 million, though the presence of an Item 19 ✓ offers essential financial transparency for prospective investors. The franchise maintains a clean background regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓, but its single-unit footprint and lack of growth over the last year indicate a completely unproven model ⚠. With zero recent openings, this concept lacks the scale to demonstrate replicability or sustained momentum ⚠.

Lil Athletes Franchising presents a low-barrier entry into the youth sports market with a total investment of $55,300 to $72,000 and a healthy Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $301,137 ✓. However, the concept currently lacks proof of scalability, operating with only one total outlet and recording zero growth in the last year ⚠. While the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive sign, prospective buyers must be aware that this is an unproven franchise system with no track record of replication ⚠.

BP Smokehouse Franchising, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with effectively no franchise track record, presenting a high-risk profile despite a clean legal history with no litigation or bankruptcy ✓. The brand requires a significant capital commitment, with a total investment reaching up to $713,600, yet justifies this cost with a solid Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $685,755 ✓. However, the complete lack of franchise growth last year indicates the concept is unproven at scale ⚠.

The Picnic Collective Franchising LLC is a high-risk, early-stage concept with only one total outlet and zero growth last year. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of the business model's profitability. ✓ While the franchise offers a low cost of entry ($39.2k-$95.3k) and minimal fees ($10k fee, 4% royalty), the lack of operational scale makes it a speculative venture.

Disaster Blaster National presents a compelling value proposition with a low total investment ($139,820 - $254,901) relative to a strong Average Unit Volume of $609,413 ✓. The franchise maintains a clean record with no litigation or bankruptcy, and the 6.0% royalty fee appears reasonable for the sector ✓. However, the system consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating a severe lack of scale and an unproven franchise model ⚠. Prospective partners should exercise extreme caution, as the operational framework lacks the validation that comes with a larger network ⚠.

India Bazaar LLC is currently a single-unit operation with a minimal footprint, making it a de facto startup concept rather than an established franchise system. ⚠ The total investment ranges from roughly $920,000 to over $3.2 million, representing a substantial financial risk given the lack of an Item 19 financial performance disclosure. ⚠ With zero net growth last year (one opening offset by one closure), the concept offers no proven track record of scalability or sustainability to justify the high entry cost.

Green Food Solutions Franchise, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, indicating an unproven business model and a high-risk profile for potential franchisees. ✓ The franchise offers a low entry fee of $35,000 and provides an Item 19 financial performance representation, while maintaining a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the lack of any new outlets opened last year suggests stagnant growth, and the 7.0% royalty fee may be steep for a system lacking established support infrastructure.

FlyMyRide is an extremely early-stage concept with only one total outlet, making it a high-risk ground-floor opportunity rather than a proven system. ✓ The franchise offers a highly accessible entry point with zero franchise fees and a low total investment of $39.5k-$65.5k. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating the business model's profitability. ⚠ With minimal scale and no historical performance data, this opportunity lacks the stability and track record typically required for a sound investment.

AWAT Fitness Inc. is currently a single-unit operation with no recent franchise growth, indicating a launch-stage concept with an unproven scale. ✓ The franchise offers a low barrier to entry with a $25,000 fee and a total investment starting at $104,500, supported by a disclosed AUV of $279,369. ⚠ However, the lack of new outlets opened last year suggests the system is stagnant or untested, presenting a significant risk for early adopters.

Vaura Incorporated presents a high-barrier-to-entry investment opportunity with a total cost ranging from $833,000 to over $1.28 million. ✓ The franchise demonstrates strong unit-level economics with an Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $1,079,328, suggesting a potentially profitable return on investment for the single operating outlet. ⚠ However, the concept is currently unproven at scale with only one total location and a notable $100,000 franchise fee, and the disclosure of active litigation introduces risk for prospective partners.

This franchise presents a high-risk opportunity characterized by a total lack of scale with only one corporate outlet and zero franchise growth in the last year. ⚠ The investment range of $370,000 to $838,500 is substantial for an unproven concept, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of potential returns. ⚠ With a standard 5.0% royalty but no operational track record or network effect, the offering lacks the necessary data to justify the capital requirement.

Another Nine, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with a minimal growth trajectory, having opened zero net new locations beyond its sole existing outlet. The franchise presents a significant financial risk with a high initial investment reaching up to $397,350 and a steep 6.5% royalty fee, yet it fails to provide an Item 19 financial performance representation to substantiate these costs. While the lack of litigation or bankruptcy is a ✓, the absence of scale and verified earnings data makes this a highly speculative opportunity.

Holt Computer Training currently operates as a single-unit system with no recent growth, indicating it is either a new concept or stagnant. ⚠ The franchise presents significant red flags for investors, including a historical bankruptcy and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation. ⚠ With a total investment ranging up to $420,000 and 6.0% royalties, the financial risk is high given the lack of proven scale or transparency.

Jayasri Sweets presents a compelling but solitary investment opportunity, characterized by a single operating unit generating a robust Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $1,024,316. ✓ While the brand maintains a clean legal record and strong unit economics, the total investment of $243,000 - $497,000 is substantial given the concept's total lack of scale. ⚠ With zero outlets opened or closed last year, the franchise appears to have a stagnant growth trajectory, offering no proof of replicability or system maturity. ⚠

Grieb Carwash currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero recent growth, signaling an unproven franchise model despite a clean legal record. ⚠ The financial barrier to entry is exceptionally high, requiring a total investment of up to $3.3 million alongside a steep 8.0% royalty fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating potential returns for this capital-intensive concept.

CW Designs Franchise, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with no proven scale or franchise track record. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents prospective investors from validating the business model's potential profitability. ⚠ With zero growth last year and only one total outlet, the system lacks the stability and support infrastructure typical of established brands. While the total investment is relatively low, the franchise represents a high-risk opportunity with no historical data to suggest successful replication.

Car Doctor Plus is currently a single-unit operation, making it a de facto startup with no proven track record of scalability or franchise support. ⚠ The investment range of $218,000 to $538,000 represents a significant capital risk, particularly since the company lacks an Item 19 financial performance representation. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive note, but the 6.0% royalty fee adds ongoing pressure to an unproven business model.

Bigshots Holdco, LLC presents an exceptionally high barrier to entry with a total investment ranging from $8.5M to $12M, positioning it as a premium, capital-intensive opportunity rather than a scalable model for average operators. ⚠ The franchise lacks an Item 19 financial performance representation, denying prospective investors critical data to validate the return potential for such a massive capital outlay. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive note, yet the concept remains unproven at scale with only one total outlet opened and zero closures reported last year.

Gold Palm, LLC is a micro-scale startup franchise with only one total outlet, indicating the concept is currently unproven and lacks operational history. ✓ The franchise offers a highly accessible entry point with a low $25,000 fee and a total investment starting at $72,650, complemented by a competitive 4.0% royalty rate. ⚠ Significant risk is present as the company does not provide an Item 19 financial disclosure, meaning prospective franchisees cannot validate potential earnings or viability.

Milk Jar Cookies presents a high-risk opportunity given its status as a concept with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The total investment range of $327,545 to $750,770 is substantial, particularly when paired with a 7.0% royalty rate and a $50,000 franchise fee for an unproven system. ✓ While the absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a positive administrative sign, the lack of scale offers no validation of the business model's replicability.

Kentro Franchising presents a compelling but unproven value proposition, featuring an exceptionally high Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $997,409 ✓ against a clean background with no litigation or bankruptcy ✓. However, the concept is currently comprised of a single corporate outlet with zero franchise growth last year ⚠, offering no track record of third-party operational success. Additionally, the total investment ranges significantly from $387,800 to $896,800 ⚠, creating high financial risk for early adopters relying solely on internal performance data.

AleCall presents a high-risk opportunity due to its total lack of scale, operating as a single-unit concept with zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise requires a significant capital investment of up to $459,500 yet fails to provide an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering no data to validate potential returns. ⚠ With no proven track record of replication or system-wide expansion, this concept remains an unproven startup rather than a stable franchise system.

Lemon Love Franchising presents a compelling but unproven value proposition, featuring a low total investment ($57k–$127.9k) and strong Average Unit Volume ($639.5k) ✓. However, the system consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating a high-risk, early-stage concept lacking scale ⚠. Prospective franchisees should exercise caution, as the financial performance is based on a very limited operational history.

Awake Franchising is currently in the earliest stages of development with a single operating unit, representing a high-risk, ground-floor opportunity despite the absence of litigation or bankruptcy ✓. The franchise offers a transparent financial picture with a solid Average Unit Volume of $481,237, though the total investment of up to $592,600 suggests a significant capital requirement relative to current scale ⚠. With zero net growth last year, the concept lacks an established trajectory, making it suitable only for investors comfortable with the volatility inherent in unproven systems ⚠.

Uncle Tetsu presents a high-barrier entry strategy with a total investment ranging from $699,900 to $995,500, which is aggressive given the single-unit operational footprint. ✓ The brand maintained a net positive growth trajectory by opening one outlet without closures last year, but ⚠ the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents verification of ROI for this capital-intensive model. ⚠ The presence of litigation further adds risk for prospective franchisees evaluating this solitary operator.

Xtension Envy Franchise Group, LLC presents a high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement is steep ($322,750 - $503,750) given the concept is unproven, and the presence of litigation creates a significant red flag for potential franchisees. ✓ While the company provides an Item 19 financial disclosure, the 6.0% royalty fee adds to the cost burden of a system that has demonstrated no recent momentum.

Salad Spot is currently an unproven concept with a single operating location, presenting significant risk despite a clean legal record with no litigation or bankruptcy ✓. The brand requires a heavy capital investment of up to $945,000, which creates a high barrier to entry and substantial financial exposure for a non-established chain ⚠. Additionally, the 8.0% royalty rate is aggressive for a new franchise, and the lack of historical scale makes it difficult to validate the long-term viability of the business model ⚠.

Fly To Fit Franchise, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, posing significant risks regarding system maturity and operational proof. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating the business's profitability, which is a major red flag given the lack of historical growth. While the franchise fee is low and the total investment is relatively accessible, the zero growth trajectory suggests the concept is unproven in a replicated format.

This franchise presents an exceptionally high-risk profile due to its lack of scale and missing financial performance data. ⚠ With only one total outlet and no Item 19 disclosure, prospective investors lack the historical data or operational proof of concept necessary to justify the steep $535,900 to $930,000 investment. ⚠ The presence of litigation further compounds the risk, offering little assurance of stability or support for new franchisees.

PetNmind presents a high-risk profile due to its minimal scale, operating with only one total outlet and showing zero growth over the last year. While the franchise offers a clean background with no litigation or bankruptcy and reports a strong Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $401,475, the lack of operational history makes it difficult to validate the sustainability of this performance against the $159,700 to $299,000 investment. Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution, as the system currently lacks the proven track record and network effects typically associated with a $40,000 franchise fee.

2 Hours of Freedom presents a high-risk profile due to its status as a concept with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial ($452k - $858k), yet the single unit's Annual Unit Volume of $686,017 suggests tight margins relative to the entry cost. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive note, but the lack of an established footprint makes viability difficult to assess.

HaloHeat Sauna Studios is currently a single-unit operation with no franchise validation, making it a high-risk "ground floor" opportunity despite its clean legal record ✓. The brand requires a substantial capital investment of $500k–$800k, which is a significant financial commitment ⚠ given the total lack of an Item 19 financial performance disclosure. With only one outlet opened and zero closed last year, the concept lacks the historical data and scale necessary to mitigate risk for prospective investors ⚠.

Mobius Franchising presents a puzzling investment profile characterized by an extreme lack of scale alongside a very high capital requirement of $1.6M to $3.8M. ✓ The franchise demonstrates strong unit-level economics with an AUV of roughly $1.6 million and a clean legal record, but ⚠ the existence of only one total outlet and zero recent growth makes it impossible to validate the replicability of the model. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face significant risk investing in a concept that effectively lacks an operational track record or proven system.

Friend of a Farmer presents a compelling but singular investment case, boasting an exceptional Average Unit Volume (AUV) of $2.95M that significantly outweighs its mid-to-high range total investment of $260k–$612k. ✓ Despite strong unit economics and a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, the concept currently operates as a standalone entity with zero recent growth, offering no proof of replicability at scale. ⚠ Prospective partners must exercise extreme caution, as the lack of an established network suggests the franchise system is unproven and potentially experimental.

Avotoasty Franchising LLC is an extremely early-stage concept with virtually no proof of scale, operating with only one total outlet and zero recent growth. ⚠ The franchise requires a significant capital commitment up to $478k, yet the Average Unit Volume of $418k suggests tight margins and a long road to profitability given the 5.5% royalty. ✓ The absence of litigation or bankruptcy provides a clean legal baseline, but the lack of an established track record represents a substantial risk for prospective investors.

Morejoan, Inc. presents a high-risk profile as a "start-up" franchise with only one total outlet and zero growth in the last year. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a significant red flag, making it difficult to validate the potential return on a substantial initial investment of $400k to $755k. ✓ The business maintains a clean legal record and offers a relatively low royalty rate of 4.0%, but the concept currently lacks the proven scale and historical data required for a secure investment.

Window-Fix LLC presents a low-barrier entry into the home services sector with a modest $10,000 franchise fee and a mid-range total investment between $101,450 and $156,000. ✓ The opportunity is de-risked by a clean leadership record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, as well as the provision of an Item 19 financial performance disclosure. ⚠ However, the concept currently lacks scale and validation, operating with only one total outlet and showing zero growth over the last year.

Eliodoro Casa Mexico, Inc. presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $826,000 to $1.75 million, making it accessible only to well-capitalized investors. ✓ The franchise offers a clean record with no litigation or bankruptcy history and provides an Item 19 financial disclosure, which offers transparency regarding potential performance. ⚠ However, the concept currently lacks scale with only one total outlet and zero growth last year, indicating an unproven and high-risk model. ⚠ The combination of a single-unit footprint and high startup costs suggests this is an early-stage venture without an established track record of success.

JPD Franchising, LLC is currently a single-unit operation with minimal scale, having opened and closed zero outlets last year. ✓ The franchise presents a compelling value proposition with a moderate total investment ($137,600 - $244,000) and a strong Average Unit Volume ($631,730) relative to entry costs. ⚠ However, the lack of system-wide growth represents a significant risk, as the concept remains unproven in the hands of external franchisees.

This franchise represents a high-risk opportunity given it currently operates as a standalone unit with no proven scale or network effect. ⚠ The investment range of $325,300 to $821,500 is substantial for an unproven concept, particularly combined with a $40,000 franchise fee and 6.0% royalty. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of unit economics, making it difficult to justify the capital requirement. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy offers basic operational stability, but the total reliance on a single model is a critical red flag for potential franchisees.

Yunker Bunker is currently a single-unit operation with no proof of concept as a scalable franchise, presenting significant risk despite a clean legal history ✓. The massive variance in total investment ($35.5k to $1.48M) coupled with the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ makes it impossible to gauge potential ROI or unit economics. With zero growth in the last year, this concept remains entirely unproven and highly speculative for potential investors.

WCSD Inc. presents an exceptionally high cost of entry relative to its minimal scale, operating as a startup with only one total outlet and a steep $50,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure and the unproven nature of the concept pose significant investment risks, despite the initial stability of zero closures. ✓ With a total investment reaching up to $109,000, prospective franchisees are paying a premium for a system that currently lacks a proven track record or operational history.

Avari Beauty Franchise, LLC presents an accessible entry point into the beauty industry with a moderate total investment ($120,700 - $190,000) and a standard royalty structure of 6.0% ✓. However, the concept is currently unproven at scale, operating with only one total outlet and showing zero growth over the last year ⚠. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure further complicates the investment thesis, leaving potential franchisees without critical data to forecast returns ⚠.

GH Builders NY is currently a single-unit operation, indicating it is either a startup or a new franchise system with a minimal track record of scale. While the franchise benefits from a clean history regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ prevents prospective investors from validating potential earnings. Additionally, the $54,000 franchise fee is aggressive for a new brand ⚠, representing a high entry cost relative to the system's limited operational history and support infrastructure.

Roberic Furniture Development LLC is currently a single-unit operation with no recent franchise growth, indicating an unproven and nascent system. ✓ The low total investment ($88,550 - $141,500) offers an accessible entry point relative to the reported Average Unit Volume of $399,471. ⚠ However, potential franchisees face significant risk due to the total lack of scale and an unverified business model. ⚠ Additionally, the 7.0% royalty fee is relatively high for a new franchise without an established support infrastructure.

Concordia Homecare Franchising presents a compelling but unproven value proposition, featuring a low total investment ($87,633 - $132,317) and strong Item 19 financial performance (AUV $1.57M). ✓ Despite the affordable entry point and clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, the network consists of only one total outlet with zero growth last year, indicating a lack of established franchise traction. ⚠ Prospective buyers should approach with caution, as the system lacks the validation of a multi-unit operator base despite the high revenue potential.

Central Cycling Franchise, LLC presents a high-margin opportunity with an Average Unit Volume ($404,006) that significantly exceeds the total investment range of $180,650 - $323,000 ✓. The franchise maintains a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓, though the single-unit footprint and lack of new openings last year indicate the concept is currently unproven at scale ⚠. Prospective franchisees should note that while the return on investment potential is strong, the system lacks an established track record of growth ⚠.

Dripology presents a high-risk profile as a single-unit operation with no proven scale or historical growth trajectory. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating the economic viability of the concept. ⚠ With zero new outlets opened and a total dependency on one location, the franchise lacks the stability typically associated with the required $40,000 fee and total investment of up to $400,500.

FBSR Franchises Inc. is an extremely early-stage concept with a single corporate outlet, offering a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓. However, the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure ⚠ combined with zero recent outlet growth suggests the business model is unproven at scale. Prospective franchisees face high risk investing $166,900 - $298,900 into a system that has not yet demonstrated market traction or franchisee viability.