Companies

Greenlight Personal Training presents a high-risk profile due to a complete lack of operational scale, with zero total outlets and no growth recorded in the last year. ⚠ The franchise requires a significant initial investment ($85k-$153.5k) and charges an 8.0% royalty fee, yet offers no Item 19 financial performance data to validate potential returns. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy is a minor administrative positive, but the absence of a proven operating history makes this a speculative venture.

SAIJO Hand Roll Bar presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $1.2M to $1.9M, yet it currently lacks any operational scale with zero total outlets. ⚠ Significant risk factors include the presence of litigation and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, which prevents validation of the model’s profitability. ⚠ With zero growth recorded last year and no established track record, prospective franchisees are investing in an unproven concept with substantial capital exposure.

Ace Pickleball Club represents a high-entry investment opportunity requiring roughly $1 million to $1.3 million with zero current operational scale. ✓ The concept benefits from the surging popularity of pickleball and maintains a clean leadership record regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ However, the total lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure combined with zero open outlets presents significant validation risks for prospective franchisees. ⚠ Additionally, the 7.0% royalty rate adds ongoing pressure to an unproven business model.

Larks LLC presents an exceptionally high-risk profile characterized by a complete lack of operational scale and a total investment reaching up to $4 million. ⚠ The franchise is weighed down by critical red flags, including a history of litigation and bankruptcy, as well as the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ⚠ With zero outlets currently operating and no growth trajectory, prospective investors face immediate solvency risks with no proof of concept.

Puradak presents a high-risk opportunity characterized by a total lack of scale, with 0 total outlets and no growth recorded last year. While the franchise benefits from a clean background regarding litigation and bankruptcy ✓, the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of the business model’s profitability ⚠. Prospective investors face a substantial total investment of $255k–$481k for an unproven concept with no operating track record.

Jars by Fabio Viviani presents a high-risk franchise opportunity characterized by a total lack of operational scale, with zero outlets currently open and no growth recorded last year. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure removes any visibility into potential unit economics or profitability for prospective investors. ⚠ Despite a relatively low $35,000 franchise fee, the total investment ranges widely up to $645,500, representing a significant capital exposure for an unproven concept. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean legal record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, but the absence of a track record makes this a speculative venture.

MRCOOL Franchising, LLC presents a high-risk opportunity characterized by a total lack of operational scale, with 0 total outlets and no openings or closures in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial, ranging from $1.1 million to nearly $7 million, yet the franchise offers no Item 19 financial performance data to validate the potential return on capital. ⚠ While the 2.5% royalty fee is competitive, the absence of an established track record or any franchised units makes this a speculative venture suited only for true pioneers.

Lukumades Franchise LLC presents a high-risk profile as a pre-revenue concept with zero total outlets and no open units in the last year. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of economic performance, while the disclosure of ongoing litigation adds a significant layer of risk for early investors. ✓ The total investment range of $197,795 to $321,525 offers a relatively accessible entry point compared to established restaurant brands, though the 6.0% royalty fee is standard. Potential franchisees should exercise extreme caution given the unproven business model and lack of historical scale.

Burger Factory presents a high-risk opportunity characterized by a total lack of scale, with zero total outlets and no growth recorded in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial ($353k - $542k) for an unproven concept that lacks an Item 19 financial disclosure, offering no data on potential profitability. ⚠ Prospective franchisees are essentially funding a startup with no operating history or validation.

Pie Bar Franchise, LLC presents a high-risk profile defined by a total lack of operational scale, with 0 total outlets and no growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise carries a significant historical red flag due to a disclosed bankruptcy, which is compounded by the absence of an Item 19 to validate potential earnings. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face a steep $35,000 fee for an unproven system, making the $230,600 to $478,000 total investment highly speculative without a track record of success.

Angus Valley Montessori presents a high-barrier entry model with a total investment ranging from $1.9M to $3M and a premium $80,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The complete absence of operating outlets and the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure represent significant risks for prospective investors evaluating the concept's viability. ⚠ With zero growth trajectory last year, this appears to be a startup franchise opportunity lacking the proven scale and historical performance data typically required to justify the substantial capital requirement.

Pilar Operations presents a high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale with zero operating outlets and no recent growth activity. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial ($539k+), yet the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of potential returns. ⚠ Significant credibility concerns arise from disclosed litigation and bankruptcy history combined with a $40,000 franchise fee.

WNFranchising, LLC presents a high-risk profile due to a complete lack of operational scale, with zero total outlets and no growth in the past year. ⚠ The combination of a high 7.0% royalty rate and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure makes it impossible to validate potential returns. ⚠ Significant red flags include a disclosed litigation history and a steep $49,500 franchise fee for an unproven concept.

CyberGlobal presents a high-risk profile characterized by a complete lack of operational scale, with zero total outlets and no growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise requires a substantial initial investment ($102,050 - $123,900) and a high entry fee ($75,000) despite having no Item 19 financial performance data to validate the business model. ⚠ With no proven track record or active franchisees, this concept offers no evidence of viability or return on investment.

VibeFlow Yoga presents a high-risk opportunity characterized by a total lack of operational scale, with zero total outlets and no openings in the last year. ⚠ The franchise carries a significant bankruptcy flag and offers no Item 19 financial data, making it impossible to validate potential returns against a steep $345,750 to $535,750 investment. ⚠ With a standard 6.0% royalty fee attached to an unproven model, this concept offers no tangible track record of success for prospective franchisees.

UBX presents a significant risk profile as a pre-revenue franchise with zero total outlets and no Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ⚠ The franchise fee of $42,500 and 8.0% royalty rate appear aggressive for an unproven concept lacking an operating history. ⚠ While the total investment of $130,147 to $307,797 is relatively moderate, the absence of any opened or closed units last year suggests the system is currently stagnant.

Restpoint Inn presents a high-cost market entry strategy with a total investment ranging from $278k to over $3 million, yet it currently lacks any operational scale or proof of concept with zero total outlets. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a critical risk for investors, particularly given the unproven nature of the brand and the significant capital required. ✓ The franchise maintains a clean background regarding litigation and bankruptcy, but the complete lack of recent growth or open units suggests this is a ground-floor opportunity with untested demand.

Dazzler Select presents a high-risk profile defined by a total lack of operational scale, with zero total outlets and no growth recorded in the last year. ⚠ The franchise carries a significant entry barrier with a wide investment range of $178,882 to $1,864,912, yet fails to provide an Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ⚠ The presence of active litigation further compounds the risk, offering prospective franchisees no performance data or proven track record to justify the capital outlay.

This franchise presents a low barrier to entry with a total investment of $92,100 - $141,100 ✓, but it currently lacks any operational scale with 0 total outlets and no growth trajectory ⚠. The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents potential investors from validating the business model's profitability ⚠. Additionally, the combination of a high 8.0% royalty fee and zero established presence suggests a high-risk opportunity with no trading history ⚠.

Auntea Jenny presents a high-risk profile as a pre-revenue franchise with zero established outlets, meaning prospective franchisees act as unproven beta testers rather than joining a proven system. ⚠ The total investment is substantial ($285k–$596k) given the total lack of operational history and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation. ✓ The franchise offers a very low 1.0% royalty rate and a clean background regarding litigation and bankruptcy, but the brand currently lacks the scale and track record necessary to validate the required capital outlay.

Grizzly Auto Detailing Franchises, LLC presents a high-risk opportunity with zero current outlets and no operating history to validate the business model. ⚠ The franchise fee represents a significant portion of the total investment, yet the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation makes it impossible to gauge potential returns. ⚠ With no units opened or closed last year, the concept remains unproven and lacks the scale or trajectory typically required for a secure investment.

Egg Drop presents a high-risk profile as a pre-revenue concept with zero total outlets and no operating history to validate the model. ⚠ The franchise requires a significant initial investment ($204k+) and charges an 8.0% royalty fee, yet offers no Item 19 financial performance data to substantiate the potential return. ⚠ With zero growth last year and no established footprint, prospective franchisees face total market uncertainty with an unproven brand.

Ugly Dumpling presents a high-risk opportunity characterized by a total lack of scale, with zero total outlets and no growth recorded in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial ($427k - $1.6M) yet lacks the critical validation of an Item 19 financial performance representation. ⚠ Prospective franchisees face the dual risk of funding an unproven concept and paying a steep $50,000 franchise fee without historical operating data.

La Pino'z Pizza presents a high-risk entry point characterized by a total lack of scale with zero operating outlets. ⚠ The franchise imposes a steep 25.0% royalty fee and a significant $150,000 franchise fee, yet fails to provide Item 19 financial performance data to substantiate these costs. ⚠ With no established unit growth or operational history, prospective investors lack the necessary metrics to validate the substantial $214,000 to $1,248,000 investment requirement.

Nana's Green Tea presents a high-barrier-to-entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $627,400 to $1,508,400, yet it currently lacks any operational scale with zero total outlets. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of potential returns, which is a significant risk given the substantial capital required. ⚠ With zero growth recorded last year and no established footprint, this concept lacks the proven track record typically necessary to justify such a high-cost investment.

Pizza Depot presents a high-risk profile as a startup concept with zero total outlets and no operating history to validate the model. ⚠ The investment requirement of $437,700 to $591,700 is substantial for an unproven brand, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents an assessment of potential returns. ⚠ With no growth trajectory or active units, prospective franchisees are essentially funding a ground-floor experiment with no guarantee of success.

ZEISS VISION CENTER presents a high-barrier entry point with a total investment ranging from $605,000 to $1.1 million, yet it currently lacks the operational scale to justify this cost, evidenced by zero total outlets and no growth in the last year. ⚠ A critical risk for investors is the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure, meaning there is no data to validate potential returns or profitability for this expensive concept. ⚠ With zero franchise fees collected and no royalty structure listed, the franchise appears to be in a pre-launch or stagnant phase, offering no track record of success.

Fun BeerKing presents a significant financial risk as a pre-revenue concept with zero total outlets and no Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ⚠ The franchise requires a substantial total investment of $332,000–$580,000, which is a high entry price for an unproven system with no established growth trajectory. ⚠ While the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a minor administrative positive ✓, the lack of any operational history makes this a highly speculative venture.

Pizzaexpress US Limited currently reports zero total outlets with no units opened or closed in the last year, indicating a dormant or pre-launch operational status in the US market. ⚠ The franchise carries a significant entry barrier with a total investment ranging from $930,847 to $1,955,672, and presents a major red flag due to a disclosed history of bankruptcy. ✓ The opportunity does offer financial performance representations (Item 19) and maintains a clean litigation record, but the lack of scale and solvency concerns suggest high risk.

Vizta Tint Holdings, INC presents a high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale with zero total outlets and no growth in the last year. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents validation of earning potential, while the disclosure of ongoing litigation adds a significant layer of legal risk for prospective franchisees. Although the total investment of $58,650 - $119,800 is relatively low, the combination of a 7.0% royalty fee and an unproven operating model suggests caution is warranted.

Cookie Co. Franchising is currently a pre-revenue startup concept with zero total outlets, despite listing one outlet opened last year, indicating a very early-stage proof of concept. While the franchise benefits from a clean legal record ✓ and provides an Item 19 financial disclosure ✓, the total investment of $162,500 to $460,500 is relatively high for an unproven brand. Additionally, the 8.0% royalty rate is aggressive ⚠ and poses a significant risk for initial franchisees given the lack of an established operating history or scale.

MindChamps presents a high-barrier entry strategy with a total investment reaching up to $1.18 million and a substantial $100,000 franchise fee. ⚠ The complete absence of operating outlets and zero growth last year suggests this is a launch-phase concept lacking historical validation or a proven footprint. ⚠ The significant capital requirement is further complicated by the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure, making it difficult to assess potential return on investment.

Mariam Coffee Franchise, LLC presents a high-risk opportunity as a pre-revenue concept with zero established outlets and no Item 19 financial performance data. ⚠ The franchise requires a significant initial investment of $149,000 to $283,500 despite having no operational track record or proven growth trajectory. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history offers basic structural integrity, but the lack of scale makes this a speculative venture.

Cortz presents a ground-floor investment opportunity with zero established outlets, meaning the system is entirely unproven. ⚠ The franchise lacks an Item 19 financial performance representation, increasing financial risk for early adopters. ✓ The total investment is relatively accessible ($100k-$200k), though the $40,000 franchise fee is substantial given the lack of operational history. ⚠ With no growth trajectory or current scale, this opportunity carries high risk typical of a startup concept.

D Spot Dessert Cafe presents a high-risk profile due to a total lack of scale, with zero total outlets and no growth recorded in the last year. ⚠ The investment requirement is substantial, ranging from $785k to $1.8M, yet the franchise offers no Item 19 financial disclosure to validate potential returns. ⚠ With no operating footprint or earnings data, this concept appears to be an unproven startup venture rather than an established system.

HPB HVAC LLC presents a low-risk profile regarding legal history and transparency, offering an Item 19 financial performance representation despite having zero total outlets. ✓ The franchise requires a moderate total investment of roughly $196k to $252k, though the 7.0% royalty fee is a significant ongoing cost for a new system. ⚠ With zero openings and zero closings last year, the concept currently lacks scale and demonstrates a static growth trajectory.

G.TEC NEUROTECHNOLOGY USA, INC. presents a high-risk profile as a potential startup concept with zero operating outlets and no historical growth trajectory. ⚠ The franchise imposes a steep 11.0% royalty fee without providing an Item 19 financial disclosure, making it difficult to validate potential returns against the $71,000 - $349,500 investment. ✓ While the company has a clean record regarding litigation and bankruptcy, the total lack of scale and absence of performance data are significant red flags for prospective franchisees.

Punjabi Chaap Corner presents a high-risk opportunity characterized by a total lack of operational scale, with zero current outlets and no growth recorded last year. ⚠ The franchise requires a substantial total investment of up to $663,000 alongside a $50,000 fee, yet offers no Item 19 financial data to validate the potential return on investment. ⚠ With no proven track record or revenue performance metrics, this concept offers no tangible evidence of viability for prospective franchisees.

Enlightened Business Advisory Group LLC presents a high-cost consulting franchise model requiring a total investment of up to $454,100, yet it currently operates with zero total outlets and recorded no growth last year. ⚠ The combination of a steep $50,000 franchise fee and a maximum 20.0% royalty rate demands significant revenue generation to achieve profitability, a challenge given the unproven system. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation prevents potential investors from validating the business's earning potential. ⚠ With no established scale or operating history, this opportunity represents a high-risk venture lacking the historical data necessary for a sound investment analysis.

This franchise presents a high-risk pre-revenue opportunity, characterized by zero active outlets and an unproven business model. ⚠ The total investment ranges significantly from $269k to $673k, which is a substantial capital requirement for a concept lacking an Item 19 financial performance representation. ⚠ With no historical data on openings, closings, or unit economics, prospective franchisees are investing solely in intellectual property rather than a demonstrated track record of success.

Casalinea presents a ground-floor franchise opportunity characterized by a low 2.0% royalty fee and a clean background regarding litigation and bankruptcy. ⚠ The total lack of outlets and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure represent significant risks, offering no proof of concept or historical performance data for prospective investors. With zero growth last year, this concept relies entirely on the strength of its unproven business model rather than an established track record.

Wonderly Lights presents a high-risk profile characterized by a total lack of scale with zero operating outlets and no growth in the last year. ⚠ The disclosure of a past bankruptcy and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation create significant transparency concerns for potential investors. While the franchise fee is low at $6,000, the total investment of up to $89,430 combined with a 10% royalty fee is difficult to justify given the unproven business model.

Twisted Ink Franchising presents a high-risk profile with zero operational outlets, indicating an unproven business model despite a substantial total investment of $191,644 to $619,344. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure combined with a lack of unit growth or historical performance data makes it impossible to validate potential ROI. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should exercise extreme caution, as the high entry cost is not supported by a track record of successful operations or system scale.

Sparkle Squad, LLC presents a high-risk profile characterized by a complete lack of operational scale, with zero total outlets and no growth in the last year. ⚠ The franchise carries the burden of active litigation and fails to provide an Item 19 financial disclosure, leaving potential returns entirely unverified. ⚠ Additionally, the entry cost is steep for an unproven concept, requiring roughly $153k-$175k in upfront capital alongside a substantial 10% royalty fee.

Honest Art is an early-stage, low-cost art education franchise requiring an initial investment between $133,300 and $266,750. While the absence of litigation or bankruptcy is a positive sign, the lack of an Item 19 financial performance representation is a significant red flag that limits visibility into potential unit economics. With no disclosed outlet data, the system appears to be in a pre-growth or nascent phase, suggesting high execution risk for early adopters.

TEATOP presents a significant market entry risk as a pre-launch franchise system with zero established outlets, meaning prospective partners cannot validate the business model or consumer demand. ⚠ The franchise fee of $40,000 is notably aggressive for an unproven concept, and the absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents any data-driven assessment of potential ROI. ✓ The lack of litigation or bankruptcy history offers basic legal solvency, but the total investment of $140,500 to $297,500 represents a high-stakes gamble on a system with no operating history.

Einstein Bros. Bagels presents a high-barrier entry opportunity with a total investment ranging from $869,300 to $1,587,500, though the initial franchise fee is a moderate $25,000. ✓ The absence of litigation and bankruptcy history is a positive indicator of corporate stability, but the lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure prevents a clear assessment of unit economics. ⚠ Critical data regarding outlet counts and recent growth trajectories is missing, making it difficult to evaluate the brand's current market traction and scalability.

Nurse Next Door presents a high-barrier entry into the senior care market with a total investment ranging from $119,286 to $217,210 and a substantial $68,000 franchise fee. ⚠ Significant risks are present due to the disclosure of active litigation and the absence of an Item 19 financial performance representation, leaving potential investors without validated earnings data. ✓ The business model targets the growing demand for in-home care, though the lack of available data regarding total outlet count or recent growth makes it difficult to assess the system's current scale and trajectory.

Yogurt Mountain presents a low barrier to entry with a competitive $15,000 franchise fee, though the total investment varies significantly from $271k to $930k. ⚠ The absence of an Item 19 financial disclosure is a major red flag, preventing prospective franchisees from verifying potential earnings or unit viability. ⚠ The lack of data regarding outlet counts or recent growth activity further obscures the brand's current scale and market trajectory.

Uncle Sharkii presents a low barrier to entry with a competitive $10,000 franchise fee and a total investment range starting at $90,000. ⚠ The lack of an Item 19 financial disclosure and missing outlet count data are significant red flags that hinder a complete assessment of system viability and unit economics. ⚠ Prospective franchisees should proceed with caution, as the absence of transparency regarding scale and recent growth makes it difficult to gauge the brand's current market traction.